Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Brissett better than BB

#1

Even some 3rd string jibroni NE cast off is better than our 3rd pick starting QB. Sad times.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

By far
Reply

#3

not even close

wonder what Bill would have wanted from us for him
Reply

#4

We probably could of traded Lee to them for him
Reply

#5

Care to revise any of these sentiments? Serious overreaction going on here. The guy has 2 tds and 2 ints in 3 starts. Not exactly a world beater.


Yes, it's improvement, but it's Blaine Gabbert 2012 level improvement. - Pirkster

http://youtu.be/ouGM3NWpjxk The Home Hypnotist!

http://youtu.be/XQRFkn0Ly3A Media on the Brain Link!
 
Quote:Peyton must store oxygen in that forehead of his. No way I'd still be alive after all that choking.
 
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

(10-01-2017, 11:54 PM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote: Care to revise any of these sentiments? Serious overreaction going on here. The guy has 2 tds and 2 ints in 3 starts. Not exactly a world beater.

He also failed to score any points in the second half at Seattle.
Reply

#7

(10-01-2017, 11:54 PM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote: Care to revise any of these sentiments? Serious overreaction going on here. The guy has 2 tds and 2 ints in 3 starts. Not exactly a world beater.

(10-02-2017, 06:44 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote:
(10-01-2017, 11:54 PM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote: Care to revise any of these sentiments? Serious overreaction going on here. The guy has 2 tds and 2 ints in 3 starts. Not exactly a world beater.

He also failed to score any points in the second half at Seattle.

He is basically a rookie playing on the road in Seattle in prime time, so no, I don't care to revise any of these sentiments. He throws a spiral, so he is already better than Bortles.
Reply

#8

Mechanics wise he is tons better. Sure he is making rookie mistakes and that is to be expected.
Reply

#9

(10-02-2017, 07:31 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [quote pid='1038342' dateline='1506984297']
He also failed to score any points in the second half at Seattle.

He is basically a rookie playing on the road in Seattle in prime time, so no, I don't care to revise any of these sentiments. He throws a spiral, so he is already better than Bortles.
[/quote]

No, Jacoby Brissett is not basically a rookie. He played in regular season games last year.

Also, Blake Bortles does throw a spiral - a pretty good one.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

Brissett is playing on the least talented team in the league. Yes the talent on paper is worse than the Browns. There is literally only 2 really good players on that roster and ones the kicker. (not counting Luck at this point)
Jaguars | Pacers | Purdue | Team USA

 


 

 
Reply

#11

(10-03-2017, 11:27 AM)Browntrouser Wrote: Brissett is playing on the least talented team in the league. Yes the talent on paper is worse than the Browns. There is literally only 2 really good players on that roster and ones the kicker. (not counting Luck at this point)

I am sure every NFL.com analyst thinks the least talented team is the Jets. While the Colts are rebuilding, the Jets are destructing.
Reply

#12

(10-03-2017, 12:42 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote:
(10-03-2017, 11:27 AM)Browntrouser Wrote: Brissett is playing on the least talented team in the league. Yes the talent on paper is worse than the Browns. There is literally only 2 really good players on that roster and ones the kicker. (not counting Luck at this point)

I am sure every NFL.com analyst thinks the least talented team is the Jets. While the Colts are rebuilding, the Jets are destructing.

The Jets just destructed the [BLEEP] out of us....
Reply

#13

(10-03-2017, 12:53 PM)Kane Wrote: The Jets just destructed the crap out of us....

One game does not make a season.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

(10-03-2017, 11:27 AM)Browntrouser Wrote: Brissett is playing on the least talented team in the league. Yes the talent on paper is worse than the Browns. There is literally only 2 really good players on that roster and ones the kicker. (not counting Luck at this point)

Kind of like what Bortles had to start off when he was with the Jags?  Cool.


 

Reply

#15

(10-03-2017, 01:11 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote:
(10-03-2017, 12:53 PM)Kane Wrote: The Jets just destructed the crap out of us....

One game does not make a season.

I'm just saying... I don't think the Jets are self-destructing like everyone thinks.
"tanking" or anything of the sort.
Reply

#16

(10-03-2017, 01:42 PM)Kane Wrote: I'm just saying . . . I don't think the Jets are self-destructing like everyone thinks.

"Tanking" or anything of the sort.

I did not mean the Jets are tanking on purpose. Stripping down like they have resulted in becoming the least talented team even if that was not their intent.
Reply

#17

(10-03-2017, 02:25 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote:
(10-03-2017, 01:42 PM)Kane Wrote: I'm just saying . . . I don't think the Jets are self-destructing like everyone thinks.

"Tanking" or anything of the sort.

I did not mean the Jets are tanking on purpose. Stripping down like they have resulted in becoming the least talented team even if that was not their intent.

Except they aren't the least talented team either.

A couple teams have looked even worse on their way to 1-3, 0-4 records.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

(10-03-2017, 02:44 PM)Kane Wrote:
(10-03-2017, 02:25 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: I did not mean the Jets are tanking on purpose. Stripping down like they have resulted in becoming the least talented team even if that was not their intent.

Except they aren't the least talented team either.

A couple teams have looked even worse on their way to 1-3, 0-4 records.

The 0-4 teams are the Browns, Chargers, Giants, and 49ers.

The 1-3 teams are the Bengals, Colts, and Bears.

What are your talent rankings of these seven teams?
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!