The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
If Haskins is available....we should take him.
|
(03-21-2019, 12:58 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:(03-21-2019, 12:13 PM)JNev Wrote: Yea honestly I can't see how people can say the Foles move is a negative move (outside of the opportunity cost of Haskins perhaps). It may not be a Home Run, but it's definitely not hurting the team or making them worseFor this season, yes. Foles is better than Blake and that's obvious which means it's an upgrade at QB. Foles just turned 30. You act like hes close to 40. Lol. Hes younger than Matt Ryan and Russell Wilson. Luck, Newton, and Foles are only months apart |
Users browsing this thread: |
3 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.