Where's the same empathy for Trump's strategy? If he's not out there feeding your hate three times a week, you make the accusation that he's too old and scared. But if Harris does it, well, that's understandable.

Harris is out there campaigning.  Trump is sitting at home.  I'm just asking.  Why is he not campaigning?  Is it possible that his age is catching up to him?  I'm just asking the question.

What are the facts, Marty?

---

Where's the same empathy for Trump's strategy? If he's not out there feeding your hate three times a week, you make the accusation that he's too old and scared. But if Harris does it, well, that's understandable.

Harris is out there campaigning.  Trump is sitting at home.  I'm just asking.  Why is he not campaigning?  Is it possible that his age is catching up to him?  I'm just asking the question.

Trump gave a 70-minute free-for-all with the press. Harris is nestling herself in campaign echo chambers. Why isn't Harris giving press conferences? I'm just asking the question. 

We can do circular arguments all day.

---

Harris is out there campaigning.  Trump is sitting at home.  I'm just asking.  Why is he not campaigning?  Is it possible that his age is catching up to him?  I'm just asking the question.

Trump gave a 70-minute free-for-all with the press. Harris is nestling herself in campaign echo chambers. Why isn't Harris giving press conferences? I'm just asking the question. 

We can do circular arguments all day.

I have already answered that.

---

Where's the same empathy for Trump's strategy? If he's not out there feeding your hate three times a week, you make the accusation that he's too old and scared. But if Harris does it, well, that's understandable.

Harris is out there campaigning.  Trump is sitting at home.  I'm just asking.  Why is he not campaigning?  Is it possible that his age is catching up to him?  I'm just asking the question.

It looks to me like he has had a fairly active schedule that doesn't include interviews on television and social media.

This is just the last two weeks:

Saturday, July 27, 2024
[SPEECH] Trump Speaks at Bitcoin 2024 Conference in Nashville, Tennesee

[RALLY] President Trump and VP Nominee JD Vance Rally in St. Cloud, Minnesota
When: Saturday, July 27, 2024

[SPEECH] Trump Speaks at National Association of Black Journalists Convention in Chicago, Illinois
When: Wednesday, July 31, 2024

[RALLY] President Trump Holds Rally in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
When: Wednesday, July 31, 2024

[RALLY] President Trump & JD Vance Rally in Atlanta, Georgia
When: Saturday, Aug. 3, 2024

[RALLY] President Trump Holds Rally in Bozeman, Montana
When: Friday, Aug. 9, 2024

During that time he also did several interviews.  What has Kamala's schedule been like since she was appointed (not elected) as the democrat candidate?  How many interviews has she done?

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Trump gave a 70-minute free-for-all with the press. Harris is nestling herself in campaign echo chambers. Why isn't Harris giving press conferences? I'm just asking the question. 

We can do circular arguments all day.

I have already answered that.

You have, but you then apply different logic to Trump.

---

'Trump should talk less.'

Trump talks less.

'What the matter with Trump? Is he old and scared?'

What do you call that dance, Marty, the NYT shuffle?

I'm just asking, why isn't he having rallies like he used to?  He hasn't done anything recently except for that news conference, and one rally in Montana, of all places.  That's not a lot of activity.   Age does catch up with all of us.  He's the oldest candidate in the history of the United States.  Harris and Walz and Vance are all out there campaigning.  Trump is sitting at Mar A Lago.  Doing what?

Why aren't YOU asking the same questions about Kamala Harris?  For you, Trump is the devil.  I get that, but what if the devil you don't know turns out to be worse than the one you do?  Don't you want to at least hear her agenda and know what her presidency will look like?  

With two such diametrically opposed candidates, the outcome of this election is going to have a massive impact on numerous significant aspects of our lives.  Do you want to make an informed choice, or are you so desperate to get away from Trump that you'll run over a cliff to do it?

---

When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.

Harris is out there campaigning.  Trump is sitting at home.  I'm just asking.  Why is he not campaigning?  Is it possible that his age is catching up to him?  I'm just asking the question.

It looks to me like he has had a fairly active schedule that doesn't include interviews on television and social media.

This is just the last two weeks:

Saturday, July 27, 2024
[SPEECH] Trump Speaks at Bitcoin 2024 Conference in Nashville, Tennesee

[RALLY] President Trump and VP Nominee JD Vance Rally in St. Cloud, Minnesota
When: Saturday, July 27, 2024

[SPEECH] Trump Speaks at National Association of Black Journalists Convention in Chicago, Illinois
When: Wednesday, July 31, 2024

[RALLY] President Trump Holds Rally in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
When: Wednesday, July 31, 2024

[RALLY] President Trump & JD Vance Rally in Atlanta, Georgia
When: Saturday, Aug. 3, 2024

[RALLY] President Trump Holds Rally in Bozeman, Montana
When: Friday, Aug. 9, 2024

During that time he also did several interviews.  What has Kamala's schedule been like since she was appointed (not elected) as the democrat candidate?  How many interviews has she done?

This is what I was wanting Marty to do, but he doesn't. He just repeats whatever he reads from a left-wing journalist. Give us Kamala's schedule, Marty.

---

I have already answered that.

You have, but you then apply different logic to Trump.

No I'm not.  Both of them need to be out there campaigning.  I said Harris will do well to just smile and wave and give canned speeches.  Actually, Trump would probably do well to do the same.  The difference between the two is, Trump needs to run on issues, while Harris needs to run on image and likeability.  But both of them need to get out there and campaign.

---

No, dummy. Harris ALSO needs to run on the issues. What's wrong with you, man? Their policies are crushing the lower middle class and driving costs up.

---

No, dummy. Harris ALSO needs to run on the issues. What's wrong with you, man? Their policies are crushing the lower middle class and driving costs up.

You miss my point completely.  I'm saying for Harris to win, she needs to run on image and likeability.  That's her path to winning.  That's what she's actually doing right now, and it's actually working.   Because Trump is so un-likeable.

Trump's advantage is on the issues.  So he needs to run on the issues.  His problem is, he can't seem to focus.  When he does give a speech at a rally, it's 90 minutes of trash talk, which his fans seem to enjoy, but it won't get him beyond his base.  Have you watched those speeches?  He just riffs for 90 minutes with whatever comes into his head.  And half of it is verifiably untrue.  He needs to get a script, and stick to it.  When he lies about going up in a helicopter with Willie Brown, for example, it's just a distraction.

---

And I'm saying WHY DO YOU THINK THAT?

You are so conditioned to think that she doesn't need to run on the issues that you say that should be her campaign strategy. It's [BLEEP] dumb. The voter should ONLY be concerned with what policies the politician will produce, but, because you've gotten used to Democrats controlling the narrative, you give them a pass because it's the right "strategy."

---

And I'm saying WHY DO YOU THINK THAT?

You are so conditioned to think that she doesn't need to run on the issues that you say that should be her campaign strategy. It's [BLEEP] dumb. The voter should ONLY be concerned with what policies the politician will produce, but, because you've gotten used to Democrats controlling the narrative, you give them a pass because it's the right "strategy."

I've explained this over and over.  If she wants to win, read that again, IF SHE WANTS TO WIN, she should run on image and likeability.  

I'm not saying I want her to do that. Read that again.  I'M NOT SAYING I WANT HER TO DO THAT.  I'm saying that is her path to victory.  She has an advantage in that area that she doesn't have on the issues.  

It's how JFK won.  It's how Barack Obama won.  Image.  This is reality.  I'm not saying it ought to be that way, or that that's all we should be concerned about.  I'm saying it's how a lot of politicians win races.  It's not my wish that she should do that.  But it's how she could win.

It's like if I say, "The Texans can beat us if they control the line of scrimmage."  And your response is, "Oh, so you want the Texans to win?"  Don't be obtuse.  You are capable of understand what I am saying.

---

And I'm saying WHY DO YOU THINK THAT?

You are so conditioned to think that she doesn't need to run on the issues that you say that should be her campaign strategy. It's [BLEEP] dumb. The voter should ONLY be concerned with what policies the politician will produce, but, because you've gotten used to Democrats controlling the narrative, you give them a pass because it's the right "strategy."

I've explained this over and over.  If she wants to win, read that again, IF SHE WANTS TO WIN, she should run on image and likeability.  

I'm not saying I want her to do that. Read that again.  I'M NOT SAYING I WANT HER TO DO THAT.  I'm saying that is her path to victory.  She has an advantage in that area that she doesn't have on the issues.  

It's how JFK won.  It's how Barack Obama won.  Image.  This is reality.  I'm not saying it ought to be that way, or that that's all we should be concerned about.  I'm saying it's how a lot of politicians win races.  It's not my wish that she should do that.  But it's how she could win.

It's like if I say, "The Texans can beat us if they control the line of scrimmage."  And your response is, "Oh, so you want the Texans to win?"  Don't be obtuse.  You are capable of understand what I am saying.

No, it's like saying if the Texans want to win, they need to have the best uniforms. The Jaguars strategy should be to score more TDs. It's an asinine scenario. They aren't even playing the same game. It would ONLY make sense in a world where the refs could give the game to the team with the best uniform. 

You moderate Republicans have been conditioned to accept different terms. It should offend you that she only has to run on image and likeability. It should speak volumes to how disparate the standards are for Democrats compared to Republicans. She's not even playing the same game, and you have the audacity to fixate on Trump attacking people who propagate these different standards like it's normal. It's not.

---

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

I've explained this over and over.  If she wants to win, read that again, IF SHE WANTS TO WIN, she should run on image and likeability.  

I'm not saying I want her to do that. Read that again.  I'M NOT SAYING I WANT HER TO DO THAT.  I'm saying that is her path to victory.  She has an advantage in that area that she doesn't have on the issues.  

It's how JFK won.  It's how Barack Obama won.  Image.  This is reality.  I'm not saying it ought to be that way, or that that's all we should be concerned about.  I'm saying it's how a lot of politicians win races.  It's not my wish that she should do that.  But it's how she could win.

It's like if I say, "The Texans can beat us if they control the line of scrimmage."  And your response is, "Oh, so you want the Texans to win?"  Don't be obtuse.  You are capable of understand what I am saying.

No, it's like saying if the Texans want to win, they need to have the best uniforms. The Jaguars strategy should be to score more TDs. It's an asinine scenario. They aren't even playing the same game. It would ONLY make sense in a world where the refs could give the game to the team with the best uniform. 

You moderate Republicans have been conditioned to accept different terms. It should offend you that she only has to run on image and likeability. It should speak volumes to how disparate the standards are for Democrats compared to Republicans. She's not even playing the same game, and you have the audacity to fixate on Trump attacking people who propagate these different standards like it's normal. It's not.

You don't seem to understand.  People vote for different reasons.  AGAIN, I'm not saying this is the way it ought to be, or that I approve of it.  I'm saying this is the way it is.  She is currently winning on image and likeability.  If she can keep that up, she can win the election.  

Again, I am not endorsing this.  I'm saying this is the world we live in.  For example, male candidates these days need to be tall, and good looking, and they need to have a full head of hair.  You think that has anything to do with issues?  It's image.  You say I shouldn't accept it.  Well, I don't have any choice but to accept it, because it's reality.

---

I understand perfectly.

---

Man, if you buy into Marty's theory on how countess kakula has to run her campaign to win you are unequivocally stating that every single person that would vote for her is an utter moron.

Likeness? Smiles? Good God man. Has Americas soft white underbelly grown that large that she even has a chance?

Scary stuff right there folks.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

Man, if you buy into Marty's theory on how countess kakula has to run her campaign to win you are unequivocally stating that every single person that would vote for her is an utter moron.

Likeness? Smiles? Good God man. Has Americas soft white underbelly grown that large that she even has a chance?

Scary stuff right there folks.

Kamala is [BLEEP] stupid and so are the people that vote for her.. She's a fraud and a liar. Everything they claim Trump is.

---

Man, if you buy into Marty's theory on how countess kakula has to run her campaign to win you are unequivocally stating that every single person that would vote for her is an utter moron.

Likeness? Smiles? Good God man. Has Americas soft white underbelly grown that large that she even has a chance?

Scary stuff right there folks.

IMO. If you currently don't already know who you are voting for and a candidate can still sway you at this point, you are a [BLEEP] idiot and a part of the problem.

---

No, it's like saying if the Texans want to win, they need to have the best uniforms. The Jaguars strategy should be to score more TDs. It's an asinine scenario. They aren't even playing the same game. It would ONLY make sense in a world where the refs could give the game to the team with the best uniform. 

You moderate Republicans have been conditioned to accept different terms. It should offend you that she only has to run on image and likeability. It should speak volumes to how disparate the standards are for Democrats compared to Republicans. She's not even playing the same game, and you have the audacity to fixate on Trump attacking people who propagate these different standards like it's normal. It's not.

You don't seem to understand.  People vote for different reasons.  AGAIN, I'm not saying this is the way it ought to be, or that I approve of it.  I'm saying this is the way it is.  She is currently winning on image and likeability.  If she can keep that up, she can win the election.  

Again, I am not endorsing this.  I'm saying this is the world we live in.  For example, male candidates these days need to be tall, and good looking, and they need to have a full head of hair.  You think that has anything to do with issues?  It's image.  You say I shouldn't accept it.  Well, I don't have any choice but to accept it, because it's reality.

You do have a choice, and you choose to accept a candidate whose entire platform is Orange Man Bad.  Instead of bashing Trump at every opportunity, why not add your voice to those of us demanding anything out of Harris.

---

When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.