The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
COVID-19
|
08-11-2021, 01:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-11-2021, 01:28 PM by Lucky2Last. Edited 1 time in total.)
Have you looked into the absolute risk reduction of the vaccine? It's not that great for anyone under 65, and probably worse for kids under 18 (we don't have all the data yet).
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (08-11-2021, 01:25 PM)The Real Marty Wrote:(08-11-2021, 01:16 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: You could have pulled this out of my head, because these are the exact thoughts and questions I have. There is nothing illogical about any question or concern you mentioned. This is stuff everyone should be thinking about and the fact that more people aren’t, frankly scares me. And that may be best for you. Shaming/berating people asking legitimate questions with legitimate concerns is counter productive. Silencing people and sites for offering opinions other than the official government mantra goes against the very reason we have the 1st Amendment causing distrust at a level unseen before.
Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired 1995 - 2020
At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
When this all first started coming out we (at least I) were led to believe that if you got it you were going to end up in the hospital on a ventilator. This has simply not been the case for the most part (at least in my circle of family/friends).
I took the vaccine when it was available to me, only because I "saw in the future" where air travel might be restricted. My parents are elderly and live 2/3 of the way across the country. I need to be able to get to them quickly if needed. I also figured that I was shot up with so many different vaccines during my time in the Navy, so I kind of figured... what's one more? I am against any kind of "mask mandate" for a few reasons. First, most masks being used are not really protective unless it's the N95 type. Second, most people don't wear them properly and who knows how they sanitize them? Finally, most people touch their mask frequently without sanitizing their hands properly. I have no actual data to back up my thoughts on masks, but logically I would think that the mask might actually be more apt to spread germs/COVID. I am also against any kind of "vaccine mandate". I believe that it should be a personal choice whether or not to put any kind of medicine into one's body. The discussion should be between a person and their doctor. I am VERY MUCH against any kind of "vaccine passport". A person's medical history is personal and should be private. There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those who don't. (08-11-2021, 02:26 AM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote:(08-10-2021, 02:19 AM)p_rushing Wrote: Lookup the i-mask+ protocol for prevention. All readily available otc except for the ivermectin. Will help with all kinds of sickness. Designed to help you absorb everything as the zinc and vitamin d can have issues getting into your system. I'm looking for something with quercetin but haven't found a gummy version with everything. PCR tests by themselves cannot determine flu or covid. It is a fact, the CDC is recalling them and they admitted it's because they can't determine which one it is. They also don't have covid isolated to setup the PCR test to begin with, they used ....... other corona viruses, i.e. the flu. Since the PCR test at 40 cycles has a 97% false positive rate, because it picks up any corona virus and doesn't care how much there is, everyone will test positive if you continue testing them everyday if they have an illness as the test can't tell the difference and 97% failure rate is high odds to get a positive. You do not test for variants. I'm sorry you think you do but you are not testing for the variants at your hospital. There is no test for the variant other than sending off to labs to do analysis on the DNA and that testing takes weeks. Even the CDC only takes a handful, can't remember the # but I think it is less than 1,000, every week and tests them. Then they create a % for the "variants". Variants also are not isolated, so how do you test for a variant? You cut a snippet of the sequence and compare it, well how many other corona viruses match that sequence? What happens if you switch that snippet off by 1? You have a brand new variant. Why does everyone need the vaccine? If covid was going to kill you, then I definitely wouldn't risk taking a vaccine that may give you a .5-1.5% that actually benefit. The <1.5% is real, its barred in the results but doesn't look as good as 95% (when 93.5% of the people wouldn't have had an issue with covid). If you have survived this long without getting covid, just continue doing what you are doing and don't risk the adverse events from the vaccine. Vitamins and ivermectin certainly have had effects unless you want to ignore the data in India and other countries where they gave it out and all the cases started dropping immediately. Why won't the hospitals try it? If the patient can't breath and is dying why is your hospital not trying everything to save them? Why are they following a protocol where they know they will die around 80% of the time? Vitamins and ivermectin won't kill you unless they give you a lethal dose like they did to skew some of the studies. People are getting sick, there is a virus, but the rest of the discussion and how best to treat patients has been shutdown and government bureaucrats that do not treat patients have been allowed to create the protocols that don't work and/or cause harm to the patients. The people who are willing to try everything to save their patients are shut down and forbidden to actually practice medicine and try to keep their oath to do no harm and help their patients. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
08-11-2021, 04:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-11-2021, 04:42 PM by Ronster. Edited 2 times in total.)
