(06-13-2022, 10:13 AM)mikesez Wrote:

(06-13-2022, 08:57 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: "If you perceive that you are somewhere up high compared to me, it is not because you are standing on any facts, that's for sure.  You are only standing on your own pride, and you only read my posts starting from the assumption that I'm wrong and you're right, so you're looking for something to nitpick..."

"Teach yourself and come back when your level of knowledge is comparable to mine."

Naw man, that's some faulty NYC water treatment plant stink.

But was I wrong?

I'm wrong sometimes.  When I'm wrong, you guys point out the facts.  But when I'm right, and you don't have any facts or logic to cite, you call me names and say I'm bring odious or a know-it-all.  

Sneakers said that letting a violent mob tell Congress and the states what to do wouldn't be a step towards dictatorship.  Was he right?

As flsprtgod already pointed out, that's not at all close to what I said.  Was it intentional misrepresentation?   If you have comprehension difficulties, please let me know and I'll try to simplify my posts for you.

"Telling" congress what to do and forcing Congress to do something are vastly different.  For example, stop calling this specific event an insurrection and being an arrogant donkey's butt about so much else.  Unfortunately, I can't force you to do either of these things, so I don't expect much to change.

How could any mentally competent person reasonably believe that simply occupying a building for a few hours would force Congress to concede to a crowd's demands?  Is our government that fragile?

---