Odd, nothing about Benghazi, expected more with the emails.

---

Odd, nothing about Benghazi, expected more with the emails.

 

Because no one besides Trump supporters really care about these e-mails anymore.

---

Trump logic.. how do you specifically bring the jobs back. First off.. you don't let it happen..

 

Trump never answered the question. He kept repeating himself: don't let them leave, don't let them leave . . . but said nothing about how to prevent them from leaving.

---

Because Trump is a rambler. He goes off on tangents that deviate so far from whatever is being discussed. Hillary is going to continue to demolish him in these debates. He's literally like an undrafted rookie WR lining up against Richard Sherman. He honestly isn't in the same realm of intelligence. Hillary has been in the political scene her whole life. Trump just wandered through the gift shop. 

She has more experience, that's just how it's going to be. 

 

Trump is still making strong points and it speaks volumes that the polls are still close. You think she would have smashed him by now.

---

Trump never answered the question. He kept repeating himself: don't let them leave, don't let them leave . . . but said nothing about how to prevent them from leaving.

 

That's a typical Trump answer. This fool has no real outline on what the hell to do. He's flying by the seat of his pants with every question. In what kind of America do you want a president who is unprepared.

---

I think it is lucky for Trump he's up against Clinton. Obama would have humiliated him on that form.

---

I think it is lucky for Trump he's up against Clinton. Obama would have humiliated him on that form.

For it being Trumps 1st one on one debate and her 15th, I think he did pretty well for the most part. It can't be easy.

---

Trump looks nervous.

 

He does not know how to debate with one other person. The inexperience showed every minute he was on stage.

 

Lester Holt losing control.

 

He was awful. The last thing voters need is candidates talking over each other. What did Holt think his job was?

 

I hope the next debate does not have an "open discussion" period when they can blurt out anything at any time.

 

Trump needs to chill a bit. He's getting excited.

 

He accused Clinton of not having a good temperament for the presidency while showing he is the candidate with that problem. What was his logic? She smiled, used professional body language, and didn't yell at him. That is the benefit of watching the debate on TV: you see the real personalities come out while hearing their policy positions and plans.

 

Remember, presidential debates play a big role for many undecided voters. There also are voters who will change their minds one way or the other this week.

---

Baring shutting off mics, there isn't a lot a moderator can do.

---

Ford is moving small car production to Mexico.

So they can use the lines for SUV and trucks. I know this as 100% fact.

---

So they can use the lines for SUV and trucks. I know this as 100% fact.

Nobody said Ford was moving ALL production to Mexico. Trump didn't say that either. But they ARE moving small car production to Mexico.

---

The protectionism he talked about early was unbelievable coming from a republican. It was way left of the democratic party. 

---

Nobody said Ford was moving ALL production to Mexico. Trump didn't say that either. But they ARE moving small car production to Mexico.

To save jobs!!!!!!

---

I'm a Trump supporter but I gotta hand this one to Crooked Hillary. He dominated the first 20 minutes or so, but went on the defensive for the last part of the debate. Let his foot off the gas pedal. Kinda like the Jags sitting on a one point lead. He needs to prepare better for the next debate so he can attack crooked Hillary more effectively so as to expose her for the lying hag that she is.

---

Make the Jags Great Again
Blake Bortles......YOU'RE FIRED!
Dave Caldwell.....YOU'RE FIRED!

Clinton's arguments are so weak.

 

Which arguments are weak?

 

When Hillary says Trump has something to hide I can't help but laugh.

 

She has a very good point there. If Trump has nothing to hide, why doesn't he show the public what they want to see? The fact that all presidential candidates have been releasing tax returns for over 40 years (if not more) except Trump is a red flag that he is hiding something. There is nothing funny about a billionaire owner of multiple huge businesses refusing to publish tax returns and giving no reason not to do it.

---

Gotta admit, I am a bit confused by the responses on the whole moving business to other countries thing. In the debate, Trump said the best way to get jobs back was to keep them from leaving. Clinton talked about changing tax structures. At least that was my take. Seems like that might be what Trump is talking about as well, but in a different way? From what I can tell, Trump wants to drop our max corporate tax rate to 15%, whereas Clinton wants to put changes in place to prevent inversion. Am I missing something or is this pretty much the deal? I mean realistically, if a company can shift a division and save 75% in labor costs, why wouldn't they? Not sure how either of their plans changes the math and keeps jobs here, although Clinton's plan regarding inversions seems to make more sense to me.

---

<p class="bbc_left">Education is the cheap defense of nations. - Edmund Burke

<p class="bbc_left"> 

<p class="bbc_left">Or is it from Burke? I tried finding the source, and looked through some of his writings, no luck. Anybody with google-fu got a citation of the source?

One take home from the debate is you can basically lie and speculate as much as you want and the casual voter won't fact check, so if you can be louder and get more applause even when you aren't supposed to be applauding, that is what the uninformed, casual voter leaves with... Probably explains why poll numbers won't really move.

---

Trump looked bad. At one point I thought he was gonna fall over. He also brought no specifics and rarely answered any questions directly.


Hillary looke more healthy than trump. She also was clearly prepared and on her game.


I'm biased, obviously.... But I don't even think it was close. She wiped the floor with him.

---

Trump looked bad. At one point I thought he was gonna fall over. He also brought no specifics and rarely answered any questions directly.


Hillary looke more healthy than trump. She also was clearly prepared and on her game.


I'm biased, obviously.... But I don't even think it was close. She wiped the floor with him.

I am so used to agreeing with you on the football side of the board I have to switch gears when I get in here!

---

Gotta admit, I am a bit confused by the responses on the whole moving business to other countries thing. In the debate, Trump said the best way to get jobs back was to keep them from leaving. Clinton talked about changing tax structures. At least that was my take. Seems like that might be what Trump is talking about as well, but in a different way? From what I can tell, Trump wants to drop our max corporate tax rate to 15%, whereas Clinton wants to put changes in place to prevent inversion. Am I missing something or is this pretty much the deal? I mean realistically, if a company can shift a division and save 75% in labor costs, why wouldn't they? Not sure how either of their plans changes the math and keeps jobs here, although Clinton's plan regarding inversions seems to make more sense to me.

Trump wants a vat tax on imported goods. He also thinks that lower cit taxes will incentivise growth and companies to stay... His policies are trickle down, sometimes called supply side economics.


Hillary is looking to government investments as ways to subsidize growth in certain sectors... Education, renewable resources, and infrasructure investment. All of which she claimz can be accomplished via making the wealthy pay a higher tax rate then they have in the recent past.


That's it in a nut shell.

---