Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Democrats! Sell me on Harris!


(08-23-2024, 03:56 PM)Caldrac Wrote: https://www.instagram.com/p/C_Bf3OEOzRf/...cHA1azJ5aA==

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

That's the MSM "fact-checking" Kamala Harris.  You know they are not to be trusted.  Everything they do has an ulterior motive, even when they're telling the truth.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Something seems off. Need to be on alert. It's odd when flagship media outlets for the Democrat's begin doing 180's on the leading candidate. Especially after building her up.

It's a red flag. As if they're trying to get ahead of something and they're in the know of something around the corner. Black swan event more than likely.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
[Image: 4SXW6gC.png]

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."
Reply


(08-23-2024, 04:00 PM)The Real Marty Wrote:
(08-23-2024, 03:56 PM)Caldrac Wrote: https://www.instagram.com/p/C_Bf3OEOzRf/...cHA1azJ5aA==

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

That's the MSM "fact-checking" Kamala Harris.  You know they are not to be trusted.  Everything they do has an ulterior motive, even when they're telling the truth.

When they’re selectively telling the truth.

Poor Marty. I know you want to desperately believe in the integrity of a MSM which joins you in your alacritous hate for a single man. But the fact of the matter is they see Harris as a losing battle. They realize they cannot prop her stupid [BLEEP] up so they’re jumping ship from the USS Support Kamala back to the USS Hate Donald Trump. Besides, that strategy brings in a much bigger paycheck. 

At least you have a familiar ship to sail on.
Reply

(This post was last modified: 08-23-2024, 04:23 PM by Caldrac.)

https://www.instagram.com/p/C_Bn64WJekr/...hpZXhjc2pl

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

https://www.instagram.com/p/C_BnbjUPRFt/...cmpxaDJwaA==

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
[Image: 4SXW6gC.png]

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."
Reply


(08-23-2024, 04:01 PM)Caldrac Wrote: Something seems off. Need to be on alert. It's odd when flagship media outlets for the Democrat's begin doing 180's on the leading candidate. Especially after building her up.

It's a red flag. As if they're trying to get ahead of something and they're in the know of something around the corner. Black swan event more than likely.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

I've said previously that I think the powers that be on the left, the ones behind the scenes that aren't on board with Kamala being the nominee, are using their surrogates in the media to sabotage her so that the nomination in '28 is up for grabs which will not be going up against a sitting President since Trump will be leaving office.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(08-23-2024, 04:01 PM)Caldrac Wrote: Something seems off. Need to be on alert. It's odd when flagship media outlets for the Democrat's begin doing 180's on the leading candidate. Especially after building her up.

It's a red flag. As if they're trying to get ahead of something and they're in the know of something around the corner. Black swan event more than likely.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

I don’t think so. The mainstream media now realizes that with the convention over, Harris can no longer survive on canned statements. She has to speak off-the-cuff and hold press conferences if she hopes to be a serious candidate. They know she is incapable of doing so. Unfortunately, seething hate for Donald Trump doesn’t make her smart.

You have to ask yourself, when is the last time the mainstream media made the effort to fact check a Democrat presidential candidate. Or for that matter, even questioned that candidate’s record. They may have done cursory drive-bys, but not to the level they are with Heels Up.
Reply

(This post was last modified: 08-23-2024, 04:36 PM by Caldrac.)

(08-23-2024, 04:28 PM)homebiscuit Wrote:
(08-23-2024, 04:01 PM)Caldrac Wrote: Something seems off. Need to be on alert. It's odd when flagship media outlets for the Democrat's begin doing 180's on the leading candidate. Especially after building her up.

It's a red flag. As if they're trying to get ahead of something and they're in the know of something around the corner. Black swan event more than likely.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

I don’t think so. The mainstream media now realizes that with the convention over, Harris can no longer survive on canned statements. She has to speak off-the-cuff and hold press conferences if she hopes to be a serious candidate. They know she is incapable of doing so. Unfortunately, seething hate for Donald Trump doesn’t make her smart.

You have to ask yourself, when is the last time the mainstream media made the effort to fact check a Democrat presidential candidate. Or for that matter, even questioned that candidate’s record. They may have done cursory drive-bys, but not to the level they are with Heels Up.
That's why I am concerned.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

(08-23-2024, 04:25 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote:
(08-23-2024, 04:01 PM)Caldrac Wrote: Something seems off. Need to be on alert. It's odd when flagship media outlets for the Democrat's begin doing 180's on the leading candidate. Especially after building her up.

It's a red flag. As if they're trying to get ahead of something and they're in the know of something around the corner. Black swan event more than likely.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

I've said previously that I think the powers that be on the left, the ones behind the scenes that aren't on board with Kamala being the nominee, are using their surrogates in the media to sabotage her so that the nomination in '28 is up for grabs which will not be going up against a sitting President since Trump will be leaving office.
That's a huge risk. Giving him essentially 4 years to build up a strong, viable successor as well for 28'.

Would be easier to lie through your teeth for her and perform damage control for the next 4 years instead.

