You don't seem to understand.  People vote for different reasons.  AGAIN, I'm not saying this is the way it ought to be, or that I approve of it.  I'm saying this is the way it is.  She is currently winning on image and likeability.  If she can keep that up, she can win the election.  

Again, I am not endorsing this.  I'm saying this is the world we live in.  For example, male candidates these days need to be tall, and good looking, and they need to have a full head of hair.  You think that has anything to do with issues?  It's image.  You say I shouldn't accept it.  Well, I don't have any choice but to accept it, because it's reality.

You do have a choice, and you choose to accept a candidate whose entire platform is Orange Man Bad.  Instead of bashing Trump at every opportunity, why not add your voice to those of us demanding anything out of Harris.

Is there anything Harris could do to earn your vote?
If not, why should she listen to your "demands"?

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

https://www.instagram.com/wisdomcasts/re...J1Nmc1bTE5

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

---

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."

Man, if you buy into Marty's theory on how countess kakula has to run her campaign to win you are unequivocally stating that every single person that would vote for her is an utter moron.

Likeness? Smiles? Good God man. Has Americas soft white underbelly grown that large that she even has a chance?

Scary stuff right there folks.

You forgot the most important part:
She's not Trump.

Vivek coulda beat Kamala. 
Christie coulda beat her.
Or maybe Ron.

But you had to pick geriatric, narcissistic, Trump.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

You do have a choice, and you choose to accept a candidate whose entire platform is Orange Man Bad.  Instead of bashing Trump at every opportunity, why not add your voice to those of us demanding anything out of Harris.

Is there anything Harris could do to earn your vote?
If not, why should she listen to your "demands"?

For any candidate (regardless of party) to earn my vote, he or she, has to start by campaigning on more than just race and gender.

Why are you complacent with so much less?

---

When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.

Is there anything Harris could do to earn your vote?
If not, why should she listen to your "demands"?

For any candidate (regardless of party) to earn my vote, he or she, has to start by campaigning on more than just race and gender.

Why are you complacent with so much less?

Right, for you the candidate has to invent an elaborate fantasy world where every inconvenient fact is part of an elaborate global conspiracy of corruption that they and they alone can defeat.

I admit, your standards are higher than mine.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Imagine the world right now had an attempt been made on the other party.

---

For any candidate (regardless of party) to earn my vote, he or she, has to start by campaigning on more than just race and gender.

Why are you complacent with so much less?

Right, for you the candidate has to invent an elaborate fantasy world where every inconvenient fact is part of an elaborate global conspiracy of corruption that they and they alone can defeat.

I admit, your standards are higher than mine.

Does your therapist know how far down the rabbit hole you really are?

---

When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.

Right, for you the candidate has to invent an elaborate fantasy world where every inconvenient fact is part of an elaborate global conspiracy of corruption that they and they alone can defeat.

I admit, your standards are higher than mine.

Does your therapist know how far down the rabbit hole you really are?

Therapists don't talk politics unless you bring it up.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Does your therapist know how far down the rabbit hole you really are?

Therapists don't talk politics unless you bring it up.

Odds are 90% of therapist's are left leaning anyway. It's a beta occupation.

---

Does your therapist know how far down the rabbit hole you really are?

Therapists don't talk politics unless you bring it up.

We're not talking politics; we're talking about the delusional paranoia that renders you incapable of any rational discussion of politics.  Perhaps if you take a moment to re-read the last three posts, you will better understand.
  
You asked about Harris "earning" my vote.
I responded by stating what, for me, is the entry point for consideration.
You dove down the rabbit hole, covering your ears and pulling the ground in around you.

---

When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.

Therapists don't talk politics unless you bring it up.

We're not talking politics; we're talking about the delusional paranoia that renders you incapable of any rational discussion of politics.  Perhaps if you take a moment to re-read the last three posts, you will better understand.
  
You asked about Harris "earning" my vote.
I responded by stating what, for me, is the entry point for consideration.
You dove down the rabbit hole, covering your ears and pulling the ground in around you.

Quick question.

Do you actually think there is a rational discussion of politics on this board?

---

Therapists don't talk politics unless you bring it up.

We're not talking politics; we're talking about the delusional paranoia that renders you incapable of any rational discussion of politics.  Perhaps if you take a moment to re-read the last three posts, you will better understand.
  
You asked about Harris "earning" my vote.
I responded by stating what, for me, is the entry point for consideration.
You dove down the rabbit hole, covering your ears and pulling the ground in around you.

No, I'm insulting you and your candidate.  I'm only marginally interested in rational conversation at this time.  I doubt I'm able to reach you on that level, so reaching you on a more emotional level seems better.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

We're not talking politics; we're talking about the delusional paranoia that renders you incapable of any rational discussion of politics.  Perhaps if you take a moment to re-read the last three posts, you will better understand.
  
You asked about Harris "earning" my vote.
I responded by stating what, for me, is the entry point for consideration.
You dove down the rabbit hole, covering your ears and pulling the ground in around you.

Quick question.

Do you actually think there is a rational discussion of politics on this board?

