Quote:Liar liar. Macro evolutionary theory hasn't been fully empirically observed, moreover a good number of the major predictions in the origin of species have been disproved or lack corroboration. That's why they had to develop the theory of punctuated equilibrium to explain the relative stasis in both the observed and fossil records.

Macroevolution is a term that students from public schools only have no clue about. They only know evolution (inclusive of both marco and micro) and assume it is all the same because that's how their teachers teach it. This is of course, because microevolution i.e. adaption is scientific and proven, so they want to tie macroevoltion (a bird becoming a lizard etc) which has no proof to something that no one can reject. It is of course, disingenuous and intellectually dishonest, but what did you expect from a government curriculum?

 

Edit: spell, original from phone

---