http://walterfootball.com/draft2014charlie.php

 

The above mock has Clowney going #1 and Mack going #2.  IF that is the case and assuming they do not get a good "trade down" deal:

 

1) Who would you like the Jags to select?

 

2) Who do you think the Jags will select?

 

 

The mock has us taking Bortles w/ the #3 pick.

---

I'd take the BAP, in this case it'd be Sammy Watkins.

---

Walterfootball, lol

 

He had Geno Smith as #1 all year last year. Take his opinion as you may...

---

Jags- Watkins


Me- Manziel, Watkins, or Evans

---

---

1) Who would you like the Jags to select?

 

2) Who do you think the Jags will select?

With Clowney gone, there's no one else at #3 who would bring more immediate upswing to the offense, more excitement to the fanbase, more money to the franchise, or more potential for the Jaguars to turn the ship-around next season with one single pick than yours truly

 

---

I want 3 players. Clowney, Bridgewater, Manziel. Jaguars have the number 3 pick. Just give me one of those 3 at 3, and I'm happy.

 

My top 6 favorite posters on these boards

Deacon
Pirkster
Shack Del Rio
Haterade
Hurricane
Badger

http://walterfootball.com/draft2014charlie.php

 

The above mock has Clowney going #1 and Mack going #2.  IF that is the case and assuming they do not get a good "trade down" deal:

 

1) Who would you like the Jags to select?

 

2) Who do you think the Jags will select?

 

 

The mock has us taking Bortles w/ the #3 pick.

I know what you do... you create a new thread asking the same question over and over and over and over again...

---

1. Watkins


2. Bortles, Watkins or Manziel

---

If our scouting staff is on the same page as Houston, then I'd venture to guess we would not draft a QB there.  My guess would be Watkins.  I don't think we grab a RT.

---

I know what you do... you create a new thread asking the same question over and over and over and over again...

 

I've never asked this question.  Please feel free to research a scenario that I asked a question resulting from Clowney and Mack being selected #1 & #2.  In fact, this is the 1st mock that I've seen that has Mack going #2.

---

With Clowney gone, there's no one else at #3 who would bring more immediate upswing to the offense, more excitement to the fanbase, more money to the franchise, or more potential for the Jaguars to turn the ship-around next season with one single pick than yours truly

Wow they cant be serious

---

I've never asked this question.  Please feel free to research a scenario that I asked a question resulting from Clowney and Mack being selected #1 & #2.  In fact, this is the 1st mock that I've seen that has Mack going #2.

You're just recreating a thread that has basically asked that same question about 20 different times with different players. People's responses are going to be the same because they still like the same players they liked before.

 

It's just boring.... (Cue where you say... then don't post in the thread if you don't like it)

---

Walterfootball, lol

 

He had Geno Smith as #1 all year last year. Take his opinion as you may...

http://walterfootball.com/draft2013.php

 

Really?

---

"Don't argue with an idiot, people watching may not be able to tell the difference."

Take Teddy

---

<B><FONT color=cyan>Jags this is your year</FONT></B>

Manziel.  Should have made this a poll.

---

I'd take Bridgewater. I think the Jags would take Bridgewater as well.

---

Crazy how different these answers are than 6 months ago when all the craze was Tanking for Teddy!

---

http://walterfootball.com/draft2013.php

 

Really?

 

That was his latest. He had GS almost all year because he assumes people still draft off need even though in hindsight, Smith isn't even worthy of a 6th round pick. Not to mention, he is also still butt hurt that Caldwell decided to give Gabbert a year to see if he was truly the answer or not which stems Walter's hate for the Jaguars.

---

You're just recreating a thread that has basically asked that same question about 20 different times with different players. People's responses are going to be the same because they still like the same players they liked before.

 

It's just boring.... (Cue where you say... then don't post in the thread if you don't like it)

 

Perhaps the above is true but I don't spend a significant time on this area of the board AND this is the 1st I've seen where Clowney and Mack could potentially be gone.  Everything I've seen up until now has Mack available at #3.

---

Watkins.

 

Superstar.

---