(02-08-2019, 07:51 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(02-08-2019, 05:04 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Maybe he wasn’t deemed a 3-4 year project universally, but virtually every scouting report on the guy used the words “raw and unpolished.”
Safe to say most of us didn’t expect much from his rookie season.

He was raw and I didnt expect much from him his rookie season.  JackCity is the first person I have seen say he was a 3 or 4 year project though.  Who else labeled him that?

---

(02-08-2019, 05:08 PM)JackCity Wrote: He was a project player with insane physical tools. When you draft raw pass rushers in the first thats usually the development curve you expect, nobody expected anything from rookie Bryan, nobody should be expected him to be good this year (year 2) but year 3 and 4 you expect him to be playing at a good level and getting to the Qb.  

I don't think that sounds outside the realms of what people thought Bryans development should be when we drafted him. Also yeah I didn't see an above average NFL player from Bryan this year (regardless of what PFF says), nor did I expect him to be. He was awful at end , was better at 3 tech of course but not above average in the slightest.

He has never been a DE, I dont know why Wash even played him there early on.  When they moved him at 3 tech he showed flashes of why they drafted him so early and started improving pretty much every game regardless of the his sack number was.  I think Bryan will be good this year in his 2nd season, we shall see.