Quote:How do you figure taking a QB at #4 would be the worst possible pick? If Coughlin and Marrone believe that Bortles is done then there's really no point in riding out another less than sub par year under his arm. If they feel one of these QB's IS an upgrade than they'll trade him away to some team for a low end pick like we did with Gabbert.

 

All of these free agency signings so far don't add up to a team that has rebuild or average expectations in mind. This is still a weak division. And if we had a QB that was capable of not spotting opponents 7+ points every other week thanks to turnovers this team was probably already looking at 8 wins in 2016. 

 

Don't be surprised if it happens on draft night. It's pretty frustrating that Bortles continues to make rookie mistakes with the football while guys like Wentz (as a rookie with less college starts), Prescott, Carr, Mariota & Winston clearly show more competence in the decision making and big play ability department than he does.

 

A top 10 defense and stout running game doesn't mean [BAD WORD REMOVED] if your QB can barely complete 58% of his passes. He's just not efficient at all. 

Prescott and Mariota have been in much different situations than Bortles has. They're managing games at this point.

 

Winston throws plenty of INTs himself. He's ask to do everything for that Offense, just like Bortles is.

 

Every team passed on Carr.

 

I liked Wentz coming out last year and would have taken him in the top 5. Obviously with the way things went in 2015, QB didn't look like it could have been a need.

 

I don't see any QBs this year really being worth a top 10 pick, let alone #4. Obviously QBs will get pushed up because of the need, but Bortles is better than any of the QB options in this draft.

 

Taking a RB at #4 would be better than a QB this year, and I don't even want a RB at #4.

 

I just don't see any of the QBs in this draft, being a better option this year.

---