Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Gerhart in I formation

#1

Liked the formation, seemed productive when Gerhart was not hit in backfield and holes were there. Why did we not run it more after setting up 2nd and short?


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2
(This post was last modified: 09-28-2014, 09:51 PM by CSO14.)

Slowby is garbage. He had to beg for that TD. He has a Mike alstott frame, and cant move a pile or gain 1 freaking yard without falling down.


Give me some DRob.
[Image: 160572067683e562faff2fbedb33413b.gif]
Reply

#3

The less we see of Gerhart the better. 


[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

#4

Why don't they just make Denard the starter?


Reply

#5

What to never say as a Jaguars fan...  

 

"Why did we not run it more?"


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

Quote:Liked the formation, seemed productive when Gerhart was not hit in backfield and holes were there. Why did we not run it more after setting up 2nd and short?
 

What holes?

Reply

#7

Quote:What to never say as a Jaguars fan...  

 

"Why did we not run it more?"
 

I think we will after Pasztor gets back.

Reply

#8

Quote:What holes?
 

Watch the game - again. You did record it, didn't you?

Reply

#9

Quote:Why don't they just make Denard the starter?
 

Because stats don't lie and unfortunately Gerhart had a better game than Denard..

 

[Image: 20j4u3o.png]



[Image: ezgif-5-b2a80726c8.gif]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

Quote:Because stats don't lie and unfortunately Gerhart had a better game than Denard..

 

[Image: 20j4u3o.png]
What's unfortunate about it. The coaches had an offense they had in mind and tried to make Gerhart do things he wasn't designed for. He's most certainly a bruiser type back and we saw some good run out of them. We got 85 yards out of the group.

Reply

#11

5 weeks ago we were all so excited about our coaching staff, the defense, and Toby Gerhart. Now.....

 

Funny though how nearly everyone in the NFL thought Gerhart was a steal and going to have a breakout year. 


Reply

#12

Quote:Because stats don't lie and unfortunately Gerhart had a better game than Denard..

 

[Image: 20j4u3o.png]
 

Not if you consider fumbling and a failed 4th down conversion. Not to mention his TD set up by Denard.

Reply

#13

Quote:What's unfortunate about it. The coaches had an offense they had in mind and tried to make Gerhart do things he wasn't designed for. He's most certainly a bruiser type back and we saw some good run out of them. We got 85 yards out of the group.
 

fa·ce·tious

<div style="font-size:large;">fəˈsēSHəs/

<div><i>adjective</i>
 
<ol class="">[*]

<div style="margin-left:20px;">
<div style=";">
<div>treating serious issues with deliberately inappropriate humor; flippant.
</div>
</div>
</div>

</ol></div>
</div>


[Image: ezgif-5-b2a80726c8.gif]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

Quote:Because stats don't lie and unfortunately Gerhart had a better game than Denard..

[Image: 20j4u3o.png]
by that picture id put blake as the rb
Reply

#15

Quote:by that picture id put blake as the rb
 

Sad but true..



[Image: ezgif-5-b2a80726c8.gif]
Reply

#16
(This post was last modified: 09-28-2014, 11:53 PM by tealfootball.)

Though the O-line is terrible, it's pretty sad that Bortles has nearly as many rushing yards as Gerhart in half the attempts.  RB has to be addressed at some point even though it's not of the highest priority.


Reply

#17

Quote:Because stats don't lie and unfortunately Gerhart had a better game than Denard..

 

[Image: 20j4u3o.png]
 

Stats lie all the time and Gerhart did not have a better game. Did you ever see Denard fumble or fail to convert a fourth down?

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

Quote:Though the O-line is terrible, it's pretty sad that Bortles has nearly as many rushing yards as Gerhart in half the attempts.  RB has to be addressed at some point even though it's not of the highest priority.
 

Priority is defense I would imagine.. The offense should be able to muster up points with BB.. Defense is an armpit..



[Image: ezgif-5-b2a80726c8.gif]
Reply

#19

Quote:Stats lie all the time and Gerhart did not have a better game. Did you ever see Denard fumble or fail to convert a fourth down?
 

Not during this game, didn't get the chance to.. 



[Image: ezgif-5-b2a80726c8.gif]
Reply

#20

Bortles in 1.5 games is averaging 27.5 yards per game (This is counting two quarters as a full game)


Gerhart is averaging 28 yards per game

Robinson is averaging 16.5 yards per game


Pretty sad when our QB almost has a better ypg rushing average than our RB's.  Especially when it's not a QB that's known for running all the time.


I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!