The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Post Free Agency Mock Draft - First Run
|
Cine would be an excellent choice at 33. As was already noted, Jenkins is likely to be gone after next season and Cine would be a great replacement. Selecting him would be similar to last draft when they took Tyson Campbell at that same spot. They knew Henderson was unlikely to be around for long so decided to be proactive despite there not being an immediate need at corner.
My only hesitancy about taking Cine is that there is likely to be a receiver who falls to 33 who would be impossible to pass on. The best solution, in my opinion, would be to trade for D.K. Metcalf (not my original idea), take the best pass rusher at 9 and then take Cine at 33. Trading for Metcalf is not without risks, but if his foot injuries are not considered a problem he'd be the best possible option at the X receiver spot. My mock would then be: 1(9): Jermaine Johnson/Travon Walker/George Karlaftis- 2(33): Lewis Cine 3(65) Jamaree Salyer/Tyler Smith 3(70): Troy Anderson 4(106) Woods/Dulcich/Likely (best T.E. available) My guess is that Baalke/Pederson will use some of their extra picks to move back up into rounds 2 or 3. That way, if they really love a guy like Salyer they won't have to pray he makes it past round 2. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(03-21-2022, 11:37 AM)jaglou53 Wrote: Cine would be an excellent choice at 33. As was already noted, Jenkins is likely to be gone after next season and Cine would be a great replacement. Selecting him would be similar to last draft when they took Tyson Campbell at that same spot. They knew Henderson was unlikely to be around for long so decided to be proactive despite there not being an immediate need at corner. I honestly cannot imagine a better scenario. (03-21-2022, 02:09 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:(03-21-2022, 11:37 AM)jaglou53 Wrote: Cine would be an excellent choice at 33. As was already noted, Jenkins is likely to be gone after next season and Cine would be a great replacement. Selecting him would be similar to last draft when they took Tyson Campbell at that same spot. They knew Henderson was unlikely to be around for long so decided to be proactive despite there not being an immediate need at corner. Glad we are on the same page on this one. Hopefully Baalke is, too!
I'm glad we're all on the same page with a completely fictional sub .1% proposal!
Now if we could only get on the same page about the realistic stuff...
Cine went to the Eagles at 19 in PFFs live mock this morning. Unfortunately I am seeing him in the 20s more often than not lately. While I am still extremely intruiged by doubling down and taking Mafe at 33 I do not see it as a realistic opsion so I'm probably pivoting back to a small reach for Pickens being the best option.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (03-21-2022, 04:14 PM)Upper Wrote: Cine went to the Eagles at 19 in PFFs live mock this morning. Unfortunately I am seeing him in the 20s more often than not lately. While I am still extremely intruiged by doubling down and taking Mafe at 33 I do not see it as a realistic opsion so I'm probably pivoting back to a small reach for Pickens being the best option.Hutch and Pickens have been the 2 most popular picks for Jags in round 1 and 2. Round 3 has been all over the place. LB in round 3 is kinda popular.
(03-21-2022, 06:41 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:(03-21-2022, 04:14 PM)Upper Wrote: Cine went to the Eagles at 19 in PFFs live mock this morning. Unfortunately I am seeing him in the 20s more often than not lately. While I am still extremely intruiged by doubling down and taking Mafe at 33 I do not see it as a realistic opsion so I'm probably pivoting back to a small reach for Pickens being the best option.Hutch and Pickens have been the 2 most popular picks for Jags in round 1 and 2. We gotta take a TE fairly early. TE's are very prominent in Pederson's offense and Engram is only here on a 1 yer deal and has been dealing with a lot of injuries. I'd be shocked if we went into day 3 of the draft without TE already being addressed.
(03-20-2022, 09:47 AM)Caldrac Wrote: Now that the free agency market has a solid week behind it. Time to start trying to get a feel for what the team might do next month during the draft. After the below additions: I really like this, much effort went in this one! Still we need LB talent/help, where do we find it?