The Doctors are the least likely to get the jab
![]() The percentage of each education group that is somewhat vaccine hesitant. Source: Carnegie Mellon University
"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"
(08-11-2021, 03:11 PM)p_rushing Wrote:(08-11-2021, 02:26 AM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote: PRushing- sorry about the below if it comes across as a personal attack. It’s not meant to be, I am just very frustrated as someone ‘on the front lines’ who constantly deals with the fallout of the information your helping to spread right now. I can’t talk my own father into getting a COVID vaccine despite the fact he would likely die if he got a moderate case cause he believes much of the same things your putting out. Please stop, because once people decide, especially people who think they aren’t high risk but are, that they aren’t getting vaccines and focusing on vitamins they end up with some of the worst outcomes. Not all of them, but it’s really really taxing a patient is saying you made up his COVID while he can’t even breath and starts heading down the toilet. Especially when you know they likely wouldn’t even be in the hospital and certainly not the ICU if they got the vaccine. There you go again, putting out discredited assertions. https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/sciche...-pcr-test/ FTA: Jim McKinney, an FDA spokesman, told us in an email that to date, “the FDA has authorized more than 380 tests and sample collection kits to diagnose COVID-19, many of which are PCR tests. PCR tests are generally considered to be the ‘gold standard’ for COVID-19 diagnosis.” “The FDA has not issued any statement questioning the reliability of PCR test results in general and will continue to consider authorization for validated PCR tests,” he added. You're doing the same with the 40 Cycle nonsense, it's been discredited. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-...-ct-values FTA, the core point: "The pandemic saw a rise in armchair experts, people who had never stepped foot in a laboratory suddenly learning about PCR and thinking, as in true crime dramas, that they had cracked the case wide open." [font=McGillSerif-Regular, MinionPro-Medium, 'Minion Pro Medium', 'Minion Pro', Century, Georgia, serif][b]TL;DR Take-home message:[/b][/font] - Some people claim, wrongly, that the PCR test for the coronavirus is useless because the so-called Ct values are too high and the test is picking up things that are not the coronavirus - The PCR tests for the coronavirus that have been internally validated by public health agencies are actually very reliable [font=McGillSerif-Regular, MinionPro-Medium, 'Minion Pro Medium', 'Minion Pro', Century, Georgia, serif]- Scientists cannot declare any result above a certain Ct value to be unreliable because Ct values are somewhat relative and must be interpreted by taking into account a variety of factors[/font] So really, it's time for you to get a new shtick because your foundational premise is cracked. “An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
(08-11-2021, 04:27 PM)Ronster Wrote: The Doctors are the least likely to get the jab Here's the link to the analysis of that chart. It seems that the hesitant groups are Trumpers basing their concerns on the politics and not the science. Who'da thunk? You also might consider that Medical Doctors (MDs, DOs) fall into the Professional Category, rarely the PhD. https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/news/news-s...tancy.html Of course the very last line is reason enough for you to outright reject the outcomes anyway: "This research was supported by Facebook and a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention research grant." ![]() “An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
08-11-2021, 07:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-11-2021, 07:23 PM by StroudCrowd1. Edited 1 time in total.)
(08-11-2021, 04:27 PM)Ronster Wrote: The Doctors are the least likely to get the jab My mom told me she talked to her orthopedic surgeon yesterday and he wasn't vaccinated or wearing a mask. There is some merit to this.
08-11-2021, 07:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-11-2021, 08:00 PM by Jags. Edited 1 time in total.)
(08-11-2021, 07:22 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:(08-11-2021, 04:27 PM)Ronster Wrote: The Doctors are the least likely to get the jab I have a few clients that are doctors, they all seem to smoke cigars, cigarettes or hookas. Yet mine [BLEEP] at me for my tobacco use. I don’t have a doctor client that doesn’t. So, If nothing else, they’re human. But that is telling with the lack of vaccinations with those with a PHD.
08-11-2021, 08:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-11-2021, 08:03 PM by Lucky2Last. Edited 1 time in total.)
My doctor isn't getting the jab, either.
FSG is correct, though, in that medical doctors are going to predominantly fall in the professional category. Scientists, however, fall into the PhD category, so there's that. Not sure why the grant donor matters. Also think it's being a bit speculative to suggest Trump supporters are politicizing this, especially since their position has remained consistent.
(08-11-2021, 12:05 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote:(08-11-2021, 02:26 AM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote: PRushing- sorry about the below if it comes across as a personal attack. It’s not meant to be, I am just very frustrated as someone ‘on the front lines’ who constantly deals with the fallout of the information your helping to spread right now. I can’t talk my own father into getting a COVID vaccine despite the fact he would likely die if he got a moderate case cause he believes much of the same things your putting out. Please stop, because once people decide, especially people who think they aren’t high risk but are, that they aren’t getting vaccines and focusing on vitamins they end up with some of the worst outcomes. Not all of them, but it’s really really taxing a patient is saying you made up his COVID while he can’t even breath and starts heading down the toilet. Especially when you know they likely wouldn’t even be in the hospital and certainly not the ICU if they got the vaccine. (08-11-2021, 08:02 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: My doctor isn't getting the jab, either. Twas a bit of humour friend. “An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
My bad. Hard to tell sometimes on the good 'ole internet. What's up with quoting my other post, though?
