Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Trump Indicted, Charges are pending...


(08-31-2023, 10:04 AM)Sneakers Wrote:
(08-31-2023, 08:59 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: So you haven't read the Eastman emails

Emails from Eastman to others may implicate him, but that may not extend to Trump.  Again, testimony regarding yet unknown conversations will likely determine the outcome. 

In any event, a trial, if/when we get to that point, will be an absolute media circus.

This is a weakness of the federal case.  The state of Georgia's case is stronger.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(08-31-2023, 10:10 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(08-31-2023, 10:04 AM)Sneakers Wrote: Emails from Eastman to others may implicate him, but that may not extend to Trump.  Again, testimony regarding yet unknown conversations will likely determine the outcome. 

In any event, a trial, if/when we get to that point, will be an absolute media circus.

This is a weakness of the federal case.  The state of Georgia's case is stronger.

No

it's not

They've got plenty that implicates his involvement and direction.
This is wishful thinking by MAGA supporters. Nothing more. 
Maybe a few of the charges against him will be tough to tie him to directly, but most of them he already put his own foot in his mouth about. 

And there's a reason Trump had a [BLEEP] fit yesterday about Jack Smith subpoenaing (and receiving) all of Trump's twitter history.
White House aides who have already rolled over for the prosecution allege that Trump used twitter DMs much more freely than texting in communicating with staff. Apparently he thought it wouldn't be as accessible to outside agencies. LOL
Reply


(08-31-2023, 11:50 AM)NYC4jags Wrote:
(08-31-2023, 10:10 AM)mikesez Wrote: This is a weakness of the federal case.  The state of Georgia's case is stronger.

No

it's not

They've got plenty that implicates his involvement and direction.
This is wishful thinking by MAGA supporters. Nothing more. 
Maybe a few of the charges against him will be tough to tie him to directly, but most of them he already put his own foot in his mouth about. 

And there's a reason Trump had a [BLEEP] fit yesterday about Jack Smith subpoenaing (and receiving) all of Trump's twitter history.
White House aides who have already rolled over for the prosecution allege that Trump used twitter DMs much more freely than texting in communicating with staff. Apparently he thought it wouldn't be as accessible to outside agencies. LOL

Right.  The federal indictment,  on certain counts, says more about lower level DoJ officials than it says about Trump.  Unless they're going to be able to show that Trump directed Eastman's specific behavior, those counts should be against Eastman, not Trump.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


(08-31-2023, 11:58 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(08-31-2023, 11:50 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: No

it's not

They've got plenty that implicates his involvement and direction.
This is wishful thinking by MAGA supporters. Nothing more. 
Maybe a few of the charges against him will be tough to tie him to directly, but most of them he already put his own foot in his mouth about. 

And there's a reason Trump had a [BLEEP] fit yesterday about Jack Smith subpoenaing (and receiving) all of Trump's twitter history.
White House aides who have already rolled over for the prosecution allege that Trump used twitter DMs much more freely than texting in communicating with staff. Apparently he thought it wouldn't be as accessible to outside agencies. LOL

Right.  The federal indictment,  on certain counts, says more about lower level DoJ officials than it says about Trump.  Unless they're going to be able to show that Trump directed Eastman's specific behavior, those counts should be against Eastman, not Trump.

LOL

Y'all are hilarious.

There is a boatload of testimony already on record from the Jan 6 investigation that clearly implicates Trump in the electors scheme. Nobody paid any attention to that?? Wow. It was kind of a big deal, y'all. 

Pence, Ivanka, and other Trump aides all testified under oath about the phone call Trump made to Pence attempting to intimidate him into going along with the cockamamy scheme. 

And that was not the only evidence linking him. 

Wow, ppl got their heads in the sand on this [BLEEP]
Reply


(08-31-2023, 12:03 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:
(08-31-2023, 11:58 AM)mikesez Wrote: Right.  The federal indictment,  on certain counts, says more about lower level DoJ officials than it says about Trump.  Unless they're going to be able to show that Trump directed Eastman's specific behavior, those counts should be against Eastman, not Trump.

