Quote:Apparently you and your fancy private school education missed all the evidence.  There's plenty of evidence for macroevolution. From the transitional fossil record to genetics to much more. 

 

 

 

50 years?  That's a very short period of time, even with that many generations.  And even in that time, we've seen them undergo mutations and evolution.  50 years isn't a long period of time, even with a lot of generations.  I thought this would be understood by now.

Its the generations not the years that matter. The whole idea of evolution hinges on 'millions and billions of generations', a fish becomes a lizard etc. Well we have organisms that have had that many generations in the last 50 years when we are paying attention, and none of them became a different species. Its simple. The transitional fossil record is weak and full of holes, see the best example of 'horses' up to the last decade or two which was proven false and then quietly removed from texts.

 

Marco evolution is made on a whole lot of assumptions. But it is highly preferred to the alternative by academia. See Ben Stein's excellent (and non christian/religious btw) documentary on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5EPymcWp-g

---