Wearing a hat. Not chasing anyone. Not assaulting anyone. Anybody on this board going to rationalize why a man should be shot for wearing a hat? This is all brought about by leftist ideology. Words are violence, right?

I can't make out what is being shouted before the gunshots. I've seen no context to the incident yet, although it probably doesn't justify the killing.

---

Wearing a hat. Not chasing anyone. Not assaulting anyone. Anybody on this board going to rationalize why a man should be shot for wearing a hat? This is all brought about by leftist ideology. Words are violence, right?

It doesn't make sense.. feels like the start of some action or mystery movie. I hope they catch the [BLEEP] who pulled the trigger.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Wearing a hat. Not chasing anyone. Not assaulting anyone. Anybody on this board going to rationalize why a man should be shot for wearing a hat? This is all brought about by leftist ideology. Words are violence, right?

I can't make out what is being shouted before the gunshots. I've seen no context to the incident yet, although it probably doesn't justify the killing.

https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/129...26080?s=19

---

I can't make out what is being shouted before the gunshots. I've seen no context to the incident yet, although it probably doesn't justify the killing.

https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/129...26080?s=19

I see a political ad coming.

---

The left will condemn a 17 year old as a white supremacist who was defending himself...

but when a man wearing a hat is murdered for no reason except for what he was wearing? Crickets. The left on this board are just as evil as the left at large.

---

The left will condemn a 17 year old as a white supremacist who was defending himself...

but when a man wearing a hat is murdered for no reason except for what he was wearing? Crickets. The left on this board are just as evil as the left at large.

It's not evil. They are simply employing the tactics they were taught in their years of attendance at the tax payer funded liberal indoctrination system that is our public schools.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

The left will condemn a 17 year old as a white supremacist who was defending himself...

but when a man wearing a hat is murdered for no reason except for what he was wearing? Crickets. The left on this board are just as evil as the left at large.

I don't know if he was a white supremacist, but, per Wisconsin law, he was obligated to retreat and to use the least lethal means available to him if he wants to claim self-defense.  Should have used the butt end of his rifle if he didn't want to be on trial for murder.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

The left will condemn a 17 year old as a white supremacist who was defending himself...

but when a man wearing a hat is murdered for no reason except for what he was wearing? Crickets. The left on this board are just as evil as the left at large.

I don't know if he was a white supremacist, but, per Wisconsin law, he was obligated to retreat and to use the least lethal means available to him if he wants to claim self-defense.  Should have used the butt end of his rifle if he didn't want to be on trial for murder.

You watch too many movies.

---

And he talks about the 17 year old instead of the murder of a man wearing a hat.

That's evil.

---

I don't know if he was a white supremacist, but, per Wisconsin law, he was obligated to retreat and to use the least lethal means available to him if he wants to claim self-defense.  Should have used the butt end of his rifle if he didn't want to be on trial for murder.

You watch too many movies.

No, I read too many state statutes. The kid was disobeying a lawful order to stay inside for a curfew, and he was too young to legally carry a rifle. those two facts reduce the level of self-defense that Wisconsin law permits him to exercise.

---

And he talks about the 17 year old instead of the murder of a man wearing a hat.

That's evil.

I already commented on the poor guy in the hat.  If they figure out who pulled the trigger, I hope they get the death penalty  - unless there's some mitigating circumstance we don't know about at the moment.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

You watch too many movies.

No, I read too many state statutes.  The kid was disobeying a lawful order to stay inside for a curfew, and he was too young to legally carry a rifle. those two facts reduce the level of self-defense that Wisconsin law permits him to exercise.

---

Okay.

---

No, I read too many state statutes.  The kid was disobeying a lawful order to stay inside for a curfew, and he was too young to legally carry a rifle. those two facts reduce the level of self-defense that Wisconsin law permits him to exercise.

---

Okay.

Wiki-lawyer is best lawyer.

---

The left will condemn a 17 year old as a white supremacist who was defending himself...

but when a man wearing a hat is murdered for no reason except for what he was wearing? Crickets. The left on this board are just as evil as the left at large.

I don't know if he was a white supremacist, but, per Wisconsin law, he was obligated to retreat and to use the least lethal means available to him if he wants to claim self-defense.  Should have used the butt end of his rifle if he didn't want to be on trial for murder.

He was running away. They tackled him and were beating him with fists and a skateboard with a third guy pulling a gun. Only a moron would suggest a rifle butt in that situation, so I guess you fulfilled expectations.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Okay.

Wiki-lawyer is best lawyer.

---

I don't know if he was a white supremacist, but, per Wisconsin law, he was obligated to retreat and to use the least lethal means available to him if he wants to claim self-defense.  Should have used the butt end of his rifle if he didn't want to be on trial for murder.

He was running away. They tackled him and were beating him with fists and a skateboard with a third guy pulling a gun. Only a moron would suggest a rifle butt in that situation, so I guess you fulfilled expectations.

That's what I was alluding to but he intentionally ignored it.

---

You watch too many movies.

No, I read too many state statutes.  The kid was disobeying a lawful order to stay inside for a curfew, and he was too young to legally carry a rifle. those two facts reduce the level of self-defense that Wisconsin law permits him to exercise.

---

And he talks about the 17 year old instead of the murder of a man wearing a hat.

That's evil.

I already commented on the poor guy in the hat.  If they figure out who pulled the trigger, I hope they get the death penalty  - unless there's some mitigating circumstance we don't know about at the moment.

As usual you are wrong again.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

No, I read too many state statutes.  The kid was disobeying a lawful order to stay inside for a curfew, and he was too young to legally carry a rifle. those two facts reduce the level of self-defense that Wisconsin law permits him to exercise.

As usual you are wrong again.

Quote the statute.  Show me where I got it wrong.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Ahh, the peaceful, level headed anqueefa at it again. Pure scum.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

---

I don't know if he was a white supremacist, but, per Wisconsin law, he was obligated to retreat and to use the least lethal means available to him if he wants to claim self-defense.  Should have used the butt end of his rifle if he didn't want to be on trial for murder.

He was running away. They tackled him and were beating him with fists and a skateboard with a third guy pulling a gun. Only a moron would suggest a rifle butt in that situation, so I guess you fulfilled expectations.

I'm not suggesting it as a good tactical choice.
The kid made enough poor choices leading up to that that he had no good tactical choices left.

I am saying it was the only choice that would allow him to make a self defense claim in Wisconsin court.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

---

He was running away. They tackled him and were beating him with fists and a skateboard with a third guy pulling a gun. Only a moron would suggest a rifle butt in that situation, so I guess you fulfilled expectations.

I'm not suggesting it as a good tactical choice.
The kid made enough poor choices leading up to that that he had no good tactical choices left.

I am saying it was the only choice that would allow him to make a self defense claim in Wisconsin court.

Lol, suurreeee. Meanwhile his actual attorneys have already done so.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

I'm not suggesting it as a good tactical choice.
The kid made enough poor choices leading up to that that he had no good tactical choices left.

I am saying it was the only choice that would allow him to make a self defense claim in Wisconsin court.

Lol, suurreeee. Meanwhile his actual attorneys have already done so.

And the prosecution agrees with what I'm saying.
We will have to see what the judge says.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Is mikesez JaguarsWoman? There cannot be any other explanation

---

Your beliefs become your thoughts,
Your thoughts become your words,
Your words become your actions,
Your actions become your habits,
Your habits become your values,
Your values become your destiny.