The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
2020 Presidental Election
|
(12-02-2020, 09:30 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:(12-02-2020, 08:59 AM)Sneakers Wrote: I have read his post and can find proclamation of neither guilt, nor innocence. The first sentence opines that political motives may be driving certain investigations. The second predicts Trump's legal response to any charges that may be brought and the eventual settlement structure of said charges. The Kidde Table - Reserved seating for those who question "Because I said so." Nicknames are GREAT! Did you get one? This forum is just a battle of wits.............when he uses nicknames, you know he's out of ammo!
When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(12-01-2020, 10:51 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: Meh, it's nothing more than a bunch of posturing by politically ambitious lawyers who want a piece of orangeman as a trophy. Trump will counter with a team of high dollar attorneys and it will be whittled down to a parking ticket, if anything, about the time Biden leaves office. He needs to drop Guiliani and go back to his Michael Cohen days where he's just pay cash via crooked attorneys to cover up his unlawful dealings. I agree that he will avoid any jailtime so it's probably time for him to make some $$$.
(12-03-2020, 09:02 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: Why was Ivanka deposed yesterday? [font=arial, sans-serif][font=arial, sans-serif][font=arial, sans-serif]https://lmgtfy.app/?q=Ivanka+Trump+deposed[/font][/font][/font]
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (12-03-2020, 09:15 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:So self dealing? Got it.(12-03-2020, 09:02 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: Why was Ivanka deposed yesterday?
(12-03-2020, 09:31 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:(12-03-2020, 09:15 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [font=arial, sans-serif][font=arial, sans-serif][font=arial, sans-serif]https://lmgtfy.app/?q=Ivanka+Trump+deposed[/font][/font][/font]So self dealing? Got it. Apparently you don't. She was deposed, not convicted. (12-03-2020, 09:36 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:Hahaha oooook(12-03-2020, 09:31 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: So self dealing? Got it. Basically ivanka, chairwoman of the inaugural committee, was informed before the inauguration that the initial amount the TRUMP hotel intended to charge the nonprofit inaugural committee $450,000 a day was considered too much. They lowered it to $175k a day which hotel staff said was still too much. Basically self dealing. She owns the hotel and they are using tax dollars to try to jack up the price. The whole presidency is self dealing in my opinion. Every time he goes to his hotel or club, tax payer money is used and he charges the government.
(12-03-2020, 09:43 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:(12-03-2020, 09:36 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: Apparently you don't. She was deposed, not convicted.Hahaha oooook I agree, they should not have done that. It's unseemly. “An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(12-03-2020, 09:43 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:(12-03-2020, 09:36 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: Apparently you don't. She was deposed, not convicted.Hahaha oooook Understood. I got ahead of my skis, there. My bad.
(12-03-2020, 09:43 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:(12-03-2020, 09:36 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: Apparently you don't. She was deposed, not convicted.Hahaha oooook It is quite a change of pace having a president who was wealthy BEFORE he became POTUS versus AFTER. I'm sure if Obama was wealthy enough to own a hotel before his 65 million dollar Netflix deal & 65 million dollar book deal, you would have seen similar shenanigans. (12-03-2020, 10:05 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:This was your takeaway?(12-03-2020, 09:43 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: Hahaha oooook
(12-03-2020, 10:24 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:(12-03-2020, 10:05 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: It is quite a change of pace having a president who was wealthy BEFORE he became POTUS versus AFTER.This was your takeaway? My takeaway is that this kind of thing happens all the time, and having seen first hand in my job where some of our tax dollars go, this doesn't bother me in the least. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
In the grand scheme of things this is a one-off low level event. During the last four years Trump has been scrutinized up and down every time a Trump property was involved in White House travel.
With that being said, does anyone honestly believe this DA would be so driven if a democrat was involved? The amount of money concerned in this suit is a pittance compared to the malfeasance and corruption payoffs that occur on a daily basis with politicians of every stripe in D.C. Ask Hunter, he knows.
As if things can't get any wackier-
Roger Stone says he has absolutely irrefutable evidence that North Korean boats delivered ballots through a Maine harbor. https://www.newsweek.com/roger-stone-say...ud-1551937 Michael Flynn, who just got a pardon, has called on President Trump to declare martial law and have the military run a do-over election. https://news.yahoo.com/freshly-pardoned-...08613.html Yesterday, Rudy Giuliani's "witness" turned the crazy up to 11. https://www.thedailybeast.com/rudy-giuli...ud-hearing
(12-03-2020, 11:11 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: As if things can't get any wackier- This is almost as off-the-rails as the Brett Kavanaugh accusations.
I knew that lady was going to take center stage in the media. She was the only witness that looked like a crazy, conspiracy theorist. Her story (not her claims at the end) was corroborated by two witnesses that saw the same thing. That lady was there working on behalf of dominion. I'm sure no one hear watched the actual hearings. There is legit disenfranchisement taking place in this democrat districts.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(12-03-2020, 11:48 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: I knew that lady was going to take center stage in the media. She was the only witness that looked like a crazy, conspiracy theorist. Her story (not her claims at the end) was corroborated by two witnesses that saw the same thing. That lady was there working on behalf of dominion. I'm sure no one hear watched the actual hearings. There is legit disenfranchisement taking place in this democrat districts. Come on, man. Every time one of these crazy election fraud theories gets completely refuted, another one pops up. How long is this going to go on? I think the problem is, Trump supporters started with a default position that election fraud happened. Then they went searching for evidence. Isn't that backwards? Aren't you supposed to have some evidence and then make the claim? The reason they started with that default position "election fraud happened" was because Trump told them so. He's the first one to make the claim, and he made the claim without any evidence, because he was making the claim before people even started to vote! My default position is "prove it," because the person initiating these claims is the biggest liar in the history of politics.
(12-03-2020, 12:10 PM)The Real Marty Wrote:(12-03-2020, 11:48 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: I knew that lady was going to take center stage in the media. She was the only witness that looked like a crazy, conspiracy theorist. Her story (not her claims at the end) was corroborated by two witnesses that saw the same thing. That lady was there working on behalf of dominion. I'm sure no one hear watched the actual hearings. There is legit disenfranchisement taking place in this democrat districts. Until the Georgia Senate runoff election is my guess. Stirring up the base.
(12-03-2020, 12:16 PM)homebiscuit Wrote:(12-03-2020, 12:10 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: Come on, man. Every time one of these crazy election fraud theories gets completely refuted, another one pops up. How long is this going to go on? Speaking of that, Trump Allies Urge GA Republicans to Boycott Runoff |
Users browsing this thread: |
4 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.