Considering our depth on the O-line, Caldwell still cut Bradfield and I think it was because he wanted to send notice. You repeatedly play like crap, You aren't going to be here long. 

 

While Im usually not a fan of statement cuts, I think this one was warranted. Fans needed to see drastic change and the team needs a small healthy dose of fear for their jobs.

---

I too feel that Caldwell and Bradley is messaging the team...


Play to our Standards or you won't play for our team. Enough Said...


Get It, Got It, Good...


NH3...

---

"AZANE"

I couldn't believe they kept him after last season...

---

"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."
;
Charles Schultz
;
 
;
"The harder I work, the luckier I get."
;
T-Shirt at District Wrestling Meet.

Considering our depth on the O-line, Caldwell still cut Bradfield and I think it was because he wanted to send notice. You repeatedly play like crap, You aren't going to be here long. 

 

While Im usually not a fan of statement cuts, I think this one was warranted. Fans needed to see drastic change and the team needs a small healthy dose of fear for their jobs.

 

Apparently that wasn't the case.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Considering our depth on the O-line, Caldwell still cut Bradfield and I think it was because he wanted to send notice. You repeatedly play like crap, You aren't going to be here long. 

 

While Im usually not a fan of statement cuts, I think this one was warranted. Fans needed to see drastic change and the team needs a small healthy dose of fear for their jobs.

 

Cameron Bradfield was not cut "to make a statement." He was not playing well and if you don't play well, you get cut. Simple as that. But it probably did send a statement to the other linemen.

---

I couldn't believe they kept him after last season...

 

Remember last season he had to play on the left side.

---

He was not playing well and if you don't play well, you get cut.

That sounds like a pretty strong statement right there.

---

Cameron Bradfield was not cut "to make a statement." He was not playing well and if you don't play well, you get cut. Simple as that. But it probably did send a statement to the other linemen.

 

True, it was not an obvious statement.  But the consequence of cutting a player that is playing poorly sends a non-verbal message to the team.  

 

However, I'm with you, it's not like it's a statement that ALL players are not aware of.  Every player knows that if you play poorly and cannot hack it, you'll get cut.  

---

Who's next? A QB with a prior year QBR of 76.5 and a current one of 81.8? Not sure what signal is being sent, other than we want a top 3 draft pick - again.

---

I thought it was a good move.  Probably him and Henne accounted for 80% of the sacks last week.

---

Best part is if, *knock on wood* something happens to Luke, then we'll have three rookies playing in our offensive line!!! More reason not to play Bortles!!! Everyone rejoice!!!

---

Cameron Bradfield was not cut "to make a statement." He was not playing well and if you don't play well, you get cut. Simple as that. But it probably did send a statement to the other linemen.

So you had a discussion with Caldwell and he said it wasn't a statement? Good to know.

---

<a target="_blank" href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v107/chuckd132132/p1_manning_all_200.jpg" target="_blank">VIEW IMAGE</a>

Let's just hope they don't follow through and cut everyone who is performing badly...we wouldn't have much of a team.

---

One of these years.............