(01-09-2019, 10:55 AM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(01-09-2019, 10:50 AM)JackCity Wrote:

---

The Parcell rules are more guidelines than anything else and are woefully outdated to boot. They essentially serve as a risk assessment.  
There is no correlation to success with them.

I agree with this take on the Parcells guidelines, but I'm not so sure Coughlin does.

I know he said he uses them but I tend to still take that as risk assessment wise. Like ideally everyone would like a college QB who has multiple years of experience , who won a lot and was productive. They still have to be good enough.  

The interesting part of this draft is how Gettleman + Tom view Drew Lock. I mean, would it be that shocking if either of them wanted the rocket armed SEC multiple year starter QB over Haskins? With how the NFL views QB I would say no.

---