Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Hunter Biden Guilty

#41

Looks about right to me..

https://twitter.com/ericmmatheny/status/...qv_QQ&s=19
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#42

[Image: SYVBv.jpg]
Reply

#43

(06-11-2024, 07:59 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(06-11-2024, 07:45 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Has a sittimg president ever had a convicted felon as a son or is this the first time?

Pretty sure it's the first time.
His other son served honorably in the army though, I feel like that should be mentioned along side.

What does that have to do with anything? We are talking about the guy who banged the widow of the guy you are talking about.
Reply

#44

(06-12-2024, 08:09 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:
(06-11-2024, 07:59 PM)mikesez Wrote: Pretty sure it's the first time.
His other son served honorably in the army though, I feel like that should be mentioned along side.

What does that have to do with anything? We are talking about the guy who banged the widow of the guy you are talking about.

The only reason we are talking about any of them is because you are trying to use them to pass judgement against the President of the United States. I'm actually helping you stay on topic.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#45

(06-12-2024, 08:09 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:
(06-11-2024, 07:59 PM)mikesez Wrote: Pretty sure it's the first time.
His other son served honorably in the army though, I feel like that should be mentioned along side.

What does that have to do with anything? We are talking about the guy who banged the widow of the guy you are talking about.

I don't think there's anything necessarily wrong with that. Shared common grief puts people together in odd ways. My own grandparents were that way. Grandma's first husband and Grandpa were best friends growing up and were both in the Florida National Guard and then 30th Infantry together. Husband, my uncle's father, got killed in France and my granddad married her and adopted him 2 years later. Stuff like that happens and it's not something that we should look down on. By all accounts there was nothing between them while Beau was alive, it was all after his death.

Now, Hunter getting her into smoking crack? That's the [BLEEP] we should be pissed about, [BLEEP] junkie.

(06-12-2024, 08:32 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(06-12-2024, 08:09 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: What does that have to do with anything? We are talking about the guy who banged the widow of the guy you are talking about.

The only reason we are talking about any of them is because you are trying to use them to pass judgement against the President of the United States. I'm actually helping you stay on topic.

The only reason is because we know this junkie felon was the connection point between foreign corporations, money laundering, and the corruption in the office of the Vice President and now President.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#46

(06-11-2024, 07:39 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:
(06-11-2024, 06:58 PM)MarleyJag Wrote: It’s weird that the second amendment absolutists are ok with even requiring a form like that to purchase a handgun. I’d expect them to be up in arms about a violation of Hunter Biden’s civil rights. ;-)

We like laws.

Good one!
I'm condescending. That means I talk down to you. 
Check out the Jag's Forum Alternative: Duval Football Fans.
Reply

#47

(06-11-2024, 07:39 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:
(06-11-2024, 06:58 PM)MarleyJag Wrote: It’s weird that the second amendment absolutists are ok with even requiring a form like that to purchase a handgun. I’d expect them to be up in arms about a violation of Hunter Biden’s civil rights. ;-)

We like laws.

I think you're pretty selective about whom the laws apply to.
Reply

#48

I think I've turned into an 'Eye for an Eye' type of person. I used to be one of those turn the other cheek republicans.

Not no more, Jack!!
Reply

#49

(06-11-2024, 06:58 PM)MarleyJag Wrote: It’s weird that the second amendment absolutists are ok with even requiring a form like that to purchase a handgun. I’d expect them to be up in arms about a violation of Hunter Biden’s civil rights. ;-)

I'm not crazy about some of the laws and the paperwork involved with purchasing firearms or accessories.  That particular form is really no big deal.  It's simply a screening form also used for the background check.  Hunter's civil rights were in no way violated at all, especially when it clearly says on the paperwork that lying is a felony under federal law.

You should see the paperwork/hoops involved in order to buy a suppressor.  Talk about unnecessary paperwork and fees.


There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#50

(06-12-2024, 12:58 PM)jagibelieve Wrote:
(06-11-2024, 06:58 PM)MarleyJag Wrote: It’s weird that the second amendment absolutists are ok with even requiring a form like that to purchase a handgun. I’d expect them to be up in arms about a violation of Hunter Biden’s civil rights. ;-)

I'm not crazy about some of the laws and the paperwork involved with purchasing firearms or accessories.  That particular form is really no big deal.  It's simply a screening form also used for the background check.  Hunter's civil rights were in no way violated at all, especially when it clearly says on the paperwork that lying is a felony under federal law.

You should see the paperwork/hoops involved in order to buy a suppressor.  Talk about unnecessary paperwork and fees.

I hear you and I don't disagree but the second amendment taken to it's extreme interpretation means he shouldn't have to submit to a background check at all since buying/owning a gun is a civil right. That's where I would have expected sentiment to go had it been someone else in court.
I'm condescending. That means I talk down to you. 
Check out the Jag's Forum Alternative: Duval Football Fans.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!