Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
19 foreign nationals charged with illegal voting during 2016 election

#1

And the Democrats think this doesn't happen? These are just the poeple that got caught......

19 foreign nationals charged with illegal voting during 2016 election

Nineteen foreign nationals have been charged with illegal voting in the 2016 election, the Justice Department said Friday.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/...ction.html
Is currently experiencing life at several What the F's per hour
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

GOP failed in attempt to suppress the black vote. I find that much more interesting.
Only a chump boos the home team!
Reply

#3
(This post was last modified: 08-25-2018, 08:01 AM by TurndownforWatt.)

(08-24-2018, 11:16 PM)Kotite Wrote: GOP failed in attempt to suppress the black vote. I find that much more interesting.

If you're so interested in it, can you please provide a link so we know what you're specifically talking about?

(08-24-2018, 04:01 PM)The Drifter Wrote: And the Democrats think this doesn't happen? These are just the poeple that got caught......

19 foreign nationals charged with illegal voting during 2016 election

Nineteen foreign nationals have been charged with illegal voting in the 2016 election, the Justice Department said Friday.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/...ction.html

Democrats and voter fraud... shocking!
Reply

#4

(08-24-2018, 11:16 PM)Kotite Wrote: GOP failed in attempt to suppress the black vote. I find that much more interesting.

And when trying to boost votes in an election this makes sense how? Especially when attempting to earn the vote of the second largest race demographic. 

All sqeak and no substance in your post as usual.
[Image: Ben-Roethlisberger_Lerentee-McCary-Sack_...ayoffs.jpg]
Reply

#5
(This post was last modified: 08-25-2018, 10:43 AM by homebiscuit.)

(08-25-2018, 08:44 AM)B2hibry Wrote:
(08-24-2018, 11:16 PM)Kotite Wrote: GOP failed in attempt to suppress the black vote. I find that much more interesting.

And when trying to boost votes in an election this makes sense how? Especially when attempting to earn the vote of the second largest race demographic. 

All sqeak and no substance in your post as usual.

This is just a watered down version of the spittle-flecked lies promoted by some on the left after the Bush/Gore election. I'm sorry, (s)election, Rolleyes . Anyway, there were rampant stories floating around the leftist online hateverse (and some mainstream media) that there were armed roadblocks with attack dogs turning black voters away from the polls. 
This would prompt any thinking person to remark "you can't make this stuff up", but they sure as heck did.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

(08-24-2018, 04:01 PM)The Drifter Wrote: And the Democrats think this doesn't happen? These are just the poeple that got caught......

19 foreign nationals charged with illegal voting during 2016 election

Nineteen foreign nationals have been charged with illegal voting in the 2016 election, the Justice Department said Friday.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/...ction.html

Democrats have never denied that voter fraud exists.
They are denying that it exists in high enough numbers to swing an actual election.  This story is evidence in favor of their position, actually.  As hard as it is to prove a negative, here a grand jury apparently went over things with a fine-toothed comb and only got 19 cases.  They need to get over 1000 in a single county before it's something that could swing an election.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#7

Another stellar thread started by Drifter!

Keep up the good work dude.
Reply

#8
(This post was last modified: 08-25-2018, 04:57 PM by mikesez.)

(08-25-2018, 10:42 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:
(08-25-2018, 08:44 AM)B2hibry Wrote: And when trying to boost votes in an election this makes sense how? Especially when attempting to earn the vote of the second largest race demographic. 

All sqeak and no substance in your post as usual.

This is just a watered down version of the spittle-flecked lies promoted by some on the left after the Bush/Gore election. I'm sorry, (s)election, Rolleyes . Anyway, there were rampant stories floating around the leftist online hateverse (and some mainstream media) that there were armed roadblocks with attack dogs turning black voters away from the polls. 
This would prompt any thinking person to remark "you can't make this stuff up", but they sure as heck did.

What I heard was that people at polling stations on Jacksonville's Northside were very insistent that voters had to vote on every page, even though the presidential candidates were spread out over two pages. no one was able to get to the bottom off if the people giving bad information were with the supervisor's office or were observers from the Republican Party. Regardless, an extraordinary number of over-votes were thrown out in those areas that year, and the supervisor destroyed all of the ballots the very minute he was legally allowed to do so, before the Gore campaign became aware of the problem. That last part was reported in the Florida Times-Union at the time.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#9
(This post was last modified: 08-25-2018, 05:47 PM by B2hibry.)

(08-25-2018, 10:46 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(08-24-2018, 04:01 PM)The Drifter Wrote: And the Democrats think this doesn't happen? These are just the poeple that got caught......

19 foreign nationals charged with illegal voting during 2016 election

Nineteen foreign nationals have been charged with illegal voting in the 2016 election, the Justice Department said Friday.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/...ction.html

Democrats have never denied that voter fraud exists.
They are denying that it exists in high enough numbers to swing an actual election.  This story is evidence in favor of their position, actually.  As hard as it is to prove a negative, here a grand jury apparently went over things with a fine-toothed comb and only got 19 cases.  They need to get over 1000 in a single county before it's something that could swing an election.

Yes, they did in fact deny it existed. They bashed Trump and GOP for even suggesting such a thing. I’m sure we all remember the last POTUS actually encouraging voter fraud in his TV interview. Until now, fraud was not being investigated on a larger scale, which is the reason for low numbers. The immediate destruction or lack of hard evidence is another. A proper system of accountability may be in order but there goes the Dems plausible deniability.

