Create Account

Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums The Gridiron The Home Team Allen Robinson a top 5 wr?..


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Allen Robinson a top 5 wr?..

#81
04-10-2016, 11:58 AM

Dont forget about Josh Gordon, looks like he might come back
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline imtheblkranger
    Hall of Famer

  • *******
  • Posts: 12,168
    Threads: 427
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Reputation: 344
#82
04-10-2016, 01:52 PM

Quote:Dont forget about Josh Gordon, looks like he might come back


Lol ok
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Reply

#83
04-10-2016, 01:57 PM

Quote:Lol ok
dont think Goodell will let him back?
Reply

#84
04-10-2016, 03:17 PM

What yall think Kevin White is gonna do this year?
Reply

  • Offline KYjaggy
    Quarantined - I'm infected. Stay away.

  • Posts: 6,182
    Threads: 85
    Joined: Apr 2010
    Reputation: 2
#85
04-10-2016, 03:52 PM

Yeah I'm taking Gordon, White, Parker, and Perriman all over Hurns without much hesitation.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline jaxjags625
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,923
    Threads: 51
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Reputation: 0
#86
04-10-2016, 07:08 PM

Quote:Yeah I'm taking Gordon, White, Parker, and Perriman all over Hurns without much hesitation.


Perriman and White without hesitation? 2 guys that haven't even seen the field yet?


Allen Hurns is still underrated I see.
Shock the world
Reply

#87
04-10-2016, 07:11 PM

Quote:Perriman and White without hesitation? 2 guys that haven't even seen the field yet?


Allen Hurns is still underrated I see.
Yeah was gonna post that earlier and forgot. I dont see how you can put 2 guys over Hurns that hasnt even seen the field yet and without hesitation at that.  Hurns is def. underrated by some I see
Reply

  • Offline KYjaggy
    Quarantined - I'm infected. Stay away.

  • Posts: 6,182
    Threads: 85
    Joined: Apr 2010
    Reputation: 2
#88
04-10-2016, 08:37 PM (This post was last modified: 04-10-2016, 08:38 PM by KYjaggy.)

Yup, and if we want to keep going with the hasn't seen the field yet idea I'm taking at least Treadwell, Doctson, and Coleman over Hurns too. 

 

Hurns really wasn't all that great outside of his exceedingly fluky TD streak. He's just a solid #2, in the like 35-45 overall range. 

Reply

  • Offline GlockBortles
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 2,827
    Threads: 34
    Joined: Dec 2014
    Reputation: 1
#89
04-10-2016, 08:40 PM

Quote:Yeah I'm taking Gordon, White, Parker, and Perriman all over Hurns without much hesitation.
Perriman loooooooool
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline GlockBortles
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 2,827
    Threads: 34
    Joined: Dec 2014
    Reputation: 1
#90
04-10-2016, 08:46 PM

Quote:Treadwell is being slept on because of his 40 time, but I think he's going to be a darn good WR.
I think him/doctson/coleman and prob others are gonna be good. But i think its almost certain they wont get taken top 5, which id like for no more than just to mix up the top 5-7 picks because its all QBs and D.
Reply

  • Offline jaxjags625
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,923
    Threads: 51
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Reputation: 0
#91
04-10-2016, 08:47 PM

Quote:Yup, and if we want to keep going with the hasn't seen the field yet idea I'm taking at least Treadwell, Doctson, and Coleman over Hurns too.


Hurns really wasn't all that great outside of his exceedingly fluky TD streak. He's just a solid #2, in the like 35-45 overall range.


Fluky TD streak? College players better than Hurns? Yikes man... That's low.
Shock the world
Reply

  • Offline Predator
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,773
    Threads: 13
    Joined: Mar 2005
    Reputation: 53
#92
04-10-2016, 09:00 PM

Quote:Yup, and if we want to keep going with the hasn't seen the field yet idea I'm taking at least Treadwell, Doctson, and Coleman over Hurns too. 

 

Hurns really wasn't all that great outside of his exceedingly fluky TD streak. He's just a solid #2, in the like 35-45 overall range. 
He was also a 1000 yard receiver. There aren't 35-45 receivers who can say that.
Reply

  • Offline KYjaggy
    Quarantined - I'm infected. Stay away.

  • Posts: 6,182
    Threads: 85
    Joined: Apr 2010
    Reputation: 2
#93
04-10-2016, 09:09 PM

Quote:He was also a 1000 yard receiver. There aren't 35-45 receivers who can say that.
Actually, if you want to use what is probably the best stat to measure this, catch yards per team pass attempt, Hurns was exactly 35th. 
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline jaxjags625
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,923
    Threads: 51
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Reputation: 0
#94
04-10-2016, 09:23 PM

Quote:Actually, if you want to use what is probably the best stat to measure this, catch yards per team pass attempt, Hurns was exactly 35th.


I'm sure Robinson and Thomas have nothing to do with that right?
Shock the world
Reply

  • Offline Predator
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,773
    Threads: 13
    Joined: Mar 2005
    Reputation: 53
#95
04-10-2016, 09:35 PM

Quote:Actually, if you want to use what is probably the best stat to measure this, catch yards per team pass attempt, Hurns was exactly 35th. 
No, the best stat to measure this is 1031 yards which is 24th.
Reply

  • Offline Predator
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,773
    Threads: 13
    Joined: Mar 2005
    Reputation: 53
#96
04-10-2016, 09:57 PM

Quote:Actually, if you want to use what is probably the best stat to measure this, catch yards per team pass attempt, Hurns was exactly 35th. 
Plus your list includes 7 TEs so compared to receivers he is actually 28th.
Reply

  • Offline jaxjags625
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,923
    Threads: 51
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Reputation: 0
#97
04-10-2016, 10:00 PM

Quote:No, the best stat to measure this is 1031 yards which is 24th.


What if you add TDs also?
Shock the world
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline Predator
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,773
    Threads: 13
    Joined: Mar 2005
    Reputation: 53
#98
04-10-2016, 10:03 PM (This post was last modified: 04-10-2016, 10:03 PM by Predator.)

Quote:What if you add TDs also?
That's just a fluke, remember?

Reply

  • Offline jaxjags625
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,923
    Threads: 51
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Reputation: 0
#99
04-10-2016, 10:04 PM

Quote:That's just a fluke, remember?


Ah forgot. You're right.
Shock the world
Reply

  • Offline pirkster
    Hall of Famer

  • *******
  • Posts: 11,177
    Threads: 118
    Joined: May 2006
    Reputation: 74
#100
04-10-2016, 10:15 PM

I think the biggest fluke will be KYjaggy getting his first ever evaluation right.

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Forum software by © MyBB - Theme © iAndrew 2017

ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!