Thanks for the gif, NYC... I really wish they would have given Denard more touches. It's a real head scratcher why the benched him.


As that first play shows, he looked dangerous, more so than Toby or Todman. Why not give him more opportunities?

---

Was he not the #2 RB on the depth chart?

---

The guy is just not very good or dependable.  The coaches do not trust him.  Move on.

 

He has straight line speed, that's about it.  

 

 

Sounds an awful lot like Todman to me, not Robinson. Robinson has the best vision among all of our backs. 

---

Does anyone remember how many plays Todman was in? What were his running statistics?

 

I would have kept Robinson in too. Six yards may not look like much, but wehn you get close to the first down, that is doing pretty good.

 

I also was surprised Gerhart did not miss more plays. You would think a guy who is "questionable to return" misses the rest of the first half.

---

Was he not the #2 RB on the depth chart?

 

And he was the second running back in the game. Bradley never changed the order on the depth chart.

 

The head scratcher is why Robinson did not play untl Gerhart could return.

---