(08-11-2021, 08:18 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: My bad. Hard to tell sometimes on the good 'ole internet. What's up with quoting my other post, though? I dunno, I push the button it does what it does. “An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
(08-11-2021, 07:59 PM)Jags Wrote:(08-11-2021, 07:22 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: My mom told me she talked to her orthopedic surgeon yesterday and he wasn't vaccinated or wearing a mask. There is some merit to this. That's the ole 'do as I say, not as I do'.. I have multiple RN's in my family, including my wife, who's adopted this method over the years lol
08-12-2021, 01:10 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-12-2021, 01:12 AM by HandsomeRob86. Edited 1 time in total.)
(08-11-2021, 04:27 PM)Ronster Wrote: The Doctors are the least likely to get the jabPhysicians i.e. medical doctors are actually one the groups with the highest vaccinations. AMA survey from June showed 96% of physicians were fully vaccinated. https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/pr...t-covid-19 Now I am sure some womens studies and philosophy phD's are refusing the vaccines, but imo they shouldn't be called doctors in the first place, just like Jill Biden. Yes, it's improvement, but it's Blaine Gabbert 2012 level improvement. - Pirkster The Home Hypnotist! Media on the Brain Link! Quote:Peyton must store oxygen in that forehead of his. No way I'd still be alive after all that choking. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
08-12-2021, 06:54 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-12-2021, 06:57 AM by Jamies_fried_chicken.)
(08-11-2021, 03:11 PM)p_rushing Wrote:(08-11-2021, 02:26 AM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote: PRushing- sorry about the below if it comes across as a personal attack. It’s not meant to be, I am just very frustrated as someone ‘on the front lines’ who constantly deals with the fallout of the information your helping to spread right now. I can’t talk my own father into getting a COVID vaccine despite the fact he would likely die if he got a moderate case cause he believes much of the same things your putting out. Please stop, because once people decide, especially people who think they aren’t high risk but are, that they aren’t getting vaccines and focusing on vitamins they end up with some of the worst outcomes. Not all of them, but it’s really really taxing a patient is saying you made up his COVID while he can’t even breath and starts heading down the toilet. Especially when you know they likely wouldn’t even be in the hospital and certainly not the ICU if they got the vaccine. I had a relative go to CVS 6 times to take a covid test. The PCR came back negative all 6 times. On the 7th test she was clearly exhibiting symptoms and the test came bacl negative. She literally on the same day went to the department of health to get tested and it came back positive. Im really questioning the accuracy of these tests. (08-12-2021, 06:54 AM)Jamies_fried_chicken Wrote:(08-11-2021, 03:11 PM)p_rushing Wrote: PCR tests by themselves cannot determine flu or covid. It is a fact, the CDC is recalling them and they admitted it's because they can't determine which one it is. They also don't have covid isolated to setup the PCR test to begin with, they used ....... other corona viruses, i.e. the flu. Since the PCR test at 40 cycles has a 97% false positive rate, because it picks up any corona virus and doesn't care how much there is, everyone will test positive if you continue testing them everyday if they have an illness as the test can't tell the difference and 97% failure rate is high odds to get a positive. (08-12-2021, 06:54 AM)Jamies_fried_chicken Wrote:I had a relative go to CVS 6 times to take a covid test. The PCR came back negative all 6 times. On the 7th test she was clearly exhibiting symptoms and the test came back negative. She literally on the same day went to the department of health to get tested and it came back positive. Im really questioning the accuracy of these tests.(08-11-2021, 03:11 PM)p_rushing Wrote: PCR tests by themselves cannot determine flu or covid. It is a fact, the CDC is recalling them and they admitted it's because they can't determine which one it is. They also don't have covid isolated to setup the PCR test to begin with, they used ....... other corona viruses, i.e. the flu. Since the PCR test at 40 cycles has a 97% false positive rate, because it picks up any corona virus and doesn't care how much there is, everyone will test positive if you continue testing them everyday if they have an illness as the test can't tell the difference and 97% failure rate is high odds to get a positive.
Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.
Looks like boosters are on the way. They'll start with who they should have started with, then move on to the rest of you guys. I love an experiment with no control group... especially one that makes people a crap ton of money.
“New data shows antibodies against Delta wane after 6-8m and breakthrough against Delta is rising,” Yee wrote. “We expect FDA to move to booster approvals.” https://www.barrons.com/articles/booster...1628687318
08-12-2021, 08:28 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-12-2021, 08:43 AM by Lucky2Last. Edited 1 time in total.)
Hopefully, this booster stays limited to the elderly, but we'll see. The vaccine is showing some signs of age dependent immune response. That needs to be watched carefully. This paper suggests the elderly will not actually maintain a sufficient level of antibodies, and will require boosters. That's not how the immune system should work. It also shows this is not the case with younger people, but for how long? How does this compare to people with a natural immune response in both the elderly and the young? Questions we should be answering.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33906236/ Here's another doozy of a study. TLDR: Breakthrough Delta variant infections are associated with high viral loads, prolonged PCR positivity, and low levels of vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies, explaining the transmission between the vaccinated people. Physical distancing measures remain critical to reduce SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant transmission. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?...zqITvHgj20 |
Users browsing this thread: |
5 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.