Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Canada Joins the Netherlands in Operation Eat Bugs

#1

The globalist have some very nasty plans for all of us…The elites are working hard to destroy western civilization. Enjoy-

You will switch to bugs, and you will like it.  After using government incentives and subsidies to build a new facility in London, Ontario, to manufacturer 9,000 metric tons of crickets for human consumption to replace cows, pigs and chickens, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau now triggers a series of nitrogen emission reduction regulations to target traditional farming.

Much more - read the comments as well..


https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blo...emissions/
"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2
(This post was last modified: 07-24-2022, 07:07 PM by mikesez. Edited 1 time in total.)

Cricket protein is not terrible, I've had shakes and bars with it. It can replace whey protein. But, two downsides. One, it's quite a bit more expensive at the moment. If something is using less of the earth's resources, less water, less land, less plants, it should cost less to the consumer. The other downside is the allergen statement. It's not an ingredient you'll ever be able to sneak in, and a lot of people are allergic to shellfish.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#3

(07-24-2022, 07:06 PM)mikesez Wrote: Cricket protein is not terrible, I've had shakes and bars with it.  It can replace whey protein.  But, two downsides.  One, it's quite a bit more expensive at the moment.  If something is using less of the earth's resources, less water, less land, less plants, it should cost less to the consumer.  The other downside is the allergen statement.  It's not an ingredient you'll ever be able to sneak in, and a lot of people are allergic to shellfish.

I just knew the local communist would applaud this. A true government schill. 

You can always tell the ones that didn’t bother to read the article
"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"
Reply

#4

Thank God I know how to hunt and fish.......... ANd grow my own veggies........ I was operating a John Deere before I learned to drive a car.......
Wants to join the "cereal box" dating service. I've dated enough flakes and nuts...all I want is the prize now.
[Image: mds111.jpg]
Reply

#5

(07-24-2022, 07:16 PM)Ronster Wrote:
(07-24-2022, 07:06 PM)mikesez Wrote: Cricket protein is not terrible, I've had shakes and bars with it.  It can replace whey protein.  But, two downsides.  One, it's quite a bit more expensive at the moment.  If something is using less of the earth's resources, less water, less land, less plants, it should cost less to the consumer.  The other downside is the allergen statement.  It's not an ingredient you'll ever be able to sneak in, and a lot of people are allergic to shellfish.

I just knew the local communist would applaud this. A true government schill. 

You can always tell the ones that didn’t bother to read the article

You call that applauding?
But yes, I didn't read the article.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6
(This post was last modified: 07-25-2022, 10:25 AM by NewJagsCity. Edited 1 time in total.)

The article was primarily about Trudeau forcing farmers to reduce fertilizer emissions, not eating bugs. That being said, this bugs-as-food thing has been around since at least the late 60's. Anyone else out there remember chocolate covered ants?

Seems like the only bug that would really provide any 'meat' would be a locust or cicadia, and I wouldn't eat either. Too gooey.

And Trudeau is a dick. One of the worst PM's in Canada's history. And they are stuck with him till 2025 and maybe beyond. O Canada, indeed.
"Remember Red, Hope is a good thing. Maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies."  - Andy Dufresne, The Shawshank Redemption
Reply

#7
(This post was last modified: 07-25-2022, 11:45 AM by mikesez. Edited 1 time in total.)

(07-25-2022, 10:20 AM)NewJagsCity Wrote: The article was primarily about Trudeau forcing farmers to reduce fertilizer emissions, not eating bugs.  That being said, this bugs-as-food thing has been around since at least the late 60's.  Anyone else out there remember chocolate covered ants?

Seems like the only bug that would really provide any 'meat' would be a locust or cicadia, and I wouldn't eat either.  Too gooey.

And Trudeau is a dick.  One of the worst PM's in Canada's history.  And they are stuck with him till 2025 and maybe beyond.  O Canada, indeed.

 Overuse of fertilizer disrupts disrupts the environment in multiple ways, but when droughts are causing the flow of water to many farms to be reduced, it is not the time to cut back on fertilizer, in the areas that still recieve plenty of water like Canada.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#8

(07-25-2022, 11:44 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(07-25-2022, 10:20 AM)NewJagsCity Wrote: The article was primarily about Trudeau forcing farmers to reduce fertilizer emissions, not eating bugs.  That being said, this bugs-as-food thing has been around since at least the late 60's.  Anyone else out there remember chocolate covered ants?

Seems like the only bug that would really provide any 'meat' would be a locust or cicadia, and I wouldn't eat either.  Too gooey.

And Trudeau is a dick.  One of the worst PM's in Canada's history.  And they are stuck with him till 2025 and maybe beyond.  O Canada, indeed.

 Overuse of fertilizer disrupts disrupts the environment in multiple ways, but when droughts are causing the flow of water to many farms to be reduced, it is not the time to cut back on fertilizer, in the areas that still recieve plenty of water like Canada.

sigh..

[Image: tfi_2021_sustainabilitygraphics_v5_kb-04.jpg]
"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"
Reply

#9

(07-25-2022, 12:14 PM)Ronster Wrote:
(07-25-2022, 11:44 AM)mikesez Wrote:  Overuse of fertilizer disrupts disrupts the environment in multiple ways, but when droughts are causing the flow of water to many farms to be reduced, it is not the time to cut back on fertilizer, in the areas that still recieve plenty of water like Canada.

sigh..

[Image: tfi_2021_sustainabilitygraphics_v5_kb-04.jpg]

What is that graph supposed to be showing us?
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

(07-25-2022, 12:29 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(07-25-2022, 12:14 PM)Ronster Wrote: sigh..

[Image: tfi_2021_sustainabilitygraphics_v5_kb-04.jpg]

What is that graph supposed to be showing us?

https://www.tfi.org/sustainability
"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"
Reply

#11

The real question is

Will the crickets improve 5G coverage?
R.I.P. Stroudcrowd1
Reply

#12

(07-25-2022, 01:03 PM)Ronster Wrote:
(07-25-2022, 12:29 PM)mikesez Wrote: What is that graph supposed to be showing us?

https://www.tfi.org/sustainability

Ah.
Trudeau and Rutte aren't concerned about how much CO2 is emitted while fertilizer is produced.
They are concerned about dead zones and other disruptions in the marine environment as fertilizer runs downstream.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#13

(07-25-2022, 06:24 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(07-25-2022, 01:03 PM)Ronster Wrote: https://www.tfi.org/sustainability

Ah.
Trudeau and Rutte aren't concerned about how much CO2 is emitted while fertilizer is produced.
They are concerned about dead zones and other disruptions in the marine environment as fertilizer runs downstream.

Ya, that’s what their worried about, lol
"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!





Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!