Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Jags working on Cam Robinson deal *DEAL REACHED*

#1

In my mind this puts any OT out of the question.   If they are working on signing Cam they are not drafting a RT at 1 overall.   I guess they see potential but in Cam's defense I believe he only allowed 1 sack all of last year.

https://www.si.com/nfl/jaguars/news/tren...reddit.com
[Image: mvp.avia8a99974486b2b89.md.png]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


Reply

#3

(04-24-2022, 08:09 PM)jaguarmvp Wrote: In my mind this puts any OT out of the question.   If they are working on signing Cam they are not drafting a RT at 1 overall.   I guess they see potential but in Cam's defense I believe he only allowed 1 sack all of last year.

https://www.si.com/nfl/jaguars/news/tren...reddit.com

maybe not "any OT". But it should put the kibosh on taking one early. I think we can look at a day 3 pick just to add some Josh Wells-type depth. Not someone you want to hang a season's hopes on, but good enough to step in and give you some decent reps if your starter turns an ankle or something inevitable like that.
Reply

#4

(04-25-2022, 08:48 AM)Mikey Wrote:
(04-24-2022, 08:09 PM)jaguarmvp Wrote: In my mind this puts any OT out of the question.   If they are working on signing Cam they are not drafting a RT at 1 overall.   I guess they see potential but in Cam's defense I believe he only allowed 1 sack all of last year.

https://www.si.com/nfl/jaguars/news/tren...reddit.com

maybe not "any OT". But it should put the kibosh on taking one early. I think we can look at a day 3 pick just to add some Josh Wells-type depth. Not someone you want to hang a season's hopes on, but good enough to step in and give you some decent reps if your starter turns an ankle or something inevitable like that.

I have peaked at some of your post and at times you have to intelligent football stuff to say. From what it's worth welcome off the ignore list.

I agree depth never hurts. In the fourth round or later we have to look at and player as depth. Sure stars come out of later rounds but it's more rare.

I'm a fan of taking all of our picks and using them to move up.
[Image: mvp.avia8a99974486b2b89.md.png]
Reply

#5
(This post was last modified: 04-25-2022, 12:52 PM by RicoTx. Edited 1 time in total.)

I'll bet Mikey is ecstatic...
[Image: IMG-1452.jpg]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

(04-25-2022, 12:46 PM)jaguarmvp Wrote:
(04-25-2022, 08:48 AM)Mikey Wrote: maybe not "any OT". But it should put the kibosh on taking one early. I think we can look at a day 3 pick just to add some Josh Wells-type depth. Not someone you want to hang a season's hopes on, but good enough to step in and give you some decent reps if your starter turns an ankle or something inevitable like that.

I have peaked at some of your post and at times you have to intelligent football stuff to say. From what it's worth welcome off the ignore list.

I agree depth never hurts. In the fourth round or later we have to look at and player as depth. Sure stars come out of later rounds but it's more rare.

I'm a fan of taking all of our picks and using them to move up.

I appreciate the complement. I'll agree that while Trevor is on his rookie deal, the urgency is there, we should be considering all our picks as ammo to move up for guys we think will get us back to winning. I just hope they don't use all the picks at once to move up Wink
Reply

#7

(04-25-2022, 12:46 PM)jaguarmvp Wrote:
(04-25-2022, 08:48 AM)Mikey Wrote: maybe not "any OT". But it should put the kibosh on taking one early. I think we can look at a day 3 pick just to add some Josh Wells-type depth. Not someone you want to hang a season's hopes on, but good enough to step in and give you some decent reps if your starter turns an ankle or something inevitable like that.

I have peaked at some of your post and at times you have to intelligent football stuff to say. From what it's worth welcome off the ignore list.

I agree depth never hurts. In the fourth round or later we have to look at and player as depth. Sure stars come out of later rounds but it's more rare.

I'm a fan of taking all of our picks and using them to move up.

Overlooking the fact that the bolded sentence doesn't make sense from a grammatical standpoint, I don't see this as a compliment.  Translated: at times, you have intelligent things to say but most of the times you don't.
Reply

#8

(04-25-2022, 04:40 PM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote:
(04-25-2022, 12:46 PM)jaguarmvp Wrote: I have peaked at some of your post and at times you have to intelligent football stuff to say. From what it's worth welcome off the ignore list.

I agree depth never hurts. In the fourth round or later we have to look at and player as depth. Sure stars come out of later rounds but it's more rare.

I'm a fan of taking all of our picks and using them to move up.

Overlooking the fact that the bolded sentence doesn't make sense from a grammatical standpoint, I don't see this as a compliment.  Translated: at times, you have intelligent things to say but most of the times you don't.

It was a backhanded complement, but I was extending the olive branch.

And really, look at my post history, he ain't wrong about most of the times
Reply

#9

https://twitter.com/rapsheet/status/1519...ELHTPDwpLQ

Done.

Frees up cap space too
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

I hope the deal has an out or it's not so huge he couldn't play RT at some point.

Not in love with settling for him as a solution at LT long term.

This is probably more about cap space and insurance than long term confidence in the player, but who knows where this staff and FO land on Cam?
Reply

#11

Giving 18M a year to your 2nd best LT is brilliant. Great job Trent.

/s
Reply

#12

(04-27-2022, 10:23 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: https://twitter.com/rapsheet/status/1519...ELHTPDwpLQ

Done.

Frees up cap space too

I bet the Vegas odds on us drafting Ickey just went down. Looks like it's gonna be an edge rusher or something out of left field.
Reply

#13

3 years - 54 mil possible - team out clause after two yrs
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

great move

Reply

#15

(04-27-2022, 10:39 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:
(04-27-2022, 10:23 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: https://twitter.com/rapsheet/status/1519...ELHTPDwpLQ

Done.

Frees up cap space too

I bet the Vegas odds on us drafting Ickey just went down. Looks like it's gonna be an edge rusher or something out of left field.

I'm so tired of going by the numbers. Some arbitrary draft value board invented in the 90s.

The Jags should draft the player that in 5 years will be considered the best player out of the draft. Position shouldn't even factor into it.

It's Sauce. 100% it's Sauce. He is going to be a perennial all-pro. Lets just get the best player. Please.
Reply

#16

So that's that. I do wonder who will play left guard and right tackle this season.
Reply

#17
(This post was last modified: 04-27-2022, 11:04 AM by JagsFanClubOfMD. Edited 1 time in total.)

(04-27-2022, 11:00 AM)Jag88 Wrote: So that's that. I do wonder who will play left guard and right tackle this season.

Ben Bartch and a draft pick will compete at LG and Little and Taylor will complete at RT is my guess.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

Really curious of guaranteed amount
Reply

#19

Good. Let this be the end of any talk about taking an OT with the first pick. Just take Hutch and stop thinking about it. Or trade down if you can get a phenomenal deal . . . which doesn't sound likely.
[Image: badbaalke.jpg]
Reply

#20

(04-27-2022, 10:40 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: 3 years - 54 mil possible - team out clause after two yrs

Good.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!