(01-31-2020, 06:10 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(01-31-2020, 05:42 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: Regarding the part in bold, it was most likely because they (Ukraine) were investigating his son regarding corruption.  You know, the son that had no experience in the industry that he was "hired" for.  It was all about the money.

You can say "what if" all you want (as far as Hillary being out of the picture).  There really is no relevance to your rambling about it.  The fact of the matter remains.  Joe Biden did in fact commit a "prid-quo-pro" while serving as the Vice President.  It had nothing to do with political gain and everything to do about money.

The contrast here is that President Trump did NOT commit a "qrid-quo-pro" or bribery (which were the initial allegations).  He made a legitimate request to a new Prime Minister regarding corruption.

for the sake of argument let's agree that Biden committed a quid pro quo for money. 
I contend that Trump committed a quid pro quo to get a negative story about Biden in the news and influence this year's election.
As voters, which type of quid pro quo should we be more concerned about? Guys looking to skim a little bit of foreign money on the side, or guys looking to get those foreign governments to tip the scales in the election?