Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Should the Jaguars start tanking?

#1

The season is all but over and we are currently tied with Oakland as the only 2 teams without any wins. Should we begin positioning for the best possible draft slotting?



*Disclaimer*

I, for one, don't believe in tanking but there are some on here who do. If you do believe in tanking at this point just make sure your aren't also criticizing the team after every loss. Don't be THAT guy.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

Do we really have to try? [Image: confused0024.r191677.gif] 

 


Reply

#3

Quote:Do we really have to try? [Image: confused0024.r191677.gif] 

 
 

No

Reply

#4
(This post was last modified: 10-14-2014, 12:19 PM by David4499.)

Go ahead.

[Image: giphy.gif]


I ain't no monkey... I'm an ape. Banana
Reply

#5

We don't even need to try. 

 

Just have Bradley keep coaching as he is. They'll lose. 

 

 

Laughing Laughing 

 

 

 

To answer the question. No. The Jags have their QB now. 


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

If they tank they'll be 0-16 instead of 1-15, in that situtation I doubt Bradley is still with the team. 


Reply

#7

Quote:The season is all but over and we are currently tied with Oakland as the only 2 teams without any wins. Should we begin positioning for the best possible draft slotting?



*Disclaimer*

I, for one, don't believe in tanking but there are some on here who do. If you do believe in tanking at this point just make sure your aren't also criticizing the team after every loss. Don't be THAT guy.
Never. Never go into the tank. If they ever do, that's when I'll stop watching.
I'm condescending. That means I talk down to you. 
Check out the Jag's Forum Alternative: Duval Football Fans.
Reply

#8

Good teams tank, bad teams lose all on their own.. 


[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply

#9

Good Lord here we go again.

 

Sorry, id rather break an 0-6 record.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

Tank for what? We've got a QB already, we need to establish a competitive, winning culture
Reply

#11
(This post was last modified: 10-14-2014, 12:33 PM by Jagwired.)

Quote:We don't even need to try. 

 

Just have Bradley keep coaching as he is. They'll lose. 

 

 

Laughing Laughing

 

 

 

To answer the question. No. The Jags have their QB now. 
Tanking is for losers no matter the position of need. No to tanking.

 

 

 

I find the fact  hilarious that Bradley is so in your head that you cannot and will not be able to leave him out of threads that discussion of him is not the topic. It will provide great humor for us until the eventual ban for derailing.


Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 
Reply

#12

With there being possibly as many as 4 early first round QBs this year (Mariota, Winston, Hundley, Petty) the potential for trading down for a windfall of picks certainly exists. So I understand both sides of the argument. Is 2 or 3 wins worth more than future early draft picks?
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
Reply

#13

IMO,  trying to build a winning culture should take precedent over the benefits of what a higher draft pick could provide the Jaguars.  Losing is a cycle that's difficult to break.   For a team to make a major jump forward,   experiencing winning goes along way in making this a reality.



Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

Quote:With there being possibly as many as 4 early first round QBs this year (Mariota, Winston, Hundley, Petty) the potential for trading down for a windfall of picks certainly exists. So I understand both sides of the argument. Is 2 or 3 wins worth more than future early draft picks?
 

The Jags will likely get one of the top 2 selections. 

 

I agree with your assertion, except that I don't see Hundley or Petty being all that much of a trade chip. They aren't that good. 

 

The Jags will have to be selecting with either Mariota or Winston on the clock to be able to net a decent return of draft choices. 

Reply

#15

No.  You only 'tank' when you lack talent all around, and can't get any.  This team has talent now.  I'll be highly disappointed if we win less than 3 games this year.  


I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply

#16

Quote:The season is all but over and we are currently tied with Oakland as the only 2 teams without any wins. Should we begin positioning for the best possible draft slotting?



*Disclaimer*

I, for one, don't believe in tanking but there are some on here who do. If you do believe in tanking at this point just make sure your aren't also criticizing the team after every loss. Don't be THAT guy.
You mean that isnt what the team was doing already?  Dang then the team just blows then huh?

sarcastic remarks...

Reply

#17

Quote:Go ahead.

[Image: giphy.gif]
How is garbage beautiful again?  Oh wait I get how that relates to what we watch on Sunday...

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

Quote:No.  You only 'tank' when you lack talent all around, and can't get any.  This team has talent now.  I'll be highly disappointed if we win less than 3 games this year.  
 

Less than 3???

 

Theres no acceptable reason that they shouldn't be at LEAST 4-12 (same as last years mark). 

 

Anything less than that and you should be highly disappointed. 

Reply

#19

Quote:The Jags will likely get one of the top 2 selections.


I agree with your assertion, except that I don't see Hundley or Petty being all that much of a trade chip. They aren't that good.


The Jags will have to be selecting with either Mariota or Winston on the clock to be able to net a decent return of draft choices.


Well TBH, that may very well work in the Jags favor. Lack of available potential franchise QBs should by definition drive up the cost of the 2 deemed worthy. But being in position to demand a trade remains key.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
Reply

#20

Stop with these threads.  It's time to win.  We have our QB, who do we tank for?  An O-line?  Get real. 


[Image: 160572067683e562faff2fbedb33413b.gif]
Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!