LOVE THEM JAGUARS!
(03-21-2022, 06:41 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:(03-21-2022, 04:14 PM)Upper Wrote: Cine went to the Eagles at 19 in PFFs live mock this morning. Unfortunately I am seeing him in the 20s more often than not lately. While I am still extremely intruiged by doubling down and taking Mafe at 33 I do not see it as a realistic opsion so I'm probably pivoting back to a small reach for Pickens being the best option.Hutch and Pickens have been the 2 most popular picks for Jags in round 1 and 2. I know, I just don't think Pickens is quite in the 33 tier. More like 40s range IMO. I understand we're desperate though and won't be too upset with a reach for him. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (03-21-2022, 07:16 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:They certainly do not have to take a TE early.(03-21-2022, 06:41 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: Hutch and Pickens have been the 2 most popular picks for Jags in round 1 and 2. I’m cool waiting until round 4 or so for a TE (03-21-2022, 07:47 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:(03-21-2022, 07:16 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: We gotta take a TE fairly early. TE's are very prominent in Pederson's offense and Engram is only here on a 1 yer deal and has been dealing with a lot of injuries. I'd be shocked if we went into day 3 of the draft without TE already being addressed.They certainly do not have to take a TE early. I think we don't have to take TE early, but it wouldn't surprise me one bit to see us go TE in the 2nd or 3rd round. I think Pederson takes the position more seriously than any other coach we've had. Had we signed Engram to a longer term deal, I might be inclined to think we go TE in the 3rd or later. Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
(03-21-2022, 07:50 PM)Bullseye Wrote:(03-21-2022, 07:47 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: They certainly do not have to take a TE early. Baalke has definitely proven that he doesn't care blowing out the budget for non premium positions, I certainly won't be surprised if he does it in the draft either. There is no top 50 TE in this class, but TE at 33 should surprise no one. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
03-21-2022, 07:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2022, 08:03 PM by Bullseye. Edited 1 time in total.)
(03-21-2022, 07:53 PM)Dimson Wrote: Don't think I've ever heard of Spiegel. I don't see the blue check mark thing, so either 1. My eyesight is even worse than I thought 2. It's a fake twitter account 3. He's not exactly a public figure. If it's true, that's an excellent development. But if there's anything to this, it wouldn't surprise me to learn this is the Jaguars leaking this information to drum up the trade talk to drive up the price. Edit: Thinking about it, the timing seems to fit a little. The Falcons just traded Matt Ryan to get a 3rd round pick. I think they also have 2 2nd round picks. Maybe... Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
(03-21-2022, 07:57 PM)Bullseye Wrote:(03-21-2022, 07:53 PM)Dimson Wrote: It is sus of course but it is in the realm of possibilities if a QB can rise up the draft board. (03-21-2022, 07:53 PM)Upper Wrote:(03-21-2022, 07:50 PM)Bullseye Wrote: I think we don't have to take TE early, but it wouldn't surprise me one bit to see us go TE in the 2nd or 3rd round. It wouldn't necessarily be at 33. They could trade back from 33, or up from the 3rd round into the bottom half of the 2nd round. Considering the needs of the offense, as well as the need to give TL weapons, it may well be a priority/premium position for Pederson. Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(03-21-2022, 08:06 PM)Bullseye Wrote:(03-21-2022, 07:53 PM)Upper Wrote: Baalke has definitely proven that he doesn't care blowing out the budget for non premium positions, I certainly won't be surprised if he does it in the draft either. There is no top 50 TE in this class, but TE at 33 should surprise no one. Agree 100%. Personally, I believe we use one of our 3rd round picks on a TE. (03-21-2022, 08:58 PM)Upper Wrote: 65 or 70 is fine. 33 is not. Question: If I recall correctly (and please correct me if I don't) you were strongly against Friermuth at the bottom of the first and in the 2nd last year. Do you just not like TEs taken higher than the 3rd? Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.