Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Badlands National Park stands up to Trump administration by tweeting facts

#1

http://www.theverge.com/2017/1/24/143771...ate-change

 

As the Trump administration races to silence scientists in government, some federal employees are mounting small but visible resistance efforts. The Twitter account for Badlands National Park posted a stream of climate facts today, seemingly in protest of the Trump administration’s gag order on the Environmental Protection Agency. But the tweets later disappeared after gaining traction online.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

Resistance is futile
Reply

#3

Yeah that was a dumb move by Trump that I think will get overturned quickly, or simply not enforced. 

Reply

#4

It wouldn't have hurt if they added a bit more context too, though. Like that with carbon dioxide at 280 PPM, and falling, we were scary close to the shutdown of photosynthesis (occurring at right around 200 PPM) which would have been catastrophic in the other direction. Or that for the vast majority of the earth's existence carbon dioxide has been in the thousands of PPM without turning into Venus. 

 

Fear mongering isn't the answer either. 

Reply

#5

Quote:It wouldn't have hurt if they added a bit more context too, though. Like that with carbon dioxide at 280 PPM, and falling, we were scary close to the shutdown of photosynthesis (occurring at right around 200 PPM) which would have been catastrophic in the other direction. Or that for the vast majority of the earth's existence carbon dioxide has been in the thousands of PPM without turning into Venus. 

 

Fear mongering isn't the answer either. 
 

[Image: figure-25-01-04ab.%402x.jpeg]

 

Terrestrial plants didn't begin inhabiting the Earth until about 500 million years ago during the Ordovician period. The concentration of atmospheric CO2 during that period was 2240 ppmv. These were extremely simple plants with little vascularity. They slowly evolved over time and didn't reach the type of biodiversity we see today until CO2 levels dropped significantly beginning in the Carboniferous period around 290 million YA (this period saw the first ferns and eventually ancient conifers) (http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/carbonifero...blife.html). Flowering plants (angiosperms)...those ones we need for our food did not appear until 100 million years ago (https://www.boundless.com/biology/textbo...620-11841/). The levels of CO2 during this period (Cretaceous) was around 340 ppmv....which is a little lower than where it is today. 

 

We didn't turn to Venus primarily because we are further away from the Sun and stayed just cool enough to keep our oceans. About 2 billion years ago Venus likely had oceans but they boiled away. 

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

Quote:[Image: figure-25-01-04ab.%402x.jpeg]

 

We didn't turn to Venus primarily because we are further away from the Sun and stayed just cool enough to keep our oceans. About 2 billion years ago Venus likely had oceans but they boiled away. 
 

And also because the atmospheric pressure on Venus is 50x that on Earth. The temperature in Venus' atmosphere at the same pressure as Earth is about the same as it is here.





                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply

#7

They removed the tweets and blamed it on a former employee with social media access. They really showed Trump.


Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!