LOL

Y'all are hilarious.

There is a boatload of testimony already on record from the Jan 6 investigation that clearly implicates Trump in the electors scheme. Nobody paid any attention to that?? Wow. It was kind of a big deal, y'all. 

Pence, Ivanka, and other Trump aides all testified under oath about the phone call Trump made to Pence attempting to intimidate him into going along with the cockamamy scheme. 

And that was not the only evidence linking him. 

Wow, ppl got their heads in the sand on this [BLEEP]

I'm on your side, homie.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(08-31-2023, 01:01 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(08-31-2023, 12:03 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: LOL

Y'all are hilarious.

There is a boatload of testimony already on record from the Jan 6 investigation that clearly implicates Trump in the electors scheme. Nobody paid any attention to that?? Wow. It was kind of a big deal, y'all. 

Pence, Ivanka, and other Trump aides all testified under oath about the phone call Trump made to Pence attempting to intimidate him into going along with the cockamamy scheme. 

And that was not the only evidence linking him. 

Wow, ppl got their heads in the sand on this [BLEEP]

I'm on your side, homie.

Heard

I'm just surprised so many folks are unaware of what is already out there in terms of damning evidence
Reply


Let the sentencing begin.

NH3...

https://www.npr.org/2023/09/05/119720261...6-sentence
"AZANE"
Reply


Yeah... let's get that white supremacist leader, Enrique Tarrio.
Reply


(09-05-2023, 03:37 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: Yeah... let's get that white supremacist leader, Enrique Tarrio.

You spelled domestic terrorist wrong

I've been saying for months that multiple agencies intercepted communication form several of these wanna-be militia groups leading up to and on the day of Jan 6.  - Only for folks here to tell me they were all just "tourists." 

Well - a Trump appointed judge says they were terrorists. 

Quote:U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, agreed with prosecutors that the Proud Boys’ crimes could be punished as “terrorism” — increasing the recommended sentence under federal guidelines. But he ultimately sentenced the Proud Boys to prison terms shorter than what prosecutors were seeking.
The backbone of the government’s case was hundreds of messages exchanged by Proud Boys in the days leading up to Jan. 6 that prosecutors say showed how the extremists saw themselves as revolutionaries and celebrated the Capitol attack, which sent lawmakers running into hiding.

[url=https://www.wcvb.com/article/peter-stager-prison-sentence/44652905][/url]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(09-05-2023, 03:37 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: Yeah... let's get that white supremacist leader, Enrique Tarrio.

Swing and a miss.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


Gotta love that war on terror.
Reply


(08-31-2023, 12:03 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:
(08-31-2023, 11:58 AM)mikesez Wrote: Right.  The federal indictment,  on certain counts, says more about lower level DoJ officials than it says about Trump.  Unless they're going to be able to show that Trump directed Eastman's specific behavior, those counts should be against Eastman, not Trump.


Pence, Ivanka, and other Trump aides all testified under oath about the phone call Trump made to Pence attempting to intimidate him into going along with the cockamamy scheme. 

That is the prosecution's allegation.  A jury will decide if it is true.
When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.
Reply


(08-31-2023, 01:03 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:
(08-31-2023, 01:01 PM)mikesez Wrote: I'm on your side, homie.

Heard

I'm just surprised so many folks are unaware of what is already out there in terms of damning evidence

They don't want to know, so they gravitate to news sources that don't cover it.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(08-31-2023, 01:03 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:
(08-31-2023, 01:01 PM)mikesez Wrote: I'm on your side, homie.

Heard

I'm just surprised so many folks are unaware of what is already out there in terms of damning evidence
What was brilliant about the Jan. 6th committee investigation was most of the witnesses were Republicans.
Reply


(09-05-2023, 06:10 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:
(09-05-2023, 03:37 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: Yeah... let's get that white supremacist leader, Enrique Tarrio.

