Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Clowney#1 - Mack #2 -- what do the Jags do? MOCK

#21

Quote:I'd take the BAP, in this case it'd be Sammy Watkins.
 

Agree.

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#22
(This post was last modified: 03-31-2014, 03:40 PM by ATLjag.)

I would take Bridgewater, if no trade down opportunity exists.  I could pick up a WR later with starting capability.


Reply

#23

I don't want Mack at 3 so it wouldn't upset me if he was one of the first two.  Clowney is a guy I would like at 3 and hope he's available.  I'm not an advocate at taking a WR at 3, especially given where our current roster sits.  WR in the top 5 isn't a good idea.  They don't change the game enough or potentially effect the game enough.  Outside of the likes of Calvin Johnson I'm not sure I'd consider it.  Unless the WR is far and away your best prospect on the board I'd avoid it.

 

If Clowney isn't there at 3 I hope a trade down presents itself for one of the tackles or QBs.


Reply

#24

To those saying Bridgewater, doesn't it send up red flags to you when a team like Houston would rather take Clowney over a QB considering they have one of the best passrushers in the league and one of the worst QB situations?


Reply

#25

Teddy, Sammy, or Johnny
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#26

Quote:To those saying Bridgewater, doesn't it send up red flags to you when a team like Houston would rather take Clowney over a QB considering they have one of the best passrushers in the league and one of the worst QB situations?


Should the Chargers have been concerned the Raiders took Robert Gallery or Phillip Rivers?
;

;
Reply

#27

Quote:I know what you do... you create a new thread asking the same question over and over and over and over again...
Yet, you responded. Way to take a stand :thumbsup:

 

As for the original question- Still Watkins for me

Reply

#28
(This post was last modified: 03-31-2014, 04:16 PM by Markulous.)

Quote:Should the Chargers have been concerned the Raiders took Robert Gallery or Phillip Rivers?
But Eli Manning went first overall...


EDIT: Also Oakland has the worst drafts ever.  A kicker in the first round?  DHB?


Reply

#29

Quote:http://walterfootball.com/draft2013.php

 

Really?
In his defense, they did have Geno mocked to the Jags most of the offseason last year. The site really started slamming the Jags after the Caldwell "No Tebow" statement. There is a Tebow love fest on there, just as big as the one that went on here a couple years ago.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#30

Quote:But Eli Manning went first overall...

EDIT: Also Oakland has the worst drafts ever. A kicker in the first round? DHB?


Plenty of other examples. I wouldn't use Houston passing on him as concern.
;

;
Reply

#31
(This post was last modified: 03-31-2014, 06:00 PM by GreeceMonkE.)

I have a feeling it will go:

 

Texans - Clowney

Rams - Watkins

Jaguars - Manziel/Bridgewater - whomever the FO feels is the better QB talent.


Reply

#32

Quote:Plenty of other examples. I wouldn't use Houston passing on him as concern.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but where are some examples of a QB needy team passing on a QB for a pass rusher when they have one of the best in the league and then a team drafts one at 2 or 3?  I can't recall any instances of this.

Reply

#33

Manziel or Watkins


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#34

Quote:Walterfootball, lol

 

He had Geno Smith as #1 all year last year. Take his opinion as you may...
No.. he didn't.

Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 
Reply

#35

Manziel in any scenario that he is available.


Reply

#36

Quote:To those saying Bridgewater, doesn't it send up red flags to you when a team like Houston would rather take Clowney over a QB considering they have one of the best passrushers in the league and one of the worst QB situations?
I'm pretty sure that the Chicago Bulls are happy they ignored the red flags raised by Portland taking Sam Bowie instead of Michael Jordan.

 

Also worth noting that your question is valid for the Manziel and Bortles crowds (is there a Bortles crowd?) as well.

Reply

#37

Quote:I'm not saying you're wrong, but where are some examples of a QB needy team passing on a QB for a pass rusher when they have one of the best in the league and then a team drafts one at 2 or 3?  I can't recall any instances of this.
 

St Louis took Chris Long over Matt Ryan

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#38

Quote:I'm pretty sure that the Chicago Bulls are happy they ignored the red flags raised by Portland taking Sam Bowie instead of Michael Jordan.

 

Also worth noting that your question is valid for the Manziel and Bortles crowds (is there a Bortles crowd?) as well.
 

Great call. There is not a Bortles crowd, is there?

Reply

#39

Quote:St Louis took Chris Long over Matt Ryan
That is actually a good example.  Both of the Longs got taken before Ryan did.  The only difference (and I'm not saying that it makes your post moot) is that I don't think STL had anyone even remotely close to the caliber of player Watt is.

Reply

#40

This is the easiest question anybody has asked.  If you have the opportunity, you take Teddy.


Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!