(03-14-2019, 12:21 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(03-14-2019, 10:38 AM)B2hibry Wrote: Thorough as in to document a long line of corruption...sure that is a daunting task but doable. It's even more dificult when you don't follow Federal law and utilize your own servers. I have a real issue with not attempting a REAL investigation outside the control of the corrupt DOJ. Why no Special Council? I mean Mueller is on year two with arguably lesser and mostly fantasized information. In any case, it doesn't take a long list to show absolute law breaking and reason to charge. It only takes just one and it was a doozy! I can't support the reasoning of not doing a thorough job just because it's too difficult.

You're not following.
I don't think it was particularly daunting for them to get at least the metadata of the people that Hillary Clinton's email server was most likely communicating with.
Nor do I think it was difficult for them to get the content of the deleted messages from the recipients who looked like they might be suspicious.
And I suspect the FBI did both things quickly and thoroughly.
And then they turned around and told us that there was nothing corrupt or compromising in what they found. 
But then this leaves them trying to prove a negative to a skeptical public.
Maybe they're lying, maybe they're not, but there is no way to satisfy the skeptics without revealing further confidential information.
Hillary should have used government servers.
Even if she was on a private server she should have kept everything.
But she publicly admitted to deleting stuff.  Regardless of why she did it, she put the FBI in a literally impossible position. Shame on her.