Sorry... not buying the Hunter conviction. It's just there to soften the blow for the majority. Nothing will come of it. I reserve the right to be proven wrong.

How would you have felt if they had acquitted him?

---

Gosh no, you are not the definition, but rather the example of hubris and several other things like "eristic", "unserious", "vapid", "argumentative", and "disingenuous."

Must every political argument devolve into personal insults?

This has nothing to do with politics really.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

You use me as a reference to define words? You think way more of me than I do, brother.

Gosh no, you are not the definition, but rather the example of hubris and several other things like "eristic", "unserious", "vapid", "argumentative", and "disingenuous."

The 1st and 4th words are roughly the opposite of the 2nd and 3rd.  
I am argumentative, precisely because I take the things others say on here too seriously.  If I took them all as dumb attempts at humor, I wouldn't reply at all to most of it.
An "unserious" or "vapid" person would not do any of these things.
A disingenuous person would do some of the things I do, but only to try to obtain a tangible benefit like a job or a vote.  I'm not trying to get anything and you know that.
The word you're looking for is "unpersuasive".

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Gosh no, you are not the definition, but rather the example of hubris and several other things like "eristic", "unserious", "vapid", "argumentative", and "disingenuous."

The 1st and 4th words are roughly the opposite of the 2nd and 3rd.  
I am argumentative, precisely because I take the things others say on here too seriously.  If I took them all as dumb attempts at humor, I wouldn't reply at all to most of it.
An "unserious" or "vapid" person would not do any of these things.
A disingenuous person would do some of the things I do, but only to try to obtain a tangible benefit like a job or a vote.  I'm not trying to get anything and you know that.
The word you're looking for is "unpersuasive".

No, my word choices were perfect.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

The 1st and 4th words are roughly the opposite of the 2nd and 3rd.  
I am argumentative, precisely because I take the things others say on here too seriously.  If I took them all as dumb attempts at humor, I wouldn't reply at all to most of it.
An "unserious" or "vapid" person would not do any of these things.
A disingenuous person would do some of the things I do, but only to try to obtain a tangible benefit like a job or a vote.  I'm not trying to get anything and you know that.
The word you're looking for is "unpersuasive".

No, my word choices were perfect.

Once again, you can not be persuaded because you did not come here to learn.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

No, my word choices were perfect.

Once again, you can not be persuaded because you did not come here to learn.

And once again you prove my word choices correct.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

No, my word choices were perfect.

Once again, you can not be persuaded because you did not come here to learn.

Your narcissist view that anyone would actually want to learn anything from you is laughable.  I'd literally do the George Constanza opposite with your advice

---

When arguments devolve into insults, it means you've lost the argument.

---

When arguments devolve into insults, it means you've lost the argument.

Not at all.. Some of us just like to insult people whether we're right or wrong.

---

As for me....... I just have a thing about getting into a battle of wits with an unarmed man...... Just doesn't seem right or worth my time..........

---

Once again, you can not be persuaded because you did not come here to learn.

Your narcissist view that anyone would actually want to learn anything from you is laughable.  I'd literally do the George Constanza opposite with your advice

When have I ever given you advice? "Learn" doesn't mean "build your life around." "Learn" means "learn".  You can go learn about the latest updates to Ford trucks, doesn't mean you're going to buy one.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

When arguments devolve into insults, it means you've lost the argument.

All because they don't want to admit that Jan 6 was real.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

When arguments devolve into insults, it means you've lost the argument.

All because they don't want to admit that Jan 6 was real.

Real? Yes..

Insurrection? No..

A set up? Very possible with the new video evidence starring Pelosi and her daughter.

---

All because they don't want to admit that Jan 6 was real.

Real? Yes..

Insurrection? No..

A set up? Very possible with the new video evidence starring Pelosi and her daughter.

Back to the question I asked Caldrac, if I see a naked beautiful woman walking down the street, and I decide to grope her against her will, can I say, "I'm innocent! She set me up!"

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Marty, how do you respond to that question without insults?

---

Gosh no, you are not the definition, but rather the example of hubris and several other things like "eristic", "unserious", "vapid", "argumentative", and "disingenuous."

The 1st and 4th words are roughly the opposite of the 2nd and 3rd.  
I am argumentative, precisely because I take the things others say on here too seriously.  If I took them all as dumb attempts at humor, I wouldn't reply at all to most of it.
An "unserious" or "vapid" person would not do any of these things.
A disingenuous person would do some of the things I do, but only to try to obtain a tangible benefit like a job or a vote.  I'm not trying to get anything and you know that.
The word you're looking for is "unpersuasive".

