What motive would Alfie have to lie about this?

He is anti-Gus so there's that... Anything that undermines Gus's leadership abilities is something he would peddle. Or he might simply have just gotten trolled. Or it might just be clickbait. Maybe he was bored? Maybe he just likes to stir the pot? Maybe he was stoned? I dunno man but it certainly is not a substantiated claim.

---

Jags won't be a winning team until they are moved to london. Thier first season in London Jags will go 9-7.  unforttanttly this year will be a long one. 2-14. at best.

 

I know what you're doing wolfman.  You think the Jags will do the opposite of what you predict.  We're on to you man.  But if it works, I'm all for it!

---

I'm condescending. That means I talk down to you.

He is anti-Gus so there's that... Anything that undermines Gus's leadership abilities is something he would peddle. Or he might simply have just gotten trolled. Or it might just be clickbait. Maybe he was bored? Maybe he just likes to stir the pot? Maybe he was stoned? I dunno man but it certainly is not a substantiated claim.

In His defense it has been pretty easy to question Gus leadership ability.  We all know he builds a great Sundae but we need a winner.   I am anti Gus as the next guy until I see some winning.

---

He is anti-Gus so there's that... Anything that undermines Gus's leadership abilities is something he would peddle.

Gus has leadership abilities?

---

"We believe in victory!"   - Gus Bradley
"I don't want to believe.  I want to know."   - Carl Sagan

your insults are pathetic

 

we're known as the team you start beating the crap out of after halftime, if you haven't already

 

because god knows gus isn't making any kind of adjustments.. this is the same man that couldn't even move a corner from one side of the field to the other when the cowboys figured out that all they had to do to get dez bryant open was move him to the opposite side

 

brilliance

 

 

I love how you dim wits make up your own points and then argue against them as if the person you quoted said this.

 

I guess  the only way you can find someone dumb enough to win an argument against is to argue against yourself.

---

He is anti-Gus so there's that... Anything that undermines Gus's leadership abilities is something he would peddle. Or he might simply have just gotten trolled. Or it might just be clickbait. Maybe he was bored? Maybe he just likes to stir the pot? Maybe he was stoned? I dunno man but it certainly is not a substantiated claim.

Shouldn't we all at the very least be skeptical of Gus at this point? The man has had some serious in game gaffes over his tenure here, and you can't blame that on talent. I am not a fan, but I am not completely 100% sold that he is a failure, and would love to see him get a 10 win+ season here and a home playoff game. 

---

Wolfie needs a pep rally, whos in?

 

Go Jaguars!

Go Jaguars!

Go Jaguars!

Go Jaguars!

Go Jaguars!

Go Jaguars!

Go Jaguars!

---

Gus has leadership abilities?

Look at the roster when he got here. Look at the attitude of the team from then to now. This team stunk on ice the first year, and we got more wins than should have been expected. Second year the record was about where the talent was. Last year we got hit hard by injuries, but were still in most games. Throughout it all, Gus never lost the team. The players love playing for him. So yeah, that's some leadership. 

While I am disappointed like many others that we didn't get as many wins as I would hope last year, I don't put it on Gus. To take one example, I think had Thomas not gotten injured and Marks been healthy, we would have made the playoffs. Injuries happen to all teams, but that shows how devoid last year we were of playmakers that could pick up when others went down. Again, not on Gus.

---

<p class="bbc_left">Education is the cheap defense of nations. - Edmund Burke

<p class="bbc_left"> 

<p class="bbc_left">Or is it from Burke? I tried finding the source, and looked through some of his writings, no luck. Anybody with google-fu got a citation of the source?

If i were Khan, I would understand that the first 2 years of Gus's term really don't count for wins and losses, it was through a complete overhaul of the roster. It wouldn't be fair to hold him to the exact same standard those years as other coaches, but of course the average fan doesn't care about that. I'd say he knows that Gus and Dave have had enough time and enough players to have what should be the foundation we wanted to build.... with that said i think 7-8 wins and Gus will be head coach the following year... less than that and he's gone probably. Honestly i don't think he's should be fired based on just wins and losses this year but on the overall development of the team..

 

Also , Gus was brought in to help build this team... it would be a little unfair to not give him time to work with the more "completed" roster.

---

I love how you dim wits make up your own points and then argue against them as if the person you quoted said this.

 

I guess  the only way you can find someone dumb enough to win an argument against is to argue against yourself.

 

Oh I am perfectly willing to argue against my "own points" with you

 

First how about you make a public poll in it's own thread asking about bradleys halftime adjustments so we can all get a huge roar of a laugh at the results

 

Then we shalt continue on, do you agree to the terms?

---

Oh I am perfectly willing to argue against my "own points" with you


First how about you make a public poll in it's own thread asking about bradleys halftime adjustments so we can all get a huge roar of a laugh at the results


Then we shalt continue on, do you agree to the terms?

Except we were a second half team last year soooo

---

Oh I am perfectly willing to argue against my "own points" with you

 

First how about you make a public poll in it's own thread asking about bradleys halftime adjustments so we can all get a huge roar of a laugh at the results

 

Then we shalt continue on, do you agree to the terms?

It's your argument, why don't you make a poll and argue about it against yourself?

 

Then you can laugh at yourself like everyone else does.

---

If i were Khan, I would understand that the first 2 years of Gus's term really don't count for wins and losses, it was through a complete overhaul of the roster. It wouldn't be fair to hold him to the exact same standard those years as other coaches, but of course the average fan doesn't care about that. I'd say he knows that Gus and Dave have had enough time and enough players to have what should be the foundation we wanted to build.... with that said i think 7-8 wins and Gus will be head coach the following year... less than that and he's gone probably. Honestly i don't think he's should be fired based on just wins and losses this year but on the overall development of the team..

 

Also , Gus was brought in to help build this team... it would be a little unfair to not give him time to work with the more "completed" roster.

 

We'll also ignore his terrible season preparation each year, his lack of game preparation each week and his poor in-game management every game.  In reality, we probably shouldn't have any expectations for Gus nor hold him accountable for anything.  Nothing is really his fault at all.  I vote for a pay raise!

---

Give me a roster of all pros and I'll work for 25% of Gus's salary with better results.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

lol ^^^

---