Quote:well sure. But for whatever reason people have gravitated toward hating the leo/otto designations as if


a) were the only one who uses specific designations(were not)


b ) these designations are vastly different from the regular position(theyre different, but not by alot)


c) these designations are making it harder to find good players to play them (they dont, were just bad at drafting)

 

Someone get this man an apostrophe!  

 

(I'm kidding)

 

I actually appreciate usage of terms indicating alignments and gap assignments for d-linemen.  

 

Two DTs side-by-side in the middle of a 4/3 front can be employed a number of different ways and I don't mind being more specific about that stuff. 

 

Leo and Otto never bugged me either.  It's not that different. Folks are just annoyed by the hype it generated but never delivered on under Bradley -  and they take it out on the jargon.

---