Called that one. Don't stay at 20.

https://twitter.com/JimNagy_SB/status/12...7660316672

But the problem is, if you can get the same level of player at 40-60 as you can get in the 20s, who in the 40-60 range is going to want to trade up?

---

Called that one. Don't stay at 20.

https://twitter.com/JimNagy_SB/status/12...7660316672

But the problem is, if you can get the same level of player at 40-60 as you can get in the 20s, who in the 40-60 range is going to want to trade up?

I'd actually be advocating to trade up from 20, but either way someone will move for something.

---

Yes trading up makes a ton of sense at #20, and we have more than enough capital to do so.  

Moving up to 13/14/15/16 would only cost around a 2020 3rd and 2021 3rd I would say, depending on the team

I totally agree with this. Ideally, they would get any one of Brown, Simmons or Okudah at 9 and then either Henderson or Kinlaw with the trade up to 13-16. 

Brown/Henderson or Akudah'Kinlaw would be an amazing 1st round.

---

I agree, we should trade up from 20. Or if you can trade down from 9 and pick up another pick in the 40-60 range that helps alot 2

---

Probably not a bad spot if we want to add a pass rusher like Chaisson, Epenesa or Gross Matos.

But yeah, a trade up would be more sexy.

---

I've heard the Jags are looking to trade back. Could we target a move to 9? Maybe throw Yan in to sweeten the deal.

---