The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Early Mocks...Post and Debate
|
(03-18-2020, 06:03 PM)Bullseye Wrote: One of the least appealing mocks I have ever seen associated with us... Absolutely hideous mock draft. Pitiful. Putrid. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (03-18-2020, 06:07 PM)enigma Wrote:(03-18-2020, 06:03 PM)Bullseye Wrote: One of the least appealing mocks I have ever seen associated with us... Yeah... Just no.
(03-18-2020, 04:13 PM)Kane Wrote:(03-18-2020, 03:56 PM)MojoKing Wrote: Mock Yeah the more and more I think, I like Ruggs fitting nicely with Chark. I'm wondering if we even consider Ruggs at 9? But, I DO think we will trade up in round 1 for someone. It depends who we pick at 9, but I can see a Ruggs-Kinlaw combo We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (03-18-2020, 06:03 PM)Bullseye Wrote: One of the least appealing mocks I have ever seen associated with us... why did you expose the rest of us to that contagion? lordy. (03-18-2020, 06:03 PM)Bullseye Wrote: One of the least appealing mocks I have ever seen associated with us... At first glance I was like "hey this isn't that bad... Becton, Gladney..." then the wheels fell off.... Where'd those picks come from...Marlon Davidson? Jeremy Chinn?? (LB/S Hybrid??) the Duvernay pick screams "we don't know this roster at all" as does a QB in round 6 I swear for god if we waste a pick on a late round QB............ (03-19-2020, 09:56 AM)Kane Wrote:(03-18-2020, 06:03 PM)Bullseye Wrote: One of the least appealing mocks I have ever seen associated with us... Its not that bad, even if I'd choose different players. Davidson and Chinn are both good. Becton and Lewis would be great for the line. Gladney will be a shutdown corner. Davidson can play big end and 3 tech. It's also likely both conley and Dede are gone in a year and even if not they can be upgraded (03-19-2020, 10:22 AM)JackCity Wrote:(03-19-2020, 09:56 AM)Kane Wrote: At first glance I was like "hey this isn't that bad... Becton, Gladney..." Chinn might be good, but where on our D do we need a LB/S hybrid? Why do you assume DeDe is gone after this year? Conley, sure, and I'm all about adding a WR in this deep draft, I just think there are better ones to add. I'm actually OK with Gandy-Golden as a jar on the shelf WR. As I said, I was good with the first two picks... the rest was underwhelming, at best. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (03-19-2020, 11:45 AM)Kane Wrote:(03-19-2020, 10:22 AM)JackCity Wrote: Its not that bad, even if I'd choose different players. Davidson and Chinn are both good. He can just play safety , can move him around, use vs TEs, mix in 3 safety looks. Because Dedes contract will be up and he isn't good. Wouldn't be difficult to upgrade. So in this scenario you come out with: Starting LT Starting RG Starting corner Starting Calais replacement Then two WR fliers + versatile safety. I would pick different players probably but the thought process was sound for me (03-19-2020, 12:04 PM)JackCity Wrote:(03-19-2020, 11:45 AM)Kane Wrote: Chinn might be good, but where on our D do we need a LB/S hybrid? I disagree that DeDe "isn't good" he had a bit of a down year last year but I still think he's a viable starter going forward. Will need a good 2020 campaign for sure. So you're putting Chinn in at FS over Wilson, or moving Harrison to FS and playing Chinn as SS? Or using that pick on a backup? And then why Tanner Muse late? (I think we can get starters from first 3 rounds this draft.) Damien Lewis gets penciled in as starter for the RG position? If he's that good of a guard, why would he last til round 4 I wonder If you select a LT at 9, Cam Robinson is probably moving to guard. And if you would pick different players why are you defending this draft so vehemently? Just to argue with someone? lol I stand by my "not a fan" take. Starting OL guy and CB are great... afterwards I'm not sure how we pick those guys when many of the TDN mocks I have done have much better players/fits/value in most of those rounds 3-5 picks. And drafting a QB late is a wasted pick imo. Which you seem to gloss over. (03-19-2020, 12:16 PM)Kane Wrote:(03-19-2020, 12:04 PM)JackCity Wrote: ... He also played through two separate injuries in 2019. (03-19-2020, 01:15 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:(03-19-2020, 12:16 PM)Kane Wrote: I disagree that DeDe "isn't good" he had a bit of a down year last year but I still think he's a viable starter going forward. Will need a good 2020 campaign for sure. Yeah, missed a whole game plus played through shoulder and neck injuries and still had 66 catches and 660 yards... We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
R1P9
CB JEFFREY OKUDAH OHIO STATE 18: R1P18 WR HENRY RUGGS III ALABAMA 42: R2P10 EDGE ZACK BAUN WISCONSIN 73: R3P9 RB CLYDE EDWARDS-HELAIRE LSU 88: R3P24 S ASHTYN DAVIS CALIFORNIA 137: R4P31 G DAMIEN LEWIS LSU 140: R4P34 DL BENITO JONES MISSISSIPPI 157: R5P11 LB SHAQUILLE QUARTERMAN MIAMI 223: R7P9 DL KHALIL DAVIS NEBRASKA My latest effort... Interestingly, Andrew Thomas was there at 21, would be a great if the Eagles traded us that pick for Yann.
