The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
|
NFL.com - Marrone: Jaguars expect 'big jump' from Blake Bortles
|
(04-26-2018, 10:33 AM)The Eleventh Doctor Wrote:(04-25-2018, 07:09 AM)dennisp3 Wrote: Blake's quarterback rating among qb last year was 12th. Not bad and I think anyone would have been fine it they were told last year he would be 12th among QB's. So that is why he was rewarded with a new contract. QBR is useless but some other rando-QBrating system is good? Total QBR according to ESPN : Bortles was 12th http://www.espn.com/nfl/qbr QBR according to Pro Football Reference: Bortles was 15th Rating (which I guess is different than QBR) on PFR has Borts 20th Also your post reads like "You're wrong, unless you're not wrong, then I just dismiss the tools you used to reach your statement/theory/opinion" Everyone uses QBR, it is much harder to find the "passer rating" so I guess everyone is useless. I'm not a big QBR or even a pro football focus stats dude... but QBR seems simpler. 0-100 scale. The four separate calculations can be expressed in the following equations: ![[Image: d0cf9b3484a1bd6e8b21d985ca392fe003a65cfa]](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/d0cf9b3484a1bd6e8b21d985ca392fe003a65cfa){kind=small} ![[Image: 3864e4934d831230be43ceb64ad940776f314024]](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/3864e4934d831230be43ceb64ad940776f314024){kind=small} ![[Image: 8783a051cb0c490058e607291976288210839be2]](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/8783a051cb0c490058e607291976288210839be2){kind=small} ![[Image: 53b626cff6ce1beba0c6bf3c02aca666a9f3a697]](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/53b626cff6ce1beba0c6bf3c02aca666a9f3a697){kind=small} where ATT = Number of passing attempts COMP = Number of completions YDS = Passing yards TD = Touchdown passes INT = Interceptions If the result of any calculation is greater than 2.375, it is set to 2.375. If the result is a negative number, it is set to zero. Then, the above calculations are used to complete the passer rating: ![[Image: 3b3a6857c3faa89cf62df17a858882ec0360f5ec]](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/3b3a6857c3faa89cf62df17a858882ec0360f5ec){kind=small} This is how they find passer rating... and QBR is useless?? |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.