As I said, Mike has given us insight into the fevered logic of  the DNC/MSM narrative-building for the next four years if Trump wins.

If you thought the  Russia collusion lie was an exercise in leftist political fanaticism, the next four are going to be off the chain.

Prove me wrong.
I'm right and you know it.
You just don't care because your wrongness feels good to you.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

How in the actual heck does anyone think liberals are for less government?! I'm referencing post #137.

Mike has lost his mind.

---

As I said, Mike has given us insight into the fevered logic of  the DNC/MSM narrative-building for the next four years if Trump wins.

If you thought the  Russia collusion lie was an exercise in leftist political fanaticism, the next four are going to be off the chain.

Prove me wrong.
I'm right and you know it.
You just don't care because your wrongness feels good to you.

How do I prove a fantasy as wrong?

---

Prove me wrong.
I'm right and you know it.
You just don't care because your wrongness feels good to you.

How do I prove a fantasy as wrong?

~ Mikesez

---

Sadly, there is little hope for people like Mike. They have the "vote blue no matter who" mentality. Their insane brainwashing overtakes their Judgement.

I see a country that is a complete mess since the Biden Administration has taken over. Who in their right minds could wish for 4 more years of this. The only benefactors are the Uber elites in the top 1% class. The rest of us are grabbing our ankles and getting shafted by Bidenomics.

---

Sadly, there is little hope for people like Mike. They have the "vote blue no matter who" mentality. Their insane brainwashing overtakes their Judgement.

I see a country a complete mess since the Biden Administration has taken over. Who in their right minds could wish for 4 more years of this.  The only benefactors are the Uber elites in the top 1% class.  The rest of us are grabbing our ankles and getting shafted by Bidenomics.

Don't believe you eyes and ears!!

Believe what they tell you to believe!!

---

Of course it wasn't creepy pedo joes fualt

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

Of course it wasn't creepy pedo joes fualt

In their minds they believe that.  I seriously believe their doctor did not get old Joe's brain cocktail mixture right.  Ben Carson was quoted on saying there are mixtures of drugs you can give someone like Joe to "perk them up." If you watch the debate he seemed to get a little sharper as the night went on. Possibly the dose they gave him did not kick in fast enough. They would not volunteer to take a drug test either.  Go watch the debate at the end and watch the very end.  Joe is in such bad shape his wife had to help him down 1 STEP!. Insane anyone would vote for a man in this state.

Ask yourself this:  If you owned a company and was hiring a CEO to take over your company.  Would you hire Joe Biden in his current state to take over your operation?  If you said yes, you are Insane!

---

How in the actual heck does anyone think liberals are for less government?! I'm referencing post #137.

Mike has lost his mind.

Limited.  Not less.  "Less or more" is about what government should or should not involve itself with.  "Limited" is about what government must not involve itself with. 
Classical liberalism is about limited government.

---

Prove me wrong.
I'm right and you know it.
You just don't care because your wrongness feels good to you.

How do I prove a fantasy as wrong?

Here is a list of statements.  Prove any one of them wrong.

He appointed 3 justices. He thought that would be enough for plan A. They didn't help him in 2020 or January 2021. But they're helping him now.

And there is nothing wrong with prosecutors talking to each other. Remember 9/11? We all got together and said that prosecutors and investigators at various levels need to get better at talking to each other.

There is nothing wrong with investigating a campaign for its connections to a foreign adversary if there is reasonable suspicion that those connections exist. There is no evidence that any information not relevant to Russia was actually gleaned, and no evidence that Hillary got any information about Trump as a result of that investigation.

There is nothing wrong with trying to throw Trump in jail if you can prove that Trump actually committed crimes. And in GA they can, it's a slam dunk. The classified documents and federal fraud charges are also air-tight. Do you somehow think Biden should be in jail? For what crime?

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

How in the actual heck does anyone think liberals are for less government?! I'm referencing post #137.

Mike has lost his mind.

Limited.  Not less.  "Less or more" is about what government should or should not involve itself with.  "Limited" is about what government must not involve itself with. 
Classical liberalism is about limited government.

---

How do I prove a fantasy as wrong?

Here is a list of statements.  Prove any one of them wrong.

He appointed 3 justices. He thought that would be enough for plan A. They didn't help him in 2020 or January 2021. But they're helping him now.

And there is nothing wrong with prosecutors talking to each other. Remember 9/11? We all got together and said that prosecutors and investigators at various levels need to get better at talking to each other.