I’m curious to see what kind of pushback arises when the topic of mandatory voter IDs comes up again. Seems between all this fraud and collusion it would be the perfect “comprehensive” solution.

(08-25-2018, 04:53 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: Another stellar thread started by Drifter!

Keep up the good work dude.
Thumbs up for another informative response!
[Image: Ben-Roethlisberger_Lerentee-McCary-Sack_...ayoffs.jpg]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

Trump said there were 3 million illegal voters, right? Is this like when he said he had the biggest inauguration?
Only a chump boos the home team!
Reply

#11

(08-25-2018, 05:46 PM)B2hibry Wrote:
(08-25-2018, 10:46 AM)mikesez Wrote: Democrats have never denied that voter fraud exists.
They are denying that it exists in high enough numbers to swing an actual election.  This story is evidence in favor of their position, actually.  As hard as it is to prove a negative, here a grand jury apparently went over things with a fine-toothed comb and only got 19 cases.  They need to get over 1000 in a single county before it's something that could swing an election.

Yes, they did in fact deny it existed. They bashed Trump and GOP for even suggesting such a thing. I’m sure we all remember the last POTUS actually encouraging voter fraud in his TV interview. Until now, fraud was not being investigated on a larger scale, which is the reason for low numbers. The immediate destruction or lack of hard evidence is another. A proper system of accountability may be in order but there goes the Dems plausible deniability.

I’m curious to see what kind of pushback arises when the topic of mandatory voter IDs comes up again. Seems between all this fraud and collusion it would be the perfect “comprehensive” solution.

The President was bashed for suggesting that voter fraud had a significant effect.  It didn't, and he should be smart enough to know that.

I don't know what you mean by "mandatory voter ID." Isn't that what Florida has had for about 20 years now?
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#12

(08-26-2018, 01:26 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(08-25-2018, 05:46 PM)B2hibry Wrote: Yes, they did in fact deny it existed. They bashed Trump and GOP for even suggesting such a thing. I’m sure we all remember the last POTUS actually encouraging voter fraud in his TV interview. Until now, fraud was not being investigated on a larger scale, which is the reason for low numbers. The immediate destruction or lack of hard evidence is another. A proper system of accountability may be in order but there goes the Dems plausible deniability.

I’m curious to see what kind of pushback arises when the topic of mandatory voter IDs comes up again. Seems between all this fraud and collusion it would be the perfect “comprehensive” solution.

The President was bashed for suggesting that voter fraud had a significant effect.  It didn't, and he should be smart enough to know that.

I don't know what you mean by "mandatory voter ID." Isn't that what Florida has had for about 20 years now?

You can't say "it didn't" anymore than Trump could say it did. There isn't enough accounting to know how many people voted illegally. That's especially true in California, where well over 3 million foreign nationals have drivers licences and thus could also have slipped past the registration system. 19 people were caught, but "caught" is usually a small percentage of the total of any crime. And North Carolina has probably fewer foreign nationals than average.

So yeah, voted fraud could be a problem, and there could have been 3 million illegal votes cast in California. It's much likely a lot less, but not an insignificant number. We can't know for sure unless there are stronger safeguards in place. You clearly are one of the Leftists who opposes such safeguards.




                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply

#13

(08-26-2018, 02:05 PM)MalabarJag Wrote:
(08-26-2018, 01:26 PM)mikesez Wrote: The President was bashed for suggesting that voter fraud had a significant effect.  It didn't, and he should be smart enough to know that.

I don't know what you mean by "mandatory voter ID." Isn't that what Florida has had for about 20 years now?

You can't say "it didn't" anymore than Trump could say it did. There isn't enough accounting to know how many people voted illegally. That's especially true in California, where well over 3 million foreign nationals have drivers licences and thus could also have slipped past the registration system. 19 people were caught, but "caught" is usually a small percentage of the total of any crime. And North Carolina has probably fewer foreign nationals than average.

So yeah, voted fraud could be a problem, and there could have been 3 million illegal votes cast in California. It's much likely a lot less, but not an insignificant number. We can't know for sure unless there are stronger safeguards in place. You clearly are one of the Leftists who opposes such safeguards.

Well what safeguards are we talking about? I think Florida does a good job.  What more need to be done? Don't presume I don't want more to be done.  Ask.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

(08-26-2018, 02:33 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(08-26-2018, 02:05 PM)MalabarJag Wrote: You can't say "it didn't" anymore than Trump could say it did. There isn't enough accounting to know how many people voted illegally. That's especially true in California, where well over 3 million foreign nationals have drivers licences and thus could also have slipped past the registration system. 19 people were caught, but "caught" is usually a small percentage of the total of any crime. And North Carolina has probably fewer foreign nationals than average.

So yeah, voted fraud could be a problem, and there could have been 3 million illegal votes cast in California. It's much likely a lot less, but not an insignificant number. We can't know for sure unless there are stronger safeguards in place. You clearly are one of the Leftists who opposes such safeguards.

Well what safeguards are we talking about? I think Florida does a good job.  What more need to be done? Don't presume I don't want more to be done.  Ask.

You were defending the status quo that allowed illegal voting in North Carolina, so my presumption was backed by your rhetoric. And yet you still didn't say you wanted more done. But that's no surprise from a fake Republican.

I agree that Florida does a good job. I don't know whether or not that's enough, but there haven't been any illegal votes cast in Florida recently that I know of. State issued drivers licenses with photographs  that are almost impossible to counterfeit should work. In the past it was just assumed that merely voting was not worth the risk of getting caught, but in today's political hate-fest that's no longer true.



                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!