The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
TheO-LineMatters 7 round mock draft 3.0 (Hopefully the last one)
|
(04-27-2021, 09:49 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:Lololol, Hayward has the benefit of Tuitt being on the other side is comical. Hayward has been one of the best defensive players in the league for a while now and is a better player than Tuitt lol. The only reason Tuitt's inflated sack number this year is because TJ Watt is next to him, the guy who could of easily been defensive player of the year and arguably the best pass rusher in the league . And you said star lineman not pass rusher. You listed Suh as a great pass rusher. Suh is still a good player but far from the great pass rusher he used to be.(04-27-2021, 06:58 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: It's funny you listed Tuitt but not Heyward, a guy who has been one of the best dlinman since entering the league. Not to mention you left off a number of studs who is better than anything we have on the dline. You are the only person on this board that thinks we are loaded on the dline. I want a game changer up front if we are able to land one and as does Meyer unless you just think he is lying everytime he puts a emphasis on having a great dline. You said this draft is what you think the Jags will do and then you said you passed Barmore multiple times because you think our dline is loaded. I dont think Baalke and Meyer thinks our dline is loaded, if they felt that we wouldn't of tried to land Alualu. Even if we were able to get Alu I still think they would of tried to upgrade the dline in the draft (04-27-2021, 10:12 AM)Bullseye Wrote:(04-27-2021, 10:06 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: No matter what you believe, needs have to count for something or you will continue to have the same issues year after year. Just look at the Colts. They ignored the O-Line year after year and it forced their franchise QB to retire early. A new GM comes in, sees the need and builds their biggest weakness into one of the best units in the NFL. Unfortunately for him, the previous GM ignored the need for so long, that Luck had a myriad of injuries due to his lack of protection by the previous administration and the damage was already done. You have to address needs when you are a 1-15 team. You just have to. When you get to a point of being a playoff or Superbowl team, then you can truly draft BAP regardless of need. Until then, you draft BAP at a position of need or else you will never get better.Admittedly, this is not a strong DL class by any measure. Shelvin is your prototypical NT, a totally different player than Barmore. McNeil as well, he has some pass rush but he is a NT as well, reminds me of Wilfork. Barmore is a different player than both |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.