Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
How about this stat for Bortles- 2nd All Time Yards Per Run

#1
(This post was last modified: 11-28-2017, 10:41 PM by flgatorsandjags.)

All time yards a carry for a QB behind Vick

[Image: l2i9vik.jpg]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

(11-28-2017, 10:40 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: All time yards a carry for a QB behind Vick

[Image: l2i9vik.jpg]

Tells me we should be using the read option a lot more with him.
[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

#3

That's actually pretty crazy
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Reply

#4

(11-28-2017, 10:53 PM)EricC85 Wrote:
(11-28-2017, 10:40 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: All time yards a carry for a QB behind Vick

Tells me we should be using the read option a lot more with him.

I'm not sure it'd work every time, but it was very successful Sunday. He seems to do better with roll outs, and the read option suits his play style, so I think you're right.
Reply

#5

He is a pretty good runner but part of why his ypc is so high is he doesnt take off very often. Also the other sad reason is he does not kneel down very often.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

We need to utilize his running more. Play to his strengths.
Reply

#7
(This post was last modified: 11-29-2017, 08:59 AM by RicoTx.)

(11-28-2017, 11:12 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote:
(11-28-2017, 10:53 PM)EricC85 Wrote: Tells me we should be using the read option a lot more with him.

I'm not sure it'd work every time, but it was very successful Sunday. He seems to do better with roll outs, and the read option suits his play style, so I think you're right.

He threw his INT on a roll out to the right.

(11-29-2017, 08:50 AM)SamusAranX Wrote: We need to utilize his running more. Play to his strengths.

I would bet there are more read options called than we are aware of.  It's up to Bortles to make the decision on whether to keep or hand off on those calls.
[Image: IMG-1452.jpg]
Reply

#8
(This post was last modified: 11-29-2017, 09:07 AM by imtheblkranger.)

(11-29-2017, 08:56 AM)Rico Wrote:
(11-28-2017, 11:12 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: I'm not sure it'd work every time, but it was very successful Sunday. He seems to do better with roll outs, and the read option suits his play style, so I think you're right.

He threw his INT on a roll out to the right.

Sure, but that's the first INT out of the pocket in a long time. He didn't throw any on the move last year.

Unless I missed one this year before that, but I remember looking into this in the off-season and last year they were all from the pocket.
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Reply

#9

Blake runs like a giselle
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

He should have 3-5 designed keepers a game imo.
But then... they are playing russian roulette with his 19 mil injury clause.
Reply

#11

"As the trainers check on Bortles, Chad Henne is throwing on the sideline. We'll be right back."
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

#12

(12-01-2017, 09:15 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: "As the trainers check on Bortles, Chad Henne is throwing on the sideline. We'll be right back."

Except Bortles can take the hits. He's been behind a line that couldn't block for most of his time. I don't think running him a few extra plays is going to increase his injury chances that much. He's been sturdy so far.
Reply

#13

(11-28-2017, 10:40 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: All time yards a carry for a QB behind Vick

[Image: l2i9vik.jpg]

That is absolutely wrong.  Notice Cunningham is not on there at all.  Bortles is not close to Cunningham.
Bleeding Teal since 1995. The Icon Teal Time Radio aka ctjags

  #Gojags
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

Perhaps he would be better utilized as a tight end or full back.
Reply

#15

(12-02-2017, 11:01 AM)Teal Time Radio Wrote:
(11-28-2017, 10:40 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: All time yards a carry for a QB behind Vick

[Image: l2i9vik.jpg]

That is absolutely wrong.  Notice Cunningham is not on there at all.  Bortles is not close to Cunningham.

Cunningham averaged 8 yards per carry. This must only go back to 2000.
Reply

#16

Bortles is ahead of Cunningham.

775 for 4928, 6.4 yards per attempt.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randall_Cunningham
Reply

#17
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2017, 12:50 PM by Teal Time Radio.)

(12-02-2017, 12:44 PM)atburg Wrote: Bortles is ahead of Cunningham.

775 for 4928, 6.4 yards per attempt.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randall_Cunningham

Your out of your mind.  Cunningham was much better and faster than Vick.  My eyes don't deceive me. Wikipedia in this instance is wrong. Just like seen every jags game in its entirety. I watched every eagles game. And not even close. And Bortles is not even close.
Bleeding Teal since 1995. The Icon Teal Time Radio aka ctjags

  #Gojags
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2017, 01:09 PM by atburg.)

(12-02-2017, 12:48 PM)Teal Time Radio Wrote:
(12-02-2017, 12:44 PM)atburg Wrote: Bortles is ahead of Cunningham.

775 for 4928, 6.4 yards per attempt.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randall_Cunningham

Your out of your mind.  Cunningham was much better and faster than Vick.  My eyes don't deceive me. Wikipedia in this instance is wrong.  Just like seen every jags game in its entirety.   I watched every eagles game.  And not even close.  And Bortles is not even close.

How am I out of my mind? I would take Cunningham in a heartbeat as a runner. Simply provided the facts, which state he has a higher average, which is what the thread is based on!
Reply

#19

(12-02-2017, 12:48 PM)Teal Time Radio Wrote: Your out of your mind.  Cunningham was much better and faster than Vick.  My eyes don't deceive me. Wikipedia in this instance is wrong.  Just like seen every jags game in its entirety.   I watched every eagles game.  And not even close.  And Bortles is not even close.
Once again, you are wrong. Your eyes failed you again.

http://www.nfl.com/player/randallcunning...areerstats
Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 
Reply

#20
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2017, 01:24 PM by Teal Time Radio.)

https://youtu.be/KZEDa6pZwx8


Remember after watching this ya telling me Bortles is a better runner. Bortles don't even have as many rushing yards behind line of scrimmage as cunningham does.
Bleeding Teal since 1995. The Icon Teal Time Radio aka ctjags

  #Gojags
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!