I am telling you. Something seems off here.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
[Image: 4SXW6gC.png]

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."
Reply


https://twitter.com/VivekGRamaswamy/stat...crcLA&s=19

All Aboard!!!

Congrats to my friend RFK Jr. on his impactful campaign that opened the eyes of so many Americans. He started as a Democrat. He continued as an Independent. He concluded as a great American. We have a nation to unite & I know he will play a vital role in helping get us there.
[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply


(08-23-2024, 09:02 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: https://twitter.com/OneBadDude_/status/1...WtEdA&s=19

That is hilarious and perfectly deployed.
Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(08-23-2024, 11:00 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(08-23-2024, 09:50 AM)Jag149 Wrote: Yes, we agree on those 3 lines. However, you being purposely obtuse when you are wrong and trying to change the subject is getting pretty lame.

You just lumped violent law-breaking protesters with non-violent protesters to make your point, but I'm the one being obtuse.  OK.

You have lumped everyone peacefully protesting the election on Jan 6 as insurrectionist for years.  You have made a violent protest by a few into a resurrection and regardless of new data refuse to move off of that decision.  Your very response explains you 100%.  Intentionally or not this is all you.
Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

Reply


(08-23-2024, 04:00 PM)The Real Marty Wrote:
(08-23-2024, 03:56 PM)Caldrac Wrote: https://www.instagram.com/p/C_Bf3OEOzRf/...cHA1azJ5aA==

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

That's the MSM "fact-checking" Kamala Harris.  You know they are not to be trusted.  Everything they do has an ulterior motive, even when they're telling the truth.

Are you finally getting it?  Doubtful your cynicism screams volumes
Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

Reply


(08-23-2024, 05:35 PM)copycat Wrote:
(08-23-2024, 11:00 AM)mikesez Wrote: You just lumped violent law-breaking protesters with non-violent protesters to make your point, but I'm the one being obtuse.  OK.

You have lumped everyone peacefully protesting the election on Jan 6 as insurrectionist for years.  You have made a violent protest by a few into a resurrection and regardless of new data refuse to move off of that decision.  Your very response explains you 100%.  Intentionally or not this is all you.

No.  Completely wrong.
Approximately 2500 people entered the Capitol.
Each and every one of them, regardless of if they stole anything, or punched anyone, was trespassing with intent to disrupt a constitutionally mandated proceeding.
They showed up when Trump said to show up and only left when he said to leave.
They are the only ones I have ever been talking about.
It's all you guys who try so hard to deny this reality that unfolded on live TV, who try to say that I'm talking about more people or less things than I'm actually talking about.  There were peaceful folks at the ellipse and on the lawn that day.  But you can't call any of the ones who trespassed peaceful. And insurrection isn't about numbers.  In theory an act of insurrection could involve just one person.  You guys keep adding to what I'm saying to try to catch me in a contradiction.  Just enter reality with me!
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


(08-23-2024, 05:50 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(08-23-2024, 05:35 PM)copycat Wrote: You have lumped everyone peacefully protesting the election on Jan 6 as insurrectionist for years.  You have made a violent protest by a few into a resurrection and regardless of new data refuse to move off of that decision.  Your very response explains you 100%.  Intentionally or not this is all you.

No.  Completely wrong.
Approximately 2500 people entered the Capitol.
Each and every one of them, regardless of if they stole anything, or punched anyone, was trespassing with intent to disrupt a constitutionally mandated proceeding.
They showed up when Trump said to show up and only left when he said to leave.
They are the only ones I have ever been talking about.
It's all you guys who try so hard to deny this reality that unfolded on live TV, who try to say that I'm talking about more people or less things than I'm actually talking about.  There were peaceful folks at the ellipse and on the lawn that day.  But you can't call any of the ones who trespassed peaceful. And insurrection isn't about numbers.  In theory an act of insurrection could involve just one person.  You guys keep adding to what I'm saying to try to catch me in a contradiction.  Just enter reality with me!
Laughing Laughing Gold Mikey, pure gold. Laughing
Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


(This post was last modified: 08-23-2024, 06:01 PM by OG-JAGFAN. Edited 2 times in total.)

(08-23-2024, 04:00 PM)The Real Marty Wrote:
(08-23-2024, 03:56 PM)Caldrac Wrote: https://www.instagram.com/p/C_Bf3OEOzRf/...cHA1azJ5aA==

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

That's the MSM "fact-checking" Kamala Harris.  You know they are not to be trusted.  Everything they do has an ulterior motive, even when they're telling the truth.

All they have it, "WE ARE NOT TRUMP"

Democratic party has does not have any merit or anything to stand on.  They only have, "Trump is this and trump is that"  How about they talk about what achievements they have done instead of the tired criticizing Trump line. As someone posted recently, the Democrats have controlled the white house 12 out of the last 16 years. (Obama, then Biden*Obama* again) But somehow all the countries problems are somehow Trump's fault.  The Democrats are lying to people and unfortunately the low IQ people will eat it up.
Reply


(08-23-2024, 03:00 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:
(08-23-2024, 02:37 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: RFK endorses Trump

https://x.com/nypost/status/182705026079...6_z4g&s=19

https://x.com/ProudElephantUS/status/182...DPJ8A&s=19

Honestly, I had my doubts with who his wife is. Smart move.

He is an old hippy liberal who hasn't gone boomer crazy and switched to fascism to control everyone. He knows if the democrats succeed, the country is over.

Hopefully Trump wins and then dismantles the deepstate apparatus called the federal government. No more being nice and trying to work within it. Trump said today that he wants the resignations on his desk by 12PM from all the leadership involved with the Afghanistan withdrawal. That should help clear out a lot of the military politicians.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
Reply


(08-23-2024, 05:50 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(08-23-2024, 05:35 PM)copycat Wrote: You have lumped everyone peacefully protesting the election on Jan 6 as insurrectionist for years.  You have made a violent protest by a few into a resurrection and regardless of new data refuse to move off of that decision.  Your very response explains you 100%.  Intentionally or not this is all you.

No.  Completely wrong.
Approximately 2500 people entered the Capitol.
Each and every one of them, regardless of if they stole anything, or punched anyone, was trespassing with intent to disrupt a constitutionally mandated proceeding.
They showed up when Trump said to show up and only left when he said to leave.
They are the only ones I have ever been talking about.
It's all you guys who try so hard to deny this reality that unfolded on live TV, who try to say that I'm talking about more people or less things than I'm actually talking about.  There were peaceful folks at the ellipse and on the lawn that day.  But you can't call any of the ones who trespassed peaceful. And insurrection isn't about numbers.  In theory an act of insurrection could involve just one person.  You guys keep adding to what I'm saying to try to catch me in a contradiction.  Just enter reality with me!

Your very reply of “what you saw on live TV” is your very downfall.  YOU only saw what they wanted you to see.  You reject new information no matter how many times it is offered.  New live video is dismissed.  New email information is rejected.  You are the antithesis of everything you project to be, openminded.  You have made up your mind and nothing will ever move you.  Some self reflection is in order but you will again reject that suggestion because Orange man bad!
Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

Reply


(08-23-2024, 06:05 PM)copycat Wrote:
(08-23-2024, 05:50 PM)mikesez Wrote: No.  Completely wrong.
Approximately 2500 people entered the Capitol.
Each and every one of them, regardless of if they stole anything, or punched anyone, was trespassing with intent to disrupt a constitutionally mandated proceeding.
They showed up when Trump said to show up and only left when he said to leave.
They are the only ones I have ever been talking about.
It's all you guys who try so hard to deny this reality that unfolded on live TV, who try to say that I'm talking about more people or less things than I'm actually talking about.  There were peaceful folks at the ellipse and on the lawn that day.  But you can't call any of the ones who trespassed peaceful. And insurrection isn't about numbers.  In theory an act of insurrection could involve just one person.  You guys keep adding to what I'm saying to try to catch me in a contradiction.  Just enter reality with me!

Your very reply of “what you saw on live TV” is your very downfall.  YOU only saw what they wanted you to see.  You reject new information no matter how many times it is offered.  New live video is dismissed.  New email information is rejected.  You are the antithesis of everything you project to be, openminded.  You have made up your mind and nothing will ever move you.  Some self reflection is in order but you will again reject that suggestion because Orange man bad!

I agree there was a lot of stuff that wasn't shown live on TV.  The multiple weapons caches that the proud boys set up, for instance, only became known later. The fact that Trump was actually in the dining room, watching the same live TV as it all unfolded, and gave no orders to anyone during that time, was also unknown for those of us watching live.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(08-23-2024, 06:08 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(08-23-2024, 06:05 PM)copycat Wrote: Your very reply of “what you saw on live TV” is your very downfall.  YOU only saw what they wanted you to see.  You reject new information no matter how many times it is offered.  New live video is dismissed.  New email information is rejected.  You are the antithesis of everything you project to be, openminded.  You have made up your mind and nothing will ever move you.  Some self reflection is in order but you will again reject that suggestion because Orange man bad!

I agree there was a lot of stuff that wasn't shown live on TV.  The multiple weapons caches that the proud boys set up, for instance, only became known later. The fact that Trump was actually in the dining room, watching the same live TV as it all unfolded, and gave no orders to anyone during that time, was also unknown for those of us watching live.

“Facepalm”. 

Your every response again exposes you and you with all of your self proclaimed intellectual superiority still cannot resolve the disparity.
Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

Reply


(08-23-2024, 06:24 PM)copycat Wrote:
(08-23-2024, 06:08 PM)mikesez Wrote: I agree there was a lot of stuff that wasn't shown live on TV.  The multiple weapons caches that the proud boys set up, for instance, only became known later. The fact that Trump was actually in the dining room, watching the same live TV as it all unfolded, and gave no orders to anyone during that time, was also unknown for those of us watching live.

“Facepalm”. 

Your every response again exposes you and you with all of your self proclaimed intellectual superiority still cannot resolve the disparity.

What did I say that isn't true?
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


https://www.instagram.com/reel/C_BrlEmSR...14OWxwaHo0

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
[Image: 4SXW6gC.png]

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!