There is nothing wrong with investigating a campaign for its connections to a foreign adversary if there is reasonable suspicion that those connections exist. There is no evidence that any information not relevant to Russia was actually gleaned, and no evidence that Hillary got any information about Trump as a result of that investigation.

There is nothing wrong with trying to throw Trump in jail if you can prove that Trump actually committed crimes. And in GA they can, it's a slam dunk. The classified documents and federal fraud charges are also air-tight. Do you somehow think Biden should be in jail? For what crime?

What's plan A? If there's a plan A, what's plan B, and so on?

---

Limited.  Not less.  "Less or more" is about what government should or should not involve itself with.  "Limited" is about what government must not involve itself with. 
Classical liberalism is about limited government.

---

Here is a list of statements.  Prove any one of them wrong.

What's plan A? If there's a plan A, what's plan B, and so on?

Plan A was to continue in office in 2020 by any necessary means.
Plan B is to stay out of jail, resume in office, and never ever let any non-MAGA candidate win ever again by any necessary means

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

What's plan A? If there's a plan A, what's plan B, and so on?

Plan A was to continue in office in 2020 by any necessary means.
Plan B is to stay out of jail, resume in office, and never ever let any non-MAGA candidate win ever again by any necessary means

See? Fantasy.

---

Plan A was to continue in office in 2020 by any necessary means.
Plan B is to stay out of jail, resume in office, and never ever let any non-MAGA candidate win ever again by any necessary means

See? Fantasy.

Your estimate of Trump's plans and motives is fantasy too, then.
Next.
There is nothing inherently wrong with prosecutors talking to each other if they both have reasonable suspicion about the same person.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

See? Fantasy.

Your estimate of Trump's plans and motives is fantasy too, then.
Next.
There is nothing inherently wrong with prosecutors talking to each other if they both have reasonable suspicion about the same person.

What are my estimates of Trump's plans and motives?

---

Your estimate of Trump's plans and motives is fantasy too, then.
Next.
There is nothing inherently wrong with prosecutors talking to each other if they both have reasonable suspicion about the same person.

What are my estimates of Trump's plans and motives?

They obviously differ from mine, but either way, they are fantasy.  If yours are, so are mine.  Unless you want to offer yours and explain why they are objectively more plausible than mine.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

What are my estimates of Trump's plans and motives?

They obviously differ from mine, but either way, they are fantasy.  If yours are, so are mine.  Unless you want to offer yours and explain why they are objectively more plausible than mine.

None of my expectations involve subverting democracy. Yours do. You've worked yourself up into such a delusional lather that you've reverted to arguments of semantics to convince yourself you are right, or even reasonable. 

Now excuse me while I attend to other business. (speaking in hushed tones to men in black suits) 'Activate plan B. I repeat, activate plan B.'

---

They obviously differ from mine, but either way, they are fantasy.  If yours are, so are mine.  Unless you want to offer yours and explain why they are objectively more plausible than mine.

None of my expectations involve subverting democracy. Yours do. You've worked yourself up into such a delusional lather that you've reverted to arguments of semantics to convince yourself you are right, or even reasonable. 

Now excuse me while I attend to other business. (speaking in hushed tones to men in black suits) 'Activate plan B. I repeat, activate plan B.'

You've worked yourself up into such a smug and self satisfied fetid coprolite that you can't respond to any hypothetical without begging the question.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

None of my expectations involve subverting democracy. Yours do. You've worked yourself up into such a delusional lather that you've reverted to arguments of semantics to convince yourself you are right, or even reasonable. 

Now excuse me while I attend to other business. (speaking in hushed tones to men in black suits) 'Activate plan B. I repeat, activate plan B.'

You've worked yourself up into such a smug and self satisfied fetid coprolite that you can't respond to any hypothetical without begging the question.

You told me, Mike. You told me real good.

---

None of my expectations involve subverting democracy. Yours do. You've worked yourself up into such a delusional lather that you've reverted to arguments of semantics to convince yourself you are right, or even reasonable. 

Now excuse me while I attend to other business. (speaking in hushed tones to men in black suits) 'Activate plan B. I repeat, activate plan B.'

You've worked yourself up into such a smug and self satisfied fetid coprolite that you can't respond to any hypothetical without begging the question.

I had to look up coprolite, and I would just like to point out that a coprolite (fossilized feces) cannot be fetid (smelly).

---

You've worked yourself up into such a smug and self satisfied fetid coprolite that you can't respond to any hypothetical without begging the question.

I had to look up coprolite, and I would just like to point out that a coprolite (fossilized feces) cannot be fetid (smelly).

Fossils definitely stink from time to time, right after they are dug up.  Especially ones like HB.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.