My latest mock from walkthemock.com for JAX via Default ranking
1:9 - OT Tristan Wirfs, Iowa 1:20 - DL Derrick Brown, Auburn 2:10 - CB Jaylon Johnson, Utah 3:9 - TE Brycen Hopkins, Purdue 4:10 - WR Chase Claypool, Notre Dame 4:31 - FS David Dowell, Michigan State 4:34 - CB Mike Hampton, South Florida 5:19 - EDGE Darrell Taylor, Tennessee 5:24 - C Darryl Williams, Mississippi State 6:10 - WR Isaiah Hodgins, Oregon St. 6:27 - DL LaBryan Ray, Alabama 7:9 - RB J.J. Taylor, Arizona What a slide by Brown here... can't see it happening but steal of the draft if so, imo. Wirfs locked in as a mauler of a RG, Brown solidifies the inside of the DL. Johnson is our CB 1 Hopkins adds another TE to our group that is a receiving threat. Claypool adds talent to our WR group. Everything else is depth, STs, and jars on the shelf for the future. I don't see us making all these selections. We'll be moving around in this draft and using some later round picks to move up in mid rounds would likely benefit us the most. (03-19-2020, 12:16 PM)Kane Wrote:(03-19-2020, 12:04 PM)JackCity Wrote: He can just play safety , can move him around, use vs TEs, mix in 3 safety looks. Hes not "good". He's a solid #3/#4 option who, based on everything we have seen, can be easily upgraded. We play combo safeties now so doesn't matter as much where they play but yeah I'd put Chinn and Ronnie together and mix in a lot of 3 safety looks where it's Wilson and Ronnie with Chinn playing as a big nickel eventually. Or vice versa. I'd say Lewis goes anywhere from round 3 to round 4, and is starting caliber I believe. Him going round 4 wouldn't change that for me. And I don't really care where Cam goes with Becton at LT, it's more likely than not he's not a starting caliber interior. Lol I'm defending it because it makes a lot of sense. Fixed the Oline with two guys I like, gets an above average starting corner , some WRs I rate too. Good use of positional value and depth of class. And way late rounds I don't really care who we take but sure I probably would take one
The problem is that we have so many holes to fix, that any choice would "make sense" and thereby fix that positional issue.
Other than the Becton pick, that mock is just atrocious. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
https://www.draftsite.com/nfl/mock-draft/2020/
(03-18-2020, 07:45 PM)JAGFAN4EVER! Wrote: Is that Gene Smith working that Mock Draft. LOL!!!!! The question that leapt to miy mind is "What did we ever do to him ti deserve this? (03-18-2020, 07:51 PM)enigma Wrote:(03-18-2020, 07:45 PM)JAGFAN4EVER! Wrote: Is that Gene Smith working that Mock Draft. LOL!!!!! At least Shack had his good picks-mostly eound 2 and later. This guy?!? Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
(03-19-2020, 09:56 AM)Kane Wrote:(03-18-2020, 06:03 PM)Bullseye Wrote: One of the least appealing mocks I have ever seen associated with us... I think he botched things from the beginning. I don't trust Becton at LT. Granted I don't trust Taylor at RT yet, either, but I would hope if we spent a top 10 pick on a T it would be a LT. I have little problem with the Duvernay and Lewis picks. Duvernay arguably addresses a lesser need and takes advantage of the receiver depth in this class. Lewis has been a favorite of mine since January. A LB/S hybrid? Didn't we just draft that last year? Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
9: R1P9
CB JEFF OKUDAH OHIO STATE 20: R1P20 WR JUSTIN JEFFERSON LSU 42: R2P10 OT AUSTIN JACKSON USC 73: R3P9 DL JORDAN ELLIOTT MISSOURI 116: R4P10 TE HUNTER BRYANT WASHINGTON 137: R4P31 RB KE'SHAWN VAUGHN VANDERBILT 140: R4P34 DL BENITO JONES OLE MISS 157: R5P11 C KEITH ISMAEL SAN DIEGO STATE 165: R5P19 S L'JARIUS SNEED LOUISIANA TECH 189: R6P10 LB WILLIE GAY, JR. MISSISSIPPI STATE 206: R6P27 OT CALVIN THROCKMORTON OREGON 223: R7P9 QB COLE MCDONALD HAWAII |
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.