LAFD officials demand chief’s ouster for wildfires mismanagement

Accusations of homophobia in 3…2…1

---

---

As the facts come out the LA fires there appears to be criminal case building for some people.

Warned by the police Union that people will pay the ultimate price for the cuts they were making
Knew about the fires Jan 2 but failed to preposition assets.
Mayor left for travel to an event that had nothing to do with LA. (paid for by LA taxpayers)
Jan 4 fire breaks out and it was 45 minutes before the first truck arrived. (they only deployed 4 unit the first day)
Newsome vetoed numerous bills that would have enabled controlled burns and other land management tactics.
Newsome waited till Jan 8 to call out the guard.
LA has continually failed response time for many years. They have the same amount of fire resources they had in the 60's.

As this goes on it is going to be very interesting. Remember how they laughed at Florida during the hanging chad incident?
Body count at present 25 dead 26 missing. The indirect death count is said to be much higher, in the thousands. Whether this is true or not read the article below. The Fire Union chief was correct.

https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2025/...thousands/

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

I'm really getting a kick out of the narrative the hard left media are trying to promote by characterizing tech, media and other companies which pulled away from the leftist madness as "trying to get on Trump's good side".

It's a shame CNN didn't take the opportunity to come back to the center and be relevant again. Like MSNBC and the rest of the left-wing bots, they're stuck on stupid.

---

If you’ve ever had a parking ticket in LA for parking next to a gay painted fire hydrant, demand a refund. They were just decorations. Newsome and Bass, it’s time to resign!!

---

I’m waiting for Biden to issue a last minute decree in favor of TikTok which coincides with a sizable “consultant” contract for Hunter.

---

2 days, libtards!!

---

They can fill those reservoirs in California with the tears?

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

They can fill those reservoirs in California with the tears?

Doesn't matter, they'd dump that in the ocean too..

---

Ok so Biden declared the 28th amendment ratified and part of the constitution on his way out the door. Really cool, but he cannot do that. For the admendment to be included in the constitution the congress would need to start the process all over again. The last process expired in like 1979 or so if I remember correctly. The President plays no part in amending the constitution. What is interesting if he really believes he did this it may provide grounds to make invalid things he did in these last few weeks based on his mental state of mind..

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

Ok so Biden declared the 28th amendment ratified and part of the constitution on his way out the door. Really cool, but he cannot do that. For the admendment to be included in the constitution the congress would need to start the process all over again. The last process expired in like 1979 or so if I remember correctly.  The President plays no part in amending the constitution. What is interesting if he really believes he did this it may provide grounds to make invalid things he did in these last few weeks based on his mental state of mind..

He's trying to appease the stupid people of his party. 

Like when he said that he was going to cure cancer..

---

Ok so Biden declared the 28th amendment ratified and part of the constitution on his way out the door. Really cool, but he cannot do that. For the admendment to be included in the constitution the congress would need to start the process all over again. The last process expired in like 1979 or so if I remember correctly.  The President plays no part in amending the constitution. What is interesting if he really believes he did this it may provide grounds to make invalid things he did in these last few weeks based on his mental state of mind..

He's trying to appease the stupid people of his party. 

Like when he said that he was going to cure cancer..

Well on the bright side noon on Monday, Trump is officially president whether he has been sworn in or not.

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

Ok so Biden declared the 28th amendment ratified and part of the constitution on his way out the door. Really cool, but he cannot do that. For the admendment to be included in the constitution the congress would need to start the process all over again. The last process expired in like 1979 or so if I remember correctly.  The President plays no part in amending the constitution. What is interesting if he really believes he did this it may provide grounds to make invalid things he did in these last few weeks based on his mental state of mind..

The argument is that 2/3 of Congress only has the authority to begin the process, but never to put a deadline on it. Previous proposals to amend the constitution did not come with deadlines. 
I'm sympathetic to the argument, but I doubt that the Congress in the 70s would have reached the two-thirds majority if they hadn't added a deadline to the proposal. 
Also, the Supreme Court has behaved as if the equal rights amendment is in place since before Ruth Bader Ginsburg was appointed. See the movie On the Basis of Sex.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

LAFD officials demand chief’s ouster for wildfires mismanagement

Accusations of homophobia in 3…2…1

I hope she goes down swinging and takes city officials with her.  DWP's incompetence at taking more than 12 months and still not replacing a cover and keeping power lines energized at the height of the winds.

