The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Forget Adrian Peterson - Jags get RB Melvin Gordon Draft Scenario
|
Forget the Adrian Peterson trade scenario. What would you all think about this draft? Cleveland trades up to #2 with Tennesse to get Mariota. Then the Saints, who have done some wacky things this off season, come calling to trade up to #3. In this scenario, the vikings take Gurley at #11 (I think Adrian Peterson ends up in Dallas). Dave Caldwell decides not to wait on a RB and grabs Melvin Gordon, knowing that a very good LEO will still be there at the end of round 1. Then we get a starting FS in round 2, and dynamic slot WR in round 3 with Phillip Dorsett (not sure he lasts this long come draft time).
1. (13) RB Melvin Gordon - Wisonsin 1. (31) LEO Eli Harold - Virginia 2. (36) FS Eric Rowe - Utah 3. (67) WR Phillip Dorsett - Miami 3. (75) DE/DT Xavier Cooper - Washington State 4. (103) ILB Ramik Wilson - Georgia Not realistic? I think Gurley and Gordon are special, and all the RB's after them can be interchanged and are a toss up. I would prefer Gurley, but Gordon is healthy now and would give us some star power and be the scoring threat we need. Here's how it plays out:
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
If we stay at #3 and take Leonard Williams, who we don't need really, we are just going to end up having to use the 2nd round pick on a LEO (probably Eli Harold or Danielle Hunter) anyway, so why not trade #3 and get some extra picks while filling just about all of our needs with dynamic players AND getting a clear cut starting RB, not "just a guy to compete"?
I think this particular scenario is unrealistic. The Saints are in rebuild mode. They aren't giving up that many picks for one player. They need to completely restock their own offense.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
Quote:I think this particular scenario is unrealistic. The Saints are in rebuild mode. They aren't giving up that many picks for one player. They need to completely restock their own offense. Especially when Dupree or Gregory will most likely be there at 13 anyways... Quote:Especially when Dupree or Gregory will most likely be there at 13 anyways... In this scenario they are. Along with Ray.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
I dont see Harold falling that far. I would also rather rather stay with the 3rd pick
I admit it is far-fetched, but the Saints have done some wacky things this off season, and this just goes along with that premise. Also, Atlanta might take Bud Dupree at #9 now, so that might play into the Saints strategy. I don't think they will want Gregory with his baggae, and Ray seems to have fallen off some.
More realistic might be the Titans taking Leonard Williams after nobody offers them what they feel is enough for #2, then the Browns offering Caldwell some picks and he takes the deal. Maybe something like this. I'd love this one:
Quote:I think this particular scenario is unrealistic. The Saints are in rebuild mode. They aren't giving up that many picks for one player. They need to completely restock their own offense. Especially for an average pass rusher. Maybe a QB.
Your beliefs become your thoughts,
Your thoughts become your words, Your words become your actions, Your actions become your habits, Your habits become your values, Your values become your destiny.
If we could get Gurley/Gordon and Harold/Gregory I would be completely on board.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Looks like you have it all figured out. Im on board with this line of thought
You Gotta Be Able To Run Da' Rock~
I wouldn't draft Gordon that high, especially when there are other quality RBs in round 2 & 3.
I wouldn't take a running back anywhere in the top half of the first round and I'm a huge, huge Gurley fan.
THERE IS A SKELETON INSIDE OF YOU.
RIGHT NOW. THIS IS NOT A JOKE. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
I understand RB's have been "devalued" by the NFL, but Gurley and Gordon are special talents. They will most likely both go in the 1st round. Some people are saying, "I'd only one of them in the late 1st round." Who cares if we take one of them in the late 20's or in the early teens? What difference does it make, as long as we get one of them? Both would be the dynamic RB and star we need on this team to be a clear cut starter, not just a guy to compete, like all other RB's will probably be. We need somebody to score TD's more than we need somebody to sack the QB. We were top 10 in sacks last year, but terrible in scoring. A stud RB will only help Bortles, who is going to need all the help he can get.
There are plenty of LEO's to be taken later in the draft outside the 1st round. With the signing of Odrick, Leonard Williams is almost the last thing we need, but unfortunately I have a feeling Caldwell will feel pretty much forced to pick him at #3 due to the consensus he is the best player in the draft. Just our luck. Don't need the position at all, but we get the "best player" in the whole draft.
Quote:With the signing of Odrick, Leonard Williams is almost the last thing we need, but unfortunately I have a feeling Caldwell will feel pretty much forced to pick him at #3 due to the consensus he is the best player in the draft. Just our luck. Don't need the position at all, but we get the "best player" in the whole draft. Of all the possible reasons to pick someone over Williams I find this one to be the absolute worst. "Don't need the position at all" Really? Give me the I like this guy over Williams... but we don't have two Pro Bowl DT/DE on the roster...Both starting DT are coming off injury and Marks will most likely miss all of the off season and will hopefully be back by the start of the season. Don't need the position at all?
I'm not really feeling that. Plus, though I think the Jaguars would have some opportunities to trade down, I can't see the Saints trade happening at all. I would have said the Browns trade was far fetched too if I hadn't heard the rumors they'd be willing to do that. But apparently Tennessee wanted their 2nd rounder too and the Browns wasn't into that. Seems to me like the Browns have the leverage, they can just trade to #3 instead since I doubt another team would offer more than that. But then again that could all be made up.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:I understand RB's have been "devalued" by the NFL, but Gurley and Gordon are special talents. They will most likely both go in the 1st round. Some people are saying, "I'd only one of them in the late 1st round." Who cares if we take one of them in the late 20's or in the early teens? What difference does it make, as long as we get one of them? Both would be the dynamic RB and star we need on this team to be a clear cut starter, not just a guy to compete, like all other RB's will probably be. We need somebody to score TD's more than we need somebody to sack the QB. We were top 10 in sacks last year, but terrible in scoring. A stud RB will only help Bortles, who is going to need all the help he can get. If there's one thing I can say about this draft for certain, its that Dave isn't going to let anyone, especially the media, twist his hand into picking someone he doesn't want at any spot/round
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Quote:That's a terrible draftSo if we ended up with Melvin Gordon, Eli Harold, Eric Rowe and Phillip Dorsett you would be disappointed? Or it's a "terrible draft" because you don't believe it is realistic as far as the players being available where they are picked here? |
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.