Wait, wait, wait.

CBS and the NYT said so? Well, damn...I'm convinced.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Wait, wait, wait.

CBS and the NYT said so?  Well, damn...I'm convinced.

Wait, wait, wait - 
you conveniently just dismiss facts that throw your narrative in the gutter? 

Well, damn... I'm shocked.

---

I dismiss propaganda from the DNC House Organs.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

The bolded above is the only true thing in your post. Everything else is manufactured gobbledygook.

So shocked that you want to cling to lies and conspiracy instead of dead [BLEEP], black and white truth staring you in your gullible face. 

They have the phone records proving he was questioned and you just continue to lie about it like a little [BLEEP] instead of accepting the simple and basic truth of the situation

Just like 90% of your house of cards garbage in this forum. You prop up empty propaganda rather than face reality.

Eh, believe what you want. You're super smart.

---

It was a big event involving many people.  Compare it to any other mass event.  Did every guy who rioted in DC the night of April 4 1968 know each other? No, but you can say they did the same things and participated in the same event.

Participation is not incitement.  I'm really getting tired of explaining to you the definitions of the words you choose and misuse.  If you're uncertain of their relative definitions, perhaps you could first consult a dictionary?

They're not mutually exclusive.  You can participate in inciting something along with someone else who is also inciting it. You need to stop playing gotcha and listen for a while.

---

LOL indeed 

Someone making that list and being removed from it after questioning is not grounds for some horse [BLEEP] conspiracy 

It simply is what it is

You are just continuing to spread baseless lies. 

I'm using about .001% of my normal brain to illustrate how gullible and stubborn you are being about something that has zero merit to have been blown into this [BLEEP] storm of conspiracy garbage. 

Read and learn. 


CBS - News 


NYT

It was a noting burger from the start - just one more desperate attempt at propaganda by the infotainment set.

He's an idiot that instigated bad behavior and he's now charged for it.

the end.

The bolded above is the only true thing in your post. Everything else is manufactured gobbledygook.

You were caught moving the goalposts and now you're squealing about it.

Do you still suspect that Ray Epps is some sort of plant or narc?

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Absolutely. I am moving the goal posts in the sense that I didn't think he was questioned, but it doesn't matter. That's just my bad memory. It doesn't change anything about this being sus. You don't do what he did and just have the government ignore it. Everyone else around him is getting ridiculous sentences for lesser crimes. The phone call is irrelevant, imo. If you want to hang your hat on that, go ahead... you're still not thinking.

---

Absolutely. I am moving the goal posts in the sense that I didn't think he was questioned, but it doesn't matter. That's just my bad memory. It doesn't change anything about this being sus. You don't do what he did and just have the government ignore it. Everyone else around him is getting ridiculous sentences for lesser crimes. The phone call is irrelevant, imo. If you want to hang your hat on that, go ahead... you're still not thinking.

Not sure I've seen a grown man over the age of 40 use the word "sus".....

---

Absolutely. I am moving the goal posts in the sense that I didn't think he was questioned, but it doesn't matter. That's just my bad memory. It doesn't change anything about this being sus. You don't do what he did and just have the government ignore it. Everyone else around him is getting ridiculous sentences for lesser crimes. The phone call is irrelevant, imo. If you want to hang your hat on that, go ahead... you're still not thinking.

Not sure I've seen a grown man over the age of 40 use the word "sus".....

Agism aside -

It's the "you're still not thinking" part that actually means something completely different to the paranoid mind than the rational person. 

He really means "you still don't suffer the same paranoid delusions that torture me."

---

Has nothing to do with paranoid vs rational. It's about how you reason. It's not "rational" to believe everything you're told. In fact, there are many instances where believing what you are told is irrational. I believe this is one of those instances, but I can respect why others might question my point of view. What I don't respect is absolute certainty that one is right when they have no way of corroborating that information. You have no epistemic humility. Inductive reasoning is how almost all progress is made.

---

Has nothing to do with paranoid vs rational. It's about how you reason. It's not "rational" to believe everything you're told. In fact, there are many instances where believing what you are told is irrational. I believe this is one of those instances, but I can respect why others might question my point of view. What I don't respect is absolute certainty that one is right when they have no way of corroborating that information. You have no epistemic humility. Inductive reasoning is how almost all progress is made.

Yes, that's what I'm doing, LOL. If I believed everything I'm told on Ray Epps, I'd believe 107 different theories about his involvement and affiliations. I don't.  Because I culled through all that stuff to find the only reasonable conclusion supported by actual [BLEEP] evidence, while you cling to interpretations from a bunch of tinfoil hat wearing nut jobs blathering on some crackpot YouTube channel. 

But, big kudos on finding an eloquent way to explain your paranoia. That was cute. 

Big, big difference between applying inductive reasoning and buying a bunch of conspiratorial horse [BLEEP] because you keep overlooking all of the holes in these crackpot theories. Holes that you are clearly smart enough to know refute the principle theory. But it would appear you adopt a "suspension of disbelief" when you enter the rabbit hole on these things. That's is not inductive reasoning. 

Inductive reasoning has also led a ton of people to failure and demise when they completely bungled assumptions about correlation and causation, which is exactly what you've done with Ray Epps. 

I know it drives you crazy that you can't make me see that I'm acting too smart for my britches - you've harped on it incessantly with all those little snide remarks. And - you know what?  I am a cocky prick. Get over it. 
Whatever your insecurity may be that makes you fixate on the lack of humility/cockiness in my stances dissenting your opinions - that [BLEEP] is on you. 
Not me.

Don't try to put it on me that your garbage interpretation of events is so riddled with flaws I can confidently be an arrogant prick when pointing out how stupid it is.

---

You're the Bill Maher of this message board. Smart enough to be smug when you think the evidence is in your favor, but clueless to the reality around you. You say you "culled through this stuff." Lol, what a joke. Like I said, no epistemic humility.

I'm sure you were all about the Iraq War, huh.

---