Quote:There's no way this team could go into the season with Bortles and a #4 overall QB on the roster.

 

If they waste the #4 pick on a QB, they better trade Bortles, because both of them cannot be on this roster.

 

It'd do nothing but cause problems. We'd be stuck playing QB roulette all season long.

 

Any time Bortles would make a mistake, everybody would want the #4 overall pick to play. Soon as the #4 overall pick started making mistakes (which wouldn't take long), everybody will want Bortles back in. Rinse, wash and repeat all season.

 

QB at #4 would be the worst possible pick.

 

How do you figure taking a QB at #4 would be the worst possible pick? If Coughlin and Marrone believe that Bortles is done then there's really no point in riding out another less than sub par year under his arm. If they feel one of these QB's IS an upgrade than they'll trade him away to some team for a low end pick like we did with Gabbert.

 

All of these free agency signings so far don't add up to a team that has rebuild or average expectations in mind. This is still a weak division. And if we had a QB that was capable of not spotting opponents 7+ points every other week thanks to turnovers this team was probably already looking at 8 wins in 2016. 

 

Don't be surprised if it happens on draft night. It's pretty frustrating that Bortles continues to make rookie mistakes with the football while guys like Wentz (as a rookie with less college starts), Prescott, Carr, Mariota & Winston clearly show more competence in the decision making and big play ability department than he does.

 

A top 10 defense and stout running game doesn't mean [BAD WORD REMOVED] if your QB can barely complete 58% of his passes. He's just not efficient at all. 

---