Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Free trade in Asia, good idea?

#1

So looks like the TPP is gonna happen, to my chagrin...


Thom Hartman calls the deal SHAFTA, southern hemispheric free trade agreement. I like that term better than TPP, cuz it's gonna give workers the shaft, lol.


So, I have a feeling I already knew who's for and whose against this, but thought this should have its own thread. Watched hard ball with Chris Matthews yesterday, he's for it.. I've lost almost all respect for MSNBC.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

This is not good, not good at all

 

"Leaked details from the TPP have detailed that corporations would actually be allowed to sue local governments in a secret international tribunal for passing laws like GMO-labeling or bans on genetically modified foods, or even fracking. If it hurts corporate profits – they want to take away our right to sue for damages. Companies would be able to veto any county, state or national laws in favor of their own illicit agendas – all behind closed doors."

 

If that's true where are all in trouble.


[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

#3

That's not good at all! And the media is really not discussing this issue at the depth it deserves.
Reply

#4

Quote:That's not good at all! And the media is really not discussing this issue at the depth it deserves.
 

Agreed.

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

#5

See I knew there were things we are all in agreement about!
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

Quote:See I knew there were things we are all in agreement about!
 

Someone would have to be off their rocker to think this is a good idea.

[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

#7

Quote:Someone would have to be off their rocker to think this is a good idea.

Or a Corporate Shill.


It's kind of scary how Obama and McConnell are working on this together.  This is probably one of Obama's worst policies.  It's Crony Capitalism on a global scale.  And yet it's one of those issues that's easy for them to spin because few people are actually talking about it.  

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply

#8

All one would have to do is review the results of NAFTA to understand the implications of what this most recent back door shady deal will end up resulting in.
Your beliefs become your thoughts,
Your thoughts become your words,
Your words become your actions,
Your actions become your habits,
Your habits become your values,
Your values become your destiny.
Reply

#9

Quote:Or a Corporate Shill.

It's kind of scary how Obama and McConnell are working on this together.  This is probably one of Obama's worst policies.  It's Crony Capitalism on a global scale.  And yet it's one of those issues that's easy for them to spin because few people are actually talking about it.  
Even typical pro corporate shills are going to have hard time backing this. Agreements not made to the public? Denying the ability of congress to amend the agreement when they finally get to see what it is? Other than the corporations that bought and paid for this who could possibly be for it?

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10
(This post was last modified: 04-17-2015, 12:31 PM by The Eleventh Doctor.)

Quote:Even typical pro corporate shills are going to have hard time backing this. Agreements not made to the public? Denying the ability of congress to amend the agreement when they finally get to see what it is? Other than the corporations that bought and paid for this who could possibly be for it?
Not just that but


 

Quote: 

The TPP creates a special dispute resolution process that allows corporations to challenge any domestic laws that could adversely impact their “expected future profits.” These challenges would be heard before UN and World Bank tribunals which could require taxpayer compensation to corporations.
 

(Per Bernie Sanders)


Eric posted something similar.

 

That's a scary thought that corporations can challenge our laws if they 'impact their expected future profits'.  


It's also likely to outsource many jobs..  And I think both the left and the right don't want to outsource jobs.  Or at least i'd hope so.  Yet Mitch McConnell and Barack Obama both support this.  It just doesn't make any sense to me.

 


I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply

#11

Quote:Not just that but




(Per Bernie Sanders)


Eric posted something similar.


That's a scary thought that corporations can challenge our laws if they 'impact their expected future profits'.


It's also likely to outsource many jobs.. And I think both the left and the right don't want to outsource jobs. Or at least i'd hope so. Yet Mitch McConnell and Barack Obama both support this. It just doesn't make any sense to me.


The whole thing is nutso.
Reply

#12

Quote:That's not good at all! And the media is really not discussing this issue at the depth it deserves.
Were you honestly expecting them to discuss this in some meaningful way?  Hillary stopped for lunch at Krystal.  Priorities. 

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=59]
Reply

#13

This is indeed a lousy deal, especially knowing that the UN/World Bank will be the ones enforcing this.  Having at least one of the most corrupt organizations in the world (The UN) handle this is bound to create all sorts of problems.   

 

People who are surprised Obama and McConnell are working on this together really don't have a clue who Mitch McConnell is.  He's nothing more than Harry Reid 2


Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=59]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

Quote:So looks like the TPP is gonna happen, to my chagrin...


Thom Hartman calls the deal SHAFTA, southern hemispheric free trade agreement. I like that term better than TPP, cuz it's gonna give workers the shaft, lol.


So, I have a feeling I already knew who's for and whose against this, but thought this should have its own thread. Watched hard ball with Chris Matthews yesterday, he's for it.. I've lost almost all respect for MSNBC.
 

That tells me all I need to know.

 

 

Quote:Someone would have to be off their rocker to think this is a good idea.
 

Refer to the above quoted part in bold.  I think Chris "tingly" Mathews is off his rocker.

 

 

Quote:This is indeed a lousy deal, especially knowing that the UN/World Bank will be the ones enforcing this.  Having at least one of the most corrupt organizations in the world (The UN) handle this is bound to create all sorts of problems.   

 

People who are surprised Obama and McConnell are working on this together really don't have a clue who Mitch McConnell is.  He's nothing more than Harry Reid 2
 

People who are surprised that Obama is working on this don't really have a clue who Obama is either.  Or Bill Ayers.  Or Cass Sunstein.  Or John Holdren  Or George Soros....  the list goes on.  These people all have something in common.



There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

#15

Quote:That tells me all I need to know.

 

 

 

Refer to the above quoted part in bold.  I think Chris "tingly" Mathews is off his rocker.

 

 

 

People who are surprised that Obama is working on this don't really have a clue who Obama is either.  Or Bill Ayers.  Or Cass Sunstein.  Or John Holdren  Or George Soros....  the list goes on.  These people all have something in common.
 

This is true for most, but it's the people who support Obama despite knowing who the people behind the myth are who are more of a worry.  They understand what's happening, and they support it.

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=59]
Reply

#16

Quote:That tells me all I need to know.

 

 

 

Refer to the above quoted part in bold.  I think Chris "tingly" Mathews is off his rocker.

 

 

 

People who are surprised that Obama is working on this don't really have a clue who Obama is either.  Or Bill Ayers.  Or Cass Sunstein.  Or John Holdren  Or George Soros....  the list goes on.  These people all have something in common.
Or the Koch's or the Corporations or the congressman pushing for this.... It's pretty sad really. 

Reply

#17

Quote:Or the Koch's or the Corporations or the congressman pushing for this.... It's pretty sad really. 
Funny how the Koch brothers are always the counter argument against the likes of George Soros.  After that it's "corporations" rather than naming certain people or positions.  Also, the congressman pushing for this happens to lean left.  Hmm... ponder that for a bit.



There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

Quote:Funny how the Koch brothers are always the counter argument against the likes of George Soros.  After that it's "corporations" rather than naming certain people or positions.  Also, the congressman pushing for this happens to lean left.  Hmm... ponder that for a bit.


Boudreau has a serious Koch addiction.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

#19

Quote:Funny how the Koch brothers are always the counter argument against the likes of George Soros. After that it's "corporations" rather than naming certain people or positions. Also, the congressman pushing for this happens to lean left. Hmm... ponder that for a bit.


Just as Soros is the counter to the Koch brother. Seems fair to me


When did McConnell start leaning left? I didn't put party into it at all. All I did was add to what you said because I agreed. Why defensive to corrupt right wingers involved?
Reply

#20

Quote:Boudreau has a serious Koch addiction.
You wish Wink
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!