I think it will be interesting to see how we approach the next game.


Bortles stats were obviously inflated in this game because the Colts had already won. But will he go out with the same mentality against the Chargers ? Will we look to use the run game a bit more, now that we've established an aerial attack ? And will a more conservative approach be needed, to cut out the interceptions ?

---

I think it will be interesting to see how we approach the next game.

Bortles stats were obviously inflated in this game because the Colts had already won. But will he go out with the same mentality against the Chargers ? Will we look to use the run game a bit more, now that we've established an aerial attack ? And will a more conservative approach be needed, to cut out the interceptions ?

I wouldn't worry about the INTs. Those will happen. We still moved the ball and scored points with Bortles in. I think we.ll have a much more competent running game next week.

---

IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS

The first interception did not bother me. It was single coverage and a well-thrown ball. The second one was a head-scratcher though.


How we approach the next game depends on two things: what happens in meeting rooms and what happens in practices.

---

I'd be interested to know how much Bortles learned in the first half as he wasn't ready until half time...

---

Time for a link to prove Gus said it: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000...-in-week-4

 

He confirmed what I could see on the field.  Blake's ability to make the whole offense better was undisputable today.

---

That thread, and then the one asking about it were both deleted. I thought it was too good to be true myself.

I think everyone did. Everyone would have assumed it was fake if they hadn't lent it credence by trying to cover it up. Guys, no offence, but you suck at cover ups.

---