---

CCL Stroudcrowd1

---

Ok so Biden declared the 28th amendment ratified and part of the constitution on his way out the door. Really cool, but he cannot do that. For the admendment to be included in the constitution the congress would need to start the process all over again. The last process expired in like 1979 or so if I remember correctly.  The President plays no part in amending the constitution. What is interesting if he really believes he did this it may provide grounds to make invalid things he did in these last few weeks based on his mental state of mind..

The argument is that 2/3 of Congress only has the authority to begin the process, but never to put a deadline on it. Previous proposals to amend the constitution did not come with deadlines. 
I'm sympathetic to the argument, but I doubt that the Congress in the 70s would have reached the two-thirds majority if they hadn't added a deadline to the proposal. 
Also, the Supreme Court has behaved as if the equal rights amendment is in place since before Ruth Bader Ginsburg was appointed. See the movie On the Basis of Sex.

Well, if this article is correct then Biden was deranged.

The ERA was proposed in 1923 and passed Congress in 1972. Under U.S. law, amendments to the Constitution must be ratified by three-fourths, or 38 of the 50, state legislatures. They do not require presidential approval. By a 1982 deadline, only 35 states had ratified the amendment.

also a few states have repealed it so he is still short.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-s...025-01-17/

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

Mike and Marty, your people want him done, but it's not gonna work.

https://twitter.com/WCdispatch_/status/1...Odv5A&s=19

---

Maybe all this has to do with security. The White house is a fortress.

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.

The argument is that 2/3 of Congress only has the authority to begin the process, but never to put a deadline on it. Previous proposals to amend the constitution did not come with deadlines. 
I'm sympathetic to the argument, but I doubt that the Congress in the 70s would have reached the two-thirds majority if they hadn't added a deadline to the proposal. 
Also, the Supreme Court has behaved as if the equal rights amendment is in place since before Ruth Bader Ginsburg was appointed. See the movie On the Basis of Sex.

Well, if this article is correct then Biden was deranged.

The ERA was proposed in 1923 and passed Congress in 1972. Under U.S. law, amendments to the Constitution must be ratified by three-fourths, or 38 of the 50, state legislatures. They do not require presidential approval. By a 1982 deadline, only 35 states had ratified the amendment.

also a few states have repealed it so  he is still short.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-s...025-01-17/

People also say that a state cannot un-ratify an amendment.  Not for me to decide.  The Supreme Court has basically already decided that it was ratified but it does not apply to abortion and other pregnancy related laws.  
I would care more if there were other potential amendments floating out there with this one as a precedent but there aren't.
The other one floating around there is the balanced budget amendment, which has maybe been proposed by 34 states, depending on how you count and whether there are deadlines on a proposal from a state. The ERA isn't precedent because Congress passed it first. Congress has never proposed a balanced budget amendment. If Congress continues to not act, the balanced budget amendment would have to start with a "convention of states" and no one is sure how one is supposed to be called.
The founders did not think article V through very precisely.
There is a FAFO factor, because if Biden is allowed to "declare" the ERA into effect, then Trump can similarly "declare" that it's finally time for an article V convention, based on calls states sent out 40 and 50 years ago. It's all theater though, because if the article V convention is seen as "Trump's convention" there will definitely be more than 13 states refusing to participate and nothing will be ratified.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Well, if this article is correct then Biden was deranged.

The ERA was proposed in 1923 and passed Congress in 1972. Under U.S. law, amendments to the Constitution must be ratified by three-fourths, or 38 of the 50, state legislatures. They do not require presidential approval. By a 1982 deadline, only 35 states had ratified the amendment.

also a few states have repealed it so  he is still short.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-s...025-01-17/

People also say that a state cannot un-ratify an amendment.  Not for me to decide.  The Supreme Court has basically already decided that it was ratified but it does not apply to abortion and other pregnancy related laws.  
I would care more if there were other potential amendments floating out there with this one as a precedent but there aren't.
The other one floating around there is the balanced budget amendment, which has maybe been proposed by 34 states, depending on how you count and whether there are deadlines on a proposal from a state.
The founders did not think article V through very precisely.
There is a FAFO factor, because if Biden is allowed to "declare" the ERA into effect, then Trump can similarly "declare" that it's finally time for an article V convention, based on calls states sent out 40 and 50 years ago.  It's all theater though, because if the article V convention is seen as "Trump's convention" there will definitely be more than 13 states refusing to participate and nothing will be ratified.

Just noise so lawyers can make some money. Biden keep pushing there will be an attempt to prove he is not of sound mind these last few weeks and thus his decisions reversed.

---

A new broom always sweeps clean.