Let me help you out, this has nothing to do with how you see yourself.

---

Sorry... not buying the Hunter conviction. It's just there to soften the blow for the majority. Nothing will come of it. I reserve the right to be proven wrong.

How would you have felt if they had acquitted him?

It wouldn't make a difference to me, either way.

---

Real? Yes..

Insurrection? No..

A set up? Very possible with the new video evidence starring Pelosi and her daughter.

Back to the question I asked Caldrac, if I see a naked beautiful woman walking down the street, and I decide to grope her against her will, can I say, "I'm innocent! She set me up!"

Groping anyone against their will shouldn't land you in prison (unless you groped a child)..Groping an adult should net you some minor jail time and receive some sort of probation, unlike rape, which should send the offender to years behind bars (worse if against a child)

So, are you trying to ask me if groping a complete stranger is equal to what happened on J6? Because aside from a few groups of bad actors and a murder, they seemed to stay within those velvet rope walkways.. Cause ya know, insurrectionists never cross the velvet rope lololol

---

Back to the question I asked Caldrac, if I see a naked beautiful woman walking down the street, and I decide to grope her against her will, can I say, "I'm innocent! She set me up!"

Groping anyone against their will shouldn't land you in prison (unless you groped a child)..Groping an adult should net you some minor jail time and receive some sort of probation, unlike rape, which should send the offender to years behind bars (worse if against a child)

So, are you trying to ask me if groping a complete stranger is equal to what happened on J6? Because aside from a few groups of bad actors and a murder, they seemed to stay within those velvet rope walkways.. Cause ya know, insurrectionists never cross the velvet rope lololol

No, I'm saying, does the fact that she was naked make my actions innocent?

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Groping anyone against their will shouldn't land you in prison (unless you groped a child)..Groping an adult should net you some minor jail time and receive some sort of probation, unlike rape, which should send the offender to years behind bars (worse if against a child)

So, are you trying to ask me if groping a complete stranger is equal to what happened on J6? Because aside from a few groups of bad actors and a murder, they seemed to stay within those velvet rope walkways.. Cause ya know, insurrectionists never cross the velvet rope lololol

No, I'm saying, does the fact that she was naked make my actions innocent?

First, think you've reading too much Penthouse Forum.

And honestly, depends on the one being groped? Was the person that got groped giving you those subtle signs of wanting to be groped? Did she shake a boob at you? I mean, there's so many variables and variations that can happen to produce different outcomes of innocence..

Wait.. Is this a personal thing? Are you trying to get some kind of free legal advice? Are you in court for something?

Who did you grab? lolololololol

You need help lololol

---

No, I'm saying, does the fact that she was naked make my actions innocent?

First, think you've reading too much Penthouse Forum.

And honestly, depends on the one being groped? Was the person that got groped giving you those subtle signs of wanting to be groped? Did she shake a boob at you? I mean, there's so many variables and variations that can happen to produce different outcomes of innocence..

Wait.. Is this a personal thing? Are you trying to get some kind of free legal advice? Are you in court for something?

Who did you grab? lolololololol

You need help lololol

You're overthinking this.

You think Nancy Pelosi did not bring enough security to the Capitol in the morning and early afternoon of January 6. And you say that makes her to blame for what happened.

I'm comparing a building having insufficient security to a woman having no clothes.

Did Pelosi do anything, besides not bringing in enough security at the beginning, that could count as some sort of "subtle sign" to the "protestors"?

If not, don't you have to assign most of the blame for what happened to the "protestors"?

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

First, think you've reading too much Penthouse Forum.

And honestly, depends on the one being groped? Was the person that got groped giving you those subtle signs of wanting to be groped? Did she shake a boob at you? I mean, there's so many variables and variations that can happen to produce different outcomes of innocence..

Wait.. Is this a personal thing? Are you trying to get some kind of free legal advice? Are you in court for something?

Who did you grab? lolololololol

You need help lololol

You're overthinking this.

You think Nancy Pelosi did not bring enough security to the Capitol in the morning and early afternoon of January 6. And you say that makes her to blame for what happened.

I'm comparing a building having insufficient security to a woman having no clothes.

Did Pelosi do anything, besides not bringing in enough security at the beginning, that could count as some sort of "subtle sign" to the "protestors"?

If not, don't you have to assign most of the blame for what happened to the "protestors"?

They should have had a velvet rope set up outside since insurrectionists are so scared of em lolol



I wonder what happens when you take security measures away from a large crowd?

---