Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
If Haskins is available....we should take him.

#47
(This post was last modified: 03-22-2019, 10:15 AM by Cleatwood.)

(03-22-2019, 12:08 AM)rpr52121 Wrote:
(03-21-2019, 01:26 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: That has nothing to do with it. 

It has everything to do with Haskins and the ability to keep the defense together while adding offensive pieces around a QB on a rookie contract. It also has to do with the fact that some of us see Haskins as an elite prospect who can really carry a team.

I'm gonna get behind Foles but I'm also going to keep an eye on Haskins to see how he does. This could be Mahomes all over again.

Everyone needs to calm down on this thing. Haskins had 1 great college season. Sure the videos in the draft evaluations have been good as well, but he could easily become the next Byron Leftwich versus the next great NFL passer. There is no sure thing there. Even those really high on him have him behind Baker and Darnold from last year, and Darnold's rookie season was no where near good enough to lead a playoff team.

Also, everyone needs to put a pause on all this Mahomes love. He had one of the most historically great seasons of all time. Guess what. So did Foles in his first season, and he never repeated that level of production. We don't know what he will become or achieve, so lets pause with the whole woe is me the Jaguars epically botched it again.
Hahahaha So did Foles?!

Did Foles throw for 50 TD passes and 5,000 yards? Good grief. You can't compare those two seasons. It's also not hard to watch Mahomes and see he's different than just about every QB in the league.

You don't think the Jags epically botched selecting Fournette over Mahomes? Even if Mahomes never matches those totals again, it's still an epic fail by this franchise to select Fournette over Mahomes. It's an epic fail to select Fournette over McCaffery.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: If Haskins is available....we should take him. - by Cleatwood - 03-22-2019, 10:14 AM
PortDawgJags808 - by PortDawgJags808 - 04-20-2019, 02:54 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!