You spelled domestic terrorist wrong

I've been saying for months that multiple agencies intercepted communication form several of these wanna-be militia groups leading up to and on the day of Jan 6.  - Only for folks here to tell me they were all just "tourists." 

Well - a Trump appointed judge says they were terrorists. 

Quote:U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, agreed with prosecutors that the Proud Boys’ crimes could be punished as “terrorism” — increasing the recommended sentence under federal guidelines. But he ultimately sentenced the Proud Boys to prison terms shorter than what prosecutors were seeking.
The backbone of the government’s case was hundreds of messages exchanged by Proud Boys in the days leading up to Jan. 6 that prosecutors say showed how the extremists saw themselves as revolutionaries and celebrated the Capitol attack, which sent lawmakers running into hiding.

[url=https://www.wcvb.com/article/peter-stager-prison-sentence/44652905][/url]

Judge Kelly's opinion represents a very liberal expansion of the traditionally held definition of "terrorism".  If it applies to this situation, it should apply equally to BLM protesters who torch buildings and attack police.
When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.
Reply


(09-06-2023, 08:40 AM)Sneakers Wrote:
(09-05-2023, 06:10 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: You spelled domestic terrorist wrong

I've been saying for months that multiple agencies intercepted communication form several of these wanna-be militia groups leading up to and on the day of Jan 6.  - Only for folks here to tell me they were all just "tourists." 

Well - a Trump appointed judge says they were terrorists. 


[url=https://www.wcvb.com/article/peter-stager-prison-sentence/44652905][/url]

Judge Kelly's opinion represents a very liberal expansion of the traditionally held definition of "terrorism".  If it applies to this situation, it should apply equally to BLM protesters who torch buildings and attack police.

Riots aren't terrorism and neither are protests, this is just an attempt to broaden the criminal code (again) to over-Police some segments of society. If protestors turn into rioters there's plenty of laws on the books to deal with them if the DAs would apply them to lefties the way they are trying with these righties.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply


My administration will guarantee terrorism and RICO charges for all!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/atlanta-cop-c...04996.html
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(09-06-2023, 06:57 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:
(08-31-2023, 01:03 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Heard

I'm just surprised so many folks are unaware of what is already out there in terms of damning evidence

They don't want to know, so they gravitate to news sources that don't cover it.

Where can one find this mountain of incontrovertible evidence that you claim exists and is already in public circulation?
When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.
Reply


(09-06-2023, 08:54 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:
(09-06-2023, 08:40 AM)Sneakers Wrote: Judge Kelly's opinion represents a very liberal expansion of the traditionally held definition of "terrorism".  If it applies to this situation, it should apply equally to BLM protesters who torch buildings and attack police.

Riots aren't terrorism and neither are protests, this is just an attempt to broaden the criminal code (again) to over-Police some segments of society. If protestors turn into rioters there's plenty of laws on the books to deal with them if the DAs would apply them to lefties the way they are trying with these righties.

There's not a clear, easily explained line between a riot and a terrorist act.  That said, threatening to kill members of Congress and the Vice President crosses that line.  "Are you killing people or threatening to kill people" is as good of a rule of thumb as any.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


(09-06-2023, 08:54 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:
(09-06-2023, 08:40 AM)Sneakers Wrote: Judge Kelly's opinion represents a very liberal expansion of the traditionally held definition of "terrorism".  If it applies to this situation, it should apply equally to BLM protesters who torch buildings and attack police.

Riots aren't terrorism and neither are protests, this is just an attempt to broaden the criminal code (again) to over-Police some segments of society. If protestors turn into rioters there's plenty of laws on the books to deal with them if the DAs would apply them to lefties the way they are trying with these righties.

You forgot to emphasize the important part.

mikesez will be along shortly to say, "But that was an attack on the Constitution....."
When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!