Some of us are capable of having such discussions and make efforts to do so.  Others, not so much and then there is the one individual at the far end of that spectrum.

---

When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.

Quick question.

Do you actually think there is a rational discussion of politics on this board?

Some of us are capable of having such discussions and make efforts to do so.  Others, not so much and then there is the one individual at the far end of that spectrum.

I'll humor you.  Let's be rational and logical.
Here's what I said:

for you the candidate has to invent an elaborate fantasy world where every inconvenient fact is part of an elaborate global conspiracy of corruption that they and they alone can defeat.

You replied calling this post delusional and saying I retreated down a rabbit hole. 
Instead, why don't you show which part of my statement is false? I'll give you a head start: you probably support some candidates that are nothing like I described. So for me to say all of your favored candidates are that way, would probably be false on my part, but also clearly an exaggeration intended as humor.  So let's move on.  Confining the discussion to Trump and your support of Trump only, which part of what I said is false?

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Some of us are capable of having such discussions and make efforts to do so.  Others, not so much and then there is the one individual at the far end of that spectrum.

I'll humor you.  Let's be rational and logical.
Here's what I said:

for you the candidate has to invent an elaborate fantasy world where every inconvenient fact is part of an elaborate global conspiracy of corruption that they and they alone can defeat.

You replied calling this post delusional and saying I retreated down a rabbit hole. 
Instead, why don't you show which part of my statement is false? I'll give you a head start: you probably support some candidates that are nothing like I described. So for me to say all of your favored candidates are that way, would probably be false on my part, but also clearly an exaggeration intended as humor.  So let's move on.  Confining the discussion to Trump and your support of Trump only, which part of what I said is false?

You have either the reading comprehension skills of a two-year old or the memory of Joe Biden, perhaps both.  Do you not even understand your own query?  Reread post #745, including your quoted original question to me, and my response.  The conversation wasn't about Trump at all until your TDS kicked in.  The question, YOUR question, was about Harris.

---

When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.

I'll humor you.  Let's be rational and logical.
Here's what I said:

You replied calling this post delusional and saying I retreated down a rabbit hole. 
Instead, why don't you show which part of my statement is false? I'll give you a head start: you probably support some candidates that are nothing like I described. So for me to say all of your favored candidates are that way, would probably be false on my part, but also clearly an exaggeration intended as humor.  So let's move on.  Confining the discussion to Trump and your support of Trump only, which part of what I said is false?

You have either the reading comprehension skills of a two-year old or the memory of Joe Biden, perhaps both.  Do you not even understand your own query?  Reread post #745, including your quoted original question to me, and my response.  The conversation wasn't about Trump at all until your TDS kicked in.  The question, YOUR question, was about Harris.

I have been completely above board.
I am voting for Harris because she is the only one who has a chance of defeating Trump, and defeating Trump is my number one priority.
See post #743. 
It was already about Trump.
If I'm not allowed to bring Trump into a conversation about voting for President without you crying about TDS, which one of us is being irrational?

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

You have either the reading comprehension skills of a two-year old or the memory of Joe Biden, perhaps both.  Do you not even understand your own query?  Reread post #745, including your quoted original question to me, and my response.  The conversation wasn't about Trump at all until your TDS kicked in.  The question, YOUR question, was about Harris.

I have been completely above board.
I am voting for Harris because she is the only one who has a chance of defeating Trump, and defeating Trump is my number one priority.
See post #743. 
It was already about Trump.
If I'm not allowed to bring Trump into a conversation about voting for President without you crying about TDS, which one of us is being irrational?

Might as well let 10 year olds vote then.

 " I'm not voting for him because he called me a doo doo head poo poo face". Buuwhaahahawwawaaa!!

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

I have been completely above board.
I am voting for Harris because she is the only one who has a chance of defeating Trump, and defeating Trump is my number one priority.
See post #743. 
It was already about Trump.
If I'm not allowed to bring Trump into a conversation about voting for President without you crying about TDS, which one of us is being irrational?

Might as well let 10 year olds vote then.

 " I'm not voting for him because he called me a doo doo head poo poo face". Buuwhaahahawwawaaa!!

He didn't call me anything.  I'm a middle aged white dude who's registered Republican and has Jewish ancestry.  That [BLEEP] worships the ground folks like me walk on, in terms of his rhetoric.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Might as well let 10 year olds vote then.

 " I'm not voting for him because he called me a doo doo head poo poo face". Buuwhaahahawwawaaa!!

He didn't call me anything.  I'm a middle aged white dude who's registered Republican and has Jewish ancestry.  That [BLEEP] worships the ground folks like me walk on, in terms of his rhetoric.

LOL  

You missed the obvious point that your decision making for your vote is at about the same intelligence level as a ten year old kids would be.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

He didn't call me anything.  I'm a middle aged white dude who's registered Republican and has Jewish ancestry.  That [BLEEP] worships the ground folks like me walk on, in terms of his rhetoric.

LOL  

You missed the obvious point that your decision making for your vote is at about the same intelligence level as a ten year old kids would be.

Some things really are simple enough for 10 year olds though.  Some election years are complicated.  This one's simple.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.