The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Fowler Traded
|
Don't like the move. I understand why they did it, but not happy they traded a talented edge rusher.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
I don’t know guys. I’m not a fan of this trade. If the truth be told, this was over the first day of his rookie training camp when he tore his ACL. That gave Yan his chance and the rest is history once we signed Campbell.
I guess they plan on keeping Smith Jack and Ramsey together for the next 5-7 years. And keeping Yan of course, too. (10-30-2018, 10:11 PM)JagFan81 Wrote: Well my 2 cents is this a pretty good deal. He was going to go in the off season, I'm sure Fowler would test the market unless we offer him something crazy anyway. To get a 3rd this year and a 5th next is pretty good, we were going to get nothing.
I think the bigger question is what this means for the teams outlook over the next few years. Is this the first step in a mini-rebuild and finding draft capital to go get another QB or are we just looking at capitalizing on the last chance to get something in the 2019 draft for a player we weren't planning on keeping. I personally don't like it for the fact that now we don't really have a sub rusher for the strong side. Calais kicks in, malik moves to nose. I haven't seen anything from Bryant to put him out there. Is it McCray?
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (10-31-2018, 01:16 AM)jj82284 Wrote: ... I personally don't like it for the fact that now we don't really have a sub rusher for the strong side. Calais kicks in, malik moves to nose. I haven't seen anything from Bryant to put him out there. Is it McCray? McCray has had reps there and looked good. Probably will see some rotation with him, Smoot and Bryan.
Wouldn’t the absolute value be a top 3 pick traded for a 3rd and 5th round pick. If we had the 3rd pick in 2019 and immediately traded for a 3rd and 5th round pick, no one would be happy with that. I agree it was a necessary move, just don’t think the overall 3 year value to a top 3 pick was achieved.
(10-30-2018, 07:03 PM)Jagsfan32277 Wrote:(10-30-2018, 05:37 PM)DragonFury Wrote: Tanking how? Fowler has been a rotational player with minimal impact all season. His best play was the strip sack on Brady in a game we were going to win anyway. I've heard that argument before...about Derrick Harvey. (10-30-2018, 05:15 PM)JagFanFirst Wrote: We now pick four times in the first three rounds. I like it. Already we've drafted Hyde with a fifth round pick, and Kessler with a seventh. Could be a nice haul next year. I still like both these trades. Kessler may be nothing but a backup, but he can come in and win games when necessary. If Fournette somehow stays healthy next season, a combo of he and Hyde should wear down defenses by the 4th quarter. Yeldon will be leaving via free agency so Hyde should get a lot of carries and hopefully they keep Grant on the roster as a speed guy. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
It's so funny to me how the national media works. Listening to the Dan Patrick Show this morning and I've never heard Dante Fowler's name mentioned more in my life.
Honestly? I feel like I'll miss that raw potential ability for him to get loose and create havoc on the field. Even if it wasn't always frequent...
But I definitely won't miss his off-field character. He's a hothead who's been thrown out of multiple games and has had clashes with teammates for varying reasons. Talented player, sucks to lose him. And I'm glad the team's not just drafting choir boys anymore. But sometimes you gotta just let some dudes go. Fowler wasn't worth being paid a big contract for how little he's brought over the past few years. He's good but not great. And if he's gonna continue to be an [BLEEP] on and off the field, you have to ask yourself at what point does his talent make that headache worthwhile? He's the Rams' problem to deal with now. Maybe he takes off or maybe he plummets. At this point it's hard not to look back at that first round pick and cringe thinking about it though
Saw YannGetsSacks91 at Publix. He said he was 91% sure that if they didn't trade Dante that he was going to kick the [BLEEP] out of him.
Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (10-30-2018, 06:01 PM)jaguarmvp Wrote:(10-30-2018, 05:49 PM)FBT Wrote: A Ferrari that lost an axle before it saw any real race time, and when it finally got back on the field, it still wasn't living up to the reputation of a Ferrari for a couple of years. Company man. That's the label simpletons must throw out there anytime they are required to think. I'm not a company man, but if that's all you can come back with, it's understood why. I would suggest you leave clever to those who can. It's not your strong suit. Stick to starting mindless threads daily. It's what you do. Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
(10-31-2018, 01:16 AM)jj82284 Wrote: I think the bigger question is what this means for the teams outlook over the next few years. Is this the first step in a mini-rebuild and finding draft capital to go get another QB or are we just looking at capitalizing on the last chance to get something in the 2019 draft for a player we weren't planning on keeping. I personally don't like it for the fact that now we don't really have a sub rusher for the strong side. Calais kicks in, malik moves to nose. I haven't seen anything from Bryant to put him out there. Is it McCray? We knew there was going to be at least a minor rebuilding next year based on the fact that some of those big contracts on the defensive side of the ball are going to need to be moved. Fowler didn't factor into the future, so trading him made sense, and it did indeed give the team some draft capital to make some moves if they are targeting a specific player. Bryan needs to develop. Trading Fowler might wind up helping his development by getting those extra snaps. Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
(10-30-2018, 07:39 PM)jagforlife85 Wrote:(10-30-2018, 05:49 PM)FBT Wrote: A Ferrari that lost an axle before it saw any real race time, and when it finally got back on the field, it still wasn't living up to the reputation of a Ferrari for a couple of years. I've never said Caldwell doesn't deserve criticism for his draft failures in the first round. I'm simply pointing out that things got off to a bad start with Fowler because of an injury that sidelined him for a year, and for which he was slow to get back to full speed afterward. (10-30-2018, 10:27 PM)JAGFAN88 Wrote:(10-30-2018, 10:14 PM)YourFather Wrote: Fowler was probably one of the most overlooked players in this defense. I wouldnt be suprised if the defense takes a toll. Fowler is a guy who is a physical specimen with the mentality of a 12 year old. He had become a distraction in the locker room with his off field issues and the tension he created with 91. Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
(10-31-2018, 12:54 AM)spmakros Wrote:(10-30-2018, 10:11 PM)JagFan81 Wrote: Well my 2 cents is this a pretty good deal. He was going to go in the off season, I'm sure Fowler would test the market unless we offer him something crazy anyway. To get a 3rd this year and a 5th next is pretty good, we were going to get nothing. Fowler has talent, we took him #3 for a reason. What I'm saying is he was a solid rotational guy for us, who never took over a position or became a key part of the D. He made some plays but he had plenty of quiet games. Does anyone think he should be starting ahead of Yannick? We weren't going to offer him $10m a year so he would have tested free agency anyway. To get something for him is better than the nothing we would have got. I'd love to find a way to keep everyone but you can't. The main thing is this team doesn't put itself into cap problems. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (10-30-2018, 05:49 PM)FBT Wrote:Why are people down on Caldwell? Coughlin had to agree to the terms and conditions and the trade itself but no one wants to mention him.Coughlin must have been ok with this move or it wouldn't have happened but it's much easier to just blame Caldwell as if it was all Caldwell and no Coughlin that made this move. It's a good move, work it Dave!!!(10-30-2018, 05:44 PM)jaguarmvp Wrote: This is the equivalent of Buying a Ferrari and trading it in 3 years later for a honda civic and a pinto.
I would have rather traded another player instead of Fowler. However, if he is a nut case then I don’t want him on my team. If what people are saying is true, then he is actually bad for a team like the Jags.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.