The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Annual Site Wide Mock GM LOUNGE DISCUSSION
|
(03-27-2018, 03:08 PM)Jags02 Wrote:So which WRs do you want to get next to zero playing time? Our 1st rd pick? Our Biletnikoff Award winner and the preseason yardage leader? Our best performing WR last year who was also a rookie? Our $10 million FA signing? Our $16.5 million Free Agent signing?(03-27-2018, 12:15 PM)JNev Wrote: So you believe the front office will allow the guy they paid $16.5 million guaranteed to be benched? Much less in enough time to make Ridley or any 1st rd WR a worthwhile pick? Lets also consider this WR class is one of the weakest in awhile and Ridley is now the 3rd WR to come off the board. Then add to that we are a run heavy offense who would love to run the ball every single play if they could. Continuing, we drafted the Biletnikoff Award winner and added a UDFA who finished 3rd in rookie WR yardage last year in our aforementioned run heavy offense. IT's simply utter non-sense to consider a WR in the 1st round. We are NOT going to burn a 1st rd pick to go 5 deep at WR. I would a million times rather grab an OL or TE than pick someone who would suppress the development of our younger guys we got last year, because with the money invested in them, Moncrief and Lee are the #1 and #2 whether any of you like it or not. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (03-27-2018, 03:46 PM)JNev Wrote:(03-27-2018, 03:08 PM)Jags02 Wrote:So which WRs do you want to get next to zero playing time? Our 1st rd pick? Our Biletnikoff Award winner and the preseason yardage leader? Our best performing WR last year who was also a rookie? Our $10 million FA signing? Our $16.5 million Free Agent signing? LOL Which one? Blackmon? Lee? You are creating a problem that doesn't exist by the way. I want you to write this on the chalk board 100 times, OK? Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem. Too many good receivers is not a problem... ( I really don't think they'll select a receiver in round one BTW)
For the record I am completely against WR in the first and am DJ Moore>> Ridley.
I also believe you can never have enough competent WRs. The more you have the more effective you will be.
Moore > Sutton > Washington is the first tier of WRs to me. I wouldn't quibble with anyone who had Sutton over Moore though.
Ridley doesn't belong in their conversation IMO.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(03-27-2018, 04:12 PM)Upper Wrote: Moore > Sutton > Washington is the first tier of WRs to me. I wouldn't quibble with anyone who had Sutton over Moore though. Moved Ridley ahead of Washington after another few watches. Can see Ridley getting production much easier than Washington in the NFL.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (03-27-2018, 05:01 PM)JagFanatic24 Wrote:(03-27-2018, 04:38 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: You guys want to vote on the Vikings pick? Let's give him 'til 8 pm and then we'll vote. In the meantime, I'd really like to have a good discussion on the pick first. BTW, my wife asked me what the Jaguars are looking for in the draft. I said... "pretty much everything except for a RB on offense or maybe a LB on defense." I told her I was basically looking at a couple WRs, a couple QBs, a couple TEs, a couple Gs, a couple OTs and a couple LBs.
'02
(03-27-2018, 05:20 PM)Jags02 Wrote:He has been on for a while today and was on different threads. We should keep this thing moving imo. We will never even make it threw 2 rounds if we give everyone this much time. Its not like he hasnt been on.(03-27-2018, 05:01 PM)JagFanatic24 Wrote: Yeah bro. He is taking too long. (03-27-2018, 04:01 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:I think he is referring to Dede Westbrook.(03-27-2018, 03:46 PM)JNev Wrote: So which WRs do you want to get next to zero playing time? Our 1st rd pick? Our Biletnikoff Award winner and the preseason yardage leader? Our best performing WR last year who was also a rookie? Our $10 million FA signing? Our $16.5 million Free Agent signing?
(03-27-2018, 05:56 PM)jjah34 Wrote:(03-27-2018, 04:01 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: LOLI think he is referring to Dede Westbrook. Def. wasnt Lee, dont think it was Westbrook. It had to of been Blackmon We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (03-27-2018, 05:56 PM)jjah34 Wrote:(03-27-2018, 04:01 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: LOLI think he is referring to Dede Westbrook. I was attempting humor. I know what he meant. Never seen someone so upset over the prospect of five good receivers on one team. How dare they sit a Biletnikoff winner to play (gulp) another Biletnikoff winner?? LOL (03-27-2018, 05:52 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:(03-27-2018, 05:20 PM)Jags02 Wrote: Let's give him 'til 8 pm and then we'll vote.He has been on for a while today and was on different threads. We should keep this thing moving imo. We will never even make it threw 2 rounds if we give everyone this much time. Its not like he hasnt been on. 8:00 is less than an hour away, and nobody is even discussing the pick. Why the urgency?
'02
Somebody make the pick. Vikings have Cook coming back. I think they will select Moore, WR.
CBS just updated their team draft needs and the Vikings #1 was RT/G, so I throw my vote toward Connor Williams as well.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
If a team is comfortable with Hurst's heart condition then he is a steal at this point for sure.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
5 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.