(02-05-2020, 04:34 PM)Mikey Wrote: Okay, so the first time we lost a home game to London, IIRC season tickets stayed at the same (?) price, basically keeping the cost constant, but lowering the contents received from the package. This was at a time that our tickets were at or near the bottom of the league as far as cost per game, something that we all knew was not going to continue, especially with a new owner and a 9-figure investment waiting to return profit.

The selling point of losing the game was that the prices inflated more to the norm of what should be expected for games, and fans, while not happy, did not show up to the stadium with torches and pitchforks.

Years later, here we are, still struggling to sell the stadium full, and another home game is lost to London. Ticket pricing is reduced for season tickets, based on the reduction again to the home schedule. Fans seem a lot angrier now, and some go so far as to say the end of the franchise is near.

All that said to pose this hypothetical:  If your season ticket package was more expensive, but included comparably-located seats (transferrable, so they could be brokered on an official site like stubhub or stubbehubbe, if that is the British equivalent) to the two London games, how would you perceive that package?

You would still have to pay up for travel and accomodations overseas, but if you wished, you would be able to still see 10 games in person, or you could put your seats into a possibly saturated market (realistically, how many people can travel overseas for 7-10 days?) for resale and recoup some of the season ticket expense.

Would you prefer this model to the 6+1 pricing that was proposed yesterday?
Would it change your current mindset as to whether or not you plan to buy or renew next season?
If it was offered as a premium STH package alongside the everyday 6+1 package